Does Superposition Influence the Success of FLOSS Projects? An Examination of Open-Source Software Development by Organizations and Individuals

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0829

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borges H, Tulio Valente M (2018) What’s in a GitHub Star? Understanding starring practices in a social coding platform. J. Systems Software 146:112–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capra E, Francalanci C, Merlo F, Rossi-lamastra C (2011) Firms’ involvement in open source projects: A trade-off between software structural quality and popularity. J. Systems Software 84:144–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carte TA, Russel CJ (2003) In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. 27(3):479–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua CEH, Adrian YKY (2010) Artifacts, actors, and interactions in the cross- project coordination practices of open-source communities. J. Assoc. Information Systems 11(12):838–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colazo JA, Fang Y, Neufeld D (2005) Development success in open source software projects: Exploring the impact of copylefted licenses. Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 929–936.Google Scholar
  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19(1):15–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coverity Inc. (2013) Coverity Scan 2013 open source report. Accessed January 4, 2017, http://softwareintegrity.coverity.com/rs/coverity/images/2013-Coverity-Scan-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Crowston K, Howison J, Annabi H (2006) Information systems success in free and open source software development: Theory and measures. Software Process Improv. Pract. 11(2):123–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K, Scozzi B (2004) Coordination practices within FLOSS development teams: The bug fixing process. Proc. 1st Internat. Workshop Comput. Supported Activity Coordination, CSAC 2004, Porto, Portugal, 21–30.Google Scholar
  • Crowston K, Wei K, Howison J, Wiggins A (2012) Free/Libre open-source software development. ACM Comput. Survey 44(2):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K, Wei K, Li Q (2005) Coordination of free/libre and open source software development. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 181–193.Google Scholar
  • Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delone WH, Mclean ER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Res. 3(1):60–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Engeström Y (2007) From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. Hughes J, Jewson N, Unwin L, eds. Communities of Practice—Critical Perspectives (Routledge, London), 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Gandal N (2004) The determinants of output per contributor in open source projects: An empirical examination. CEPR Discussion Papers 4329, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Gandal N (2011) Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: The “social network” of open-source projects. RAND J. Econom. 42(1):70–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fitzgerald B (2006) The transformation of open source software. MIS Quart. 30(3):587–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GitHub (2017a) About stars. Retrieved January 1, 2017, https://help.github.com/articles/about-stars.Google Scholar
  • GitHub (2017b) Glossary—Commit. Retrieved January 1, 2017, https://help.github.com/articles/github-glossary/#commit.Google Scholar
  • Google (2014) Table details: 2014. Retrieved January 1, 2017, https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/githubarchive:year.2014?pli=1&tab=details.Google Scholar
  • Gousios G, Pinzger M, Van Deursen A (2014) An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (ACM, New York), 345–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberger DB, Strasser S (1986) Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 11(1):164–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal R, Lilien GL, Girish M (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grigorik I (2012) The GitHub archive. Retrieved January 1, 2017, https://www.githubarchive.org/.Google Scholar
  • Guenter H, van Emmerik IJH, Schreurs B (2014) The negative effects of delays in information exchange: Looking at workplace relationships from an affective events perspective. Human Resources Management Rev. 24(4):238–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haans JFR, Pieters C, He ZL (2015) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37:1177–1195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF, Cai L (2007) Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behav. Res. Methods 39(4):709–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S (2008) Applied Survival Analysis. Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howison J, Crowston K (2014) Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way. MIS Quart. 38(1):29–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarczyk O, Gruszka B, Jaroszewicz S, Bukowski L (2014) GitHub projects: Quality analysis of open-source software. 6th Internat. Conf. Soc. Informatics (Springer International, Cham, Switzerland), 80–94.Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Lang KR (2011) Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the nine inch nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning 44(5–6):440–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):911–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalliamvakou E, Gousios G, Singer L, Blincoe K, German DM, Damian D (2014) The promises and perils of mining GitHub. Proc. 11th Workshop Conf. Mining Software Repositories (ACM, New York), 92–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ke W, Zhang P (2010) The effects of extrinsic motivations and satisfaction in open source software development. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(12):784–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnamurthy S (2005) Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. Accessed May 1, 2019, https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1477/1392.Google Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quart. 36(2):649–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K, Wolf RG (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee SYT, Kim HW, Gupta S (2009) Measuring open source software success. Internat. J. Management Sci. 37:426–438.Google Scholar
