Relationships Between Information Technology and Other Investments: A Contingent Interaction Model

References

• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu L (2012) Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. 58(5):913–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Research note—Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 6(1):3–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj S, Bharadwaj A, Bendoly E (2007) The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Black JA, Boal KB (1994) Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):131–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics. 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois III LJ (1985) Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Acad. Management J. 28(3):548–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer A (2010) The Making of the Classical Theory of Economic Growth (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2012) Complementarity in organizations. In: Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.Google Scholar
• Chari MD, Devaraj S, David P (2008) Research note: The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Management Sci. 54(1):224–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management 23(3):70–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciccone SJ, Rocco TA (2005) The tech industry or regulated industry: Which one has the true glamour stocks? J. Financial Service Professionals 59(5):64–74.Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (1975) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S (1999) Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Sci. 18(4):547–568.Link, Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA (2008) IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quart. Executive 7(3):139–150.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Malhotra A, Park Y, Pavlou PA (2010) Research commentary—seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):835–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2001) Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? J. Financial Econom. 60(1):3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2002) Econometric Analysis. (Prentice Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Wu D, Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):71–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho J, Tian F, Wu A, Xu SX (2017) Seeking value through deviation? Economic impacts of IT overinvestment and underinvestment. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):850–862.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeffers PI, Muhanna WA, Nault BR (2008) Information technology and process performance: An empirical investigation of the interaction between IT and non‐IT resources. Decision Sci. 39(4):703–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Hanssens DM (2010) The direct and indirect effects of advertising spending on firm value. J. Marketing 74(1):20–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Devaraj S, Ow TT (2012) Does information technology investment influence a firm’s market value? A case of non-publicly traded healthcare firms. MIS Quart. 36(4):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Miranda SM, Kim Y (2004) IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):110–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee TY, Bradlow ET (2011) Automated marketing research using online customer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 48(5):881–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 30(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Atuahene-Gima K (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1123–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L, Srinivasan R, Kim M (2007) Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm. J. Marketing 71(1):35–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1987) The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management J. 8(1):55–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 40(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J, Tafti A (2017) Information technology, revenues, and profits: Exploring the role of foreign and domestic operations. Informat. Systems Res. 28(2):430–444.Link, Google Scholar
• Mizik N, Jacobson R (2003) Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. J. Marketing 67(1):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Wade MR (2010) The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. 34(1):163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X (2013) Research commentary-Information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):1–14.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Lertwongsatien C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(4):237–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins J, Wiersema MF (1995) A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 16(4):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 71(1):135–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Chan YE (2001) Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Inform. Systems Res. 12(1):11–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, King WR (1995) An empirical taxonomy of the decision-making processes concerning strategic applications of information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 11(4):177–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S, Havakhor T, Steelman Z (2019) How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Lilien GL, Sridhar S (2011) Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? J. Marketing 75(3):49–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman ZR, Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S (2019) Performance consequences of information technology investments: Implications of emphasizing new or current information technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):204–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Stoel M, Muhanna W (2009) IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability Type. Inform. Management 46(3):181–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quart. 35(2):463–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J (1967) Organizations in Action. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Vitale MR, Ives B, Beath CM (1986) Linking information technology and corporate strategy: An organizational view. Maggi L, Zmud R, Wetherbe J, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, San Diego, CA, 265–276.Google Scholar
• Von Eije H, Megginson WL (2008) Dividends and share repurchases in the European Union. J. Financial Econom. 89(2):347–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade M, Hulland J (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1):107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang N, Liang H, Zhong W, Xue Y, Xiao J (2012) Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study of the business value of information technology. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):325–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Gu B (2011) Environmental uncertainty and IT infrastructure governance: A curvilinear relationship. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):389–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios. MIS Quart. 36(2):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar