Knowledge Transfers in Alliances: Exploring the Facilitating Role of Information Technology

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand B, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariño A, de la Torre J (1998) Learning from failure: Toward an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organ. Sci. 9(3):306–325.Link, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5):1019–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell GG, Zaheer A (2007) Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organ. Sci. 18(6):955–972.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SC, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj S, Bharadwaj A, Bendoly E (2007) The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2002) R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1169–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C (2004) The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management 34(3):311–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L, Ravichandran T, Andrevski G (2010) Information technology, network structure, and competitive action. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):543–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Reddi SP, Row MC (1993) The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The ‘move to the middle’ hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):9–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied Multiple Regression (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. (Technology, Organizations, and Innovation). Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Michael SC, Min CK (1998) Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. 9(3):219–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Kale P, Singh H (2001) How to make strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 42(4):37–43.Google Scholar
• Easterby‐Smith M, Lyles MA, Tsang EW (2008) Inter‐organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. J. Management Stud. 45(4):677–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (1987) Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office Tech. People 3(2):83–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Pont C, Nohria N (2002) Local vs. global mimetism: The dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 23(4):307–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. 80(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 20(5):397–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management J. 14(5):371–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Tratjenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hamel G (1991) Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 12:83–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R & D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heart T, Gefen D, Maoz H, Pliskin N (2011) From IT assets to perceived economic value: Absorptive capacities play a role. Presentation, IFIP 8.2 OASIS Workshop, December 4, Shanghai.Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad. Management J. 48(2):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G, Mellewigt T (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC (1998) Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Acad. Management Executive 12(4):69–80.Google Scholar
• Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Vaidyanath D (2002) Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. J. Management 28(3):413–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Tratjenberg M (2002) Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Nti KO (1998) Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model. Organ. Sci. 9(3):356–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3):285–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard‐Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):418–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyles MA, Salk JE (1996) Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 27(5):877–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM 30(6):484–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ (2004) Firms’ technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 25(11):1097–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I, Mein Goh J (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17:77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mroz TA (1987) The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica 55:765–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthusamy SK, White MA (2005) Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organ. Stud. 26(3):415–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J, Wada T (2009) Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Management Sci. 55(4):635–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Sampson RC (2004) The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):723–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Toward a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy 13(6):343–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J, Shaver JM (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 26(2):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1967) The Tacit Dimension (Anchor, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: Exploring the role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Xue L, Barney JB (2013) Impact of information technology capital on firm scope and performance: The role of asset characteristics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1125–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2006) Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 21(4):429–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Hartono E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. 27(1):125–129.Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter Special Issue):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Krishnan MS (2007) The effect of IT investment on mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. banking industry: Integration costs and operational efficiency. Proc. 12th Annual INFORMS Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. (Information Systems Society, Seattle).Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology–enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2006) Capturing the real value of innovation tools. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(2):24–32.Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2008) Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management J. 29(3):251–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Cengage Learning, Issaquah, WA).Google Scholar
• Yu L, Ravichandran T (2015) Alliance experience, IT enabled knowledge integration and ex ante value gains Organ. Sci. 26(2):511–530.Google Scholar
• Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar