Balancing Openness and Prioritization in a Two-Tier Internet

References

• Bourreau M, Kourandi F, Valletti T (2015) Net neutrality with competing internet platforms. J. Indust. Econom. 63(1):30–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brock WA, Evans DS (1985) The economics of regulatory tiering. RAND J. Econom. 16(2):398–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Guo H (2010) The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):1–27Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Kim BC (2010) Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):446–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon DS, Kim BC (2015) Net neutrality, business models, and internet interconnection. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 7(3):104–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon DS, Kim BC (2018) Net neutrality, network capacity, and innovation at the edges. J. Indust. Econom. 66(1):172–204.Google Scholar
• D’Annunzio A, Russo A (2015) Net neutrality and internet fragmentation: The role of online advertising. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43(2015):30–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson A (2015) Examining the welfare implications of net neutrality with outside implications. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Dierker E (1991) The optimality of Boiteux-Ramsey pricing. Econometrica 59(1):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy-Deno FT (2003) Business demand for broadband access capacity. J. Regulatory Econom. 24(3):359–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EC (2013) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent, and amending Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1211/2009 and (EU) No. 531/2012. Accessed January 3, 2017, http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2013/EN/1-2013-627-EN-F1-1.Pdf.Google Scholar
• EC (2015) Roaming charges and open internet: Questions and answers, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-5275_en.htm.Google Scholar
• Economides N, Hermalin BE (2012) The economics of network neutrality. RAND J. Econom. 43(4):602–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Tag J (2012) Network neutrality on the internet: A two-sided market analysis. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(2012):91–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2010) Report and order FCC 10-201, FCCR 17905, December 23, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2014) Notice of proposed rulemaking FCC 14-61, May 15, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2015) Report and order on remand, declaratory ruling, and order FCC 15-24, March 12.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2018) Declaratory ruling, report and order report and order, and order FCC 17-166, January 4.Google Scholar
• Galperin H, Ruzzier CA (2013) Price elasticitiy of demand for broadband: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Telecomm. Policy 37(2013):429–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Peitz M, Valletti T (2016) Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(2):127–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S (2012) Net neutrality, broadband market coverage, and innovation at the edge. Decision Sci. 43(1):141–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Bandyopadhyay S, Cheng HK, Yang Y (2010) Net neutrality and vertical integration of content and broadband services. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):243–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Stahl DO, Whinston AB (1997) A stochastic equilibrium model of internet pricing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 21(4–5):697–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Jukic B, Stahl DO, Whinston AB (2000) Extracting consumers’ private information for implementing incentive-compatible internet traffic pricing. J. MIS 17(1):9–29.Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Jukic B, Stahl DO, Whinston AB (2011) An analysis of incentives for network infrastructure investment under different pricing strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):215–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Katz ML (2007) The economics of product-line restrictions with an application to the network neutrality debate. Inform. Econom. Policy 19(2):215–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kourandi F, Krämer J, Valletti T (2015) Net neutrality, exclusivity contracts, and internet fragmentation. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):320–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraemer J, Wiewiorra L (2012) Network neutrality and congestion sensitive content providers: Implications for content variety, broadband investment, and regulation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1303–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Levi MD, Nault BR (2004) Converting technology to mitigate environmental damage. Management Sci. 50(8):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• MacKie-Mason J, Varian H (1995) Pricing the internet. Kahin B, Keller J, eds. Public Access to the Internet (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nault BR (1996) Equivalence of taxes and subsidies in the control of production externalities. Management Sci. 71(3):307–320.Link, Google Scholar
• Njoroge P, Ozdaglar A, Stier-Moses NE, Weintraub GY (2013) Investment in two-sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Rev. Network Econom. 12(4):355–402.Google Scholar
• Peitz M, Schuett F (2016) Net neutrality and inflation of traffic. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 46(2016):16–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picot A, Krcmar H (2011) Interview with Marvin Ammori and christof Weinhardt on “Network neutrality and the future of telecommunication?” Business Inform. Systems Engrg. 53(5):327–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed B (2013) Netflix and YouTube are the Internet?s bandwidth consumption kings. BGR (November 11), http://bgr.com/2013/11/11/netflix-youtube-bandwidth-consumption/.Google Scholar
• Reggiani C, Valletti T (2016) Net neutrality and innovation at the core and at the edge. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 45(2016):16–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegal J (2014) Was Verizon lying to us about Netflix congestion issues? BGR (July 18), http://bgr.com/2014/07/18/verizon-netflix-congestion-issues/.Google Scholar
• Singham R, Ohanian A (2014) Net neutrality, monopoly and the death of the democratic internet. ThoughtWorks (May 14), https://www.thoughtworks.com/de/insights/blog/net-neutrality-monopoly-and-death-democratic-internet.Google Scholar
• United States Court of Appeals (2014) On petition for review and notice of appeal of an order of the federal communications commission. No. 11-1355, January 14, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• United States Court of Appeals (2016) United States Telecom Association, et al., petitioners versus Federal Communications Commission and United States of America respondents; Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance, et al., intervenors. No. 15-1063, June 14, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Verizon & Google (2010) Verizon-Google legislative framework proposal. Accessed December 2, 2016, http://www.google.com/googleblogs/pdfs/verizon_google_legislative_framework_proposal_081010.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wijeratne Y (2016) The seven companies that really own the internet. Accessed February 17, 2017, http://icaruswept.com/2016/06/28/who-owns-the-internet/.Google Scholar
• Wyatt E (2014) F.C.C., in a shift, backs fast lanes for web traffic. New York Times (April 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html.Google Scholar