  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2003) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 72(1):109–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindberg A (2015) The Origin, Evolution, and Variation of Routine Structures in Open Source Software Development: Three Mixed Computational-Qualitative Studies (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland).Google Scholar
  • Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2016) Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):751–772.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. 26(1):87–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michlmayr M, Fitzgerald B (2012) Time-based release management in free and open source (FOSS) projects. Internat. J. Open Source Software Processes 4(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Microsoft News Center (2018) Microsoft to acquire GitHub for $7.5 billion. Retrieved August 1, 2018, https://news.microsoft.com/2018/06/04/microsoft-to-acquire-github-for-7-5-billion.Google Scholar
  • Midha V, Palvia P (2012) Factors affecting the success of open source software. J. Systems Software 85(4):895–905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb J (2002) Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology 11(3):309–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neath K (2010) Introducing organizations. Retrieved August 1, 2018, https://blog.github.com/2010-06-29-introducing-organizations.Google Scholar
  • O’Mahony S (2005) Nonprofit foundations and their role in community-firm software collaboration. Fitzgerald B, Feller J, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 393–413.Google Scholar
  • Pearce J (2014) 9.9 Million lines of code and still moving fast—Facebook Open Source in 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2017, https://code.facebook.com/posts/292625127566143/9-9-million-lines-of-code-and-still-moving-fast-facebook-open-source-in-2014.Google Scholar
  • Phillips PCB, Park JY (1988) On the formulation of Wald tests of nonlinear restrictions. Econometrica 56(5):1065–1083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao CR (1972) Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Raymond E (1998) The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday 3(3).Google Scholar
  • Rebeca MD, García CE (2009) Returns from social capital in open source software networks. J. Evolutionary Econom. 19(2):277–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JA, Hann IH, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(February):68–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rynes SL, Bartunek JM, Daft RL (2001) Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Acad. Management J. 44(2):340–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaarschmidt M, Gianfranco W, Von Kortzfleisch H (2015) How do firms influence open source software communities? A framework and empirical analysis of different governance modes. Inform. Organ. 25(2):99–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selvidge PR, Chaparro BS, Bender GT (2002) The world wide wait: Effects of delays on user performance. Internat. J. Indust. Ergonomics 29(1):15–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen R, Subramaniam C, Nelson ML (2008) Determinants of the choice of Open Source Software License. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(3):207–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Setia P, Rajagopalan B, Sambamurthy V, Calantone R (2012) How peripheral developers contribute to open-source software development. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):144–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh PV, Phelps C (2013) Networks, social influence and the choice among competing innovations: Insights from open source software licenses. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):539–560.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spaeth S, von Krogh G, He F (2015) Perceived firm attributes and intrinsic motivation in sponsored open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):224–237.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart KJ, Ammeter AP, Maruping LM (2006) Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):126–144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Subramaniam C, Sen R, Nelson ML (2009) Determinants of open source software project success : A longitudinal study. Decision Support Systems 46(2):576–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R (2010) Editor ’s comments : Construct clarity in theories. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):346–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teigland R, Di Gangi PM, Flåten BT, Giovacchini E, Pastorino N (2014) Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity. Inform. Organ. 24(1):25–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay J, Dabbish L, Herbsleb J (2014) Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. 36th Internet. Conf. Software Engrg. (ACM, New York), 356–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagstrom PA (2009) Vertical Interaction in Open Software Engineering Communities (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
  • Weiss HM, Cropanzo R (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:1–74.Google Scholar
  • Zhang P (2013) The affective response model: A theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Quart. 37(1):247–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.