The Adaptive Roles of Positive and Negative Emotions in Organizational Insiders’ Security-Based Precaution Taking

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0860

References

  • Abraham C, Boudreau MC, Junglas I, Watson R (2013) Enriching our theoretical repertoire: The role of evolutionary psychology in technology acceptance. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):56–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abramson LY, Seligman ME, Teasdale JD (1978) Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. J. Abnormal Psych. 87(1):49–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albrechtsen E, Hovden J (2009) The information security digital divide between information security managers and users. Comput. Security 28(6):476–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avey JB, Luthans F, Jensen SM (2009) Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management 48(5):677–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avey JB, Patera JL, West BJ (2006) The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 13(2):42–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avey JB, Reichard RJ, Luthans F, Mhatre KH (2011) Meta analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Dev. Quart. 22(2):127–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi RP, Gopinath M, Nyer PU (1999) The role of emotions in marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 27(2):184–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baskerville R, Spagnoletti P, Kim J (2014) Incident-centered information security: Managing a strategic balance between prevention and response. Inform. Management 51(1):138–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bassellier G, Benbasat I, Reich BH (2003) The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT. Inform. Systems Res. 14(4):317–336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bateman TS, Organ DW (1983) Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.” Acad. Management J. 26(4):587–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quart. 34(4):689–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett RJ, Robinson SL (2000) Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3):349–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett RJ, Robinson SL (2003) The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. Greenberg J, ed. Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 247–281.Google Scholar
  • Boss SR, Galletta DF, Lowry PB, Moody GD, Polak P (2015) What do users have to fear? Using fear appeals to engender threats and fear that motivate protective behaviors in users. MIS Quart. 39(4):837–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boss SR, Kirsch LJ, Angermeier I, Shingler RA, Boss RW (2009) If someone is watching, I’ll do what I’m asked: Mandatoriness, control, and information security. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):151–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns AJ, Posey C, Roberts TL, Benjamin Lowry P (2017) Examining the relationship of organizational insiders’ psychological capital with information security threat and coping appraisals. Comput. Human Behav. 68(March):190–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG (1999) The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(5):839–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cambridge Dictionary (n.d.) Precaution. Accessed May 17, 2018, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/precaution.Google Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (1982) Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psych. Bull. 92(1):111–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver CS, Scheier MF (1990) Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psych. Rev. 97(1):19–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cenfetelli RT (2004) Getting in touch with our feelings toward technology. Acad. Management Proc. 2004(1):F1–F6.Google Scholar
  • Chen G, Gully SM, Whiteman J-A, Kilcullen RN (2000) Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):835–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Ramamurthy K, Wen K-W (2012) Organizations’ information security policy compliance: Stick or carrot approach? J. Management Inform. Systems 29(3):157–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (2000) Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, eds. Handbook of Emotions, 2nd ed. (Guilford, New York), 91–115.Google Scholar
  • Crossler RE, Johnston AC, Lowry PB, Hu Q, Warkentin M, Baskerville R (2013) Future directions for behavioral information security research. Comput. Security 32:90–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culbertson SS, Fullagar CJ, Mills MJ (2010) Feeling good and doing great: The relationship between psychological capital and well-being. J. Occup. Health Psych. 15(4):421–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Arcy J, Herath T (2011) A review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: Making sense of the disparate findings. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 20(6):643–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Arcy J, Herath T, Shoss M (2014) Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):285–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dell (2017) Dell end-user security survey. Accessed February 9, 2018, https://datasecurity.dell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Dell-End-User-Security-Survey-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Dlamini M, Eloff JH, Eloff MM (2009) Information security: The moving target. Comput. Security 28(3):189–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck CS (1975) The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(4):674–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Éthier J, Hadaya P, Talbot J, Cadieux J (2006) B2C website quality and emotions during online shopping episodes: An empirical study. Inform. Management 43(5):627–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(5):992–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas JP, George JM (2001) Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(1):3–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL (1998) What good are positive emotions? Rev. Gen. Psych. 2(3):300–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer. Psych. 56(3):218–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL (2004) The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 359(1449):1367–1378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL, Branigan C (2005) Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition Emotion 19(3):313–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL, Joiner T (2002) Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psych. Sci. 13(2):172–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR (2003) What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(2):365–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frijda NH (1988) The laws of emotion. Amer. Psych. 43(5):349–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fritz C, Sonnentag S, Spector PE, McInroe JA (2010) The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. J. Organ. Behav. 31(8):1137–1162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fugate M, Prussia GE, Kinicki AJ (2012) Managing employee withdrawal during organizational change: The role of threat appraisal. J. Management 38(3):890–914.Google Scholar
  • Gable SL, Haidt J (2005) What (and why) is positive psychology? Rev. Gen. Psych. 9(2):103–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Straub DW, Rigdon EE (2011) An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quart. 35(2):iii–xiv.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerbing DW, Anderson JC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. 25(2):186–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haghighat R (2007) The development of the brief social desirability scale (BSDS). Eur. J. Psych. 3(4).Google Scholar
  • Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equations Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Hamill JT, Deckro RF, Kloeber JM (2005) Evaluating information assurance strategies. Decision Support Systems 39(3):463–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han S, Lerner JS, Keltner D (2007) Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. J. Consumer Psych. 17(3):158–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hantula DA, Kock N, D’Arcy JP, DeRosa DM (2011) Media compensation theory: A Darwinian perspective on adaptation to electronic communication and collaboration. Saad G, ed. Evolutionary Psychology in the Business Sciences (Springer, Berlin), 339–363.Google Scholar
  • Harlé KM, Sanfey AG (2010) Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions. Cognition Emotion 24(8):1456–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hibbeln M, Jenkins JL, Schneider C, Valacich JS (2017) How is your user feeling? Inferring emotion through human-computer interaction devices. MIS Quart. 41(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (1989) Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Amer. Psych. 44(3):513–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (2002) Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psych. 6(4):307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu JS-C, Shih S-P, Hung YW, Lowry PB (2015) The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):282–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang Y (2005) Investigating enterprise systems adoption: Uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 14(2):150–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isen AM (1999) Positive affect. Dalgleish T, Power MJ, eds. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (John Wiley and Sons, New York), 521–539.Google Scholar
  • Izard CE (1977) Human Emotions (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 30(2):199–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2012) The negative consequences of measurement model misspecification: A response to Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas. MIS Quart. 36(1):139–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston AC, Warkentin M (2010) Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study. MIS Quart. 34(3):549–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Bradley JC, Luchman JN, Haynes D (2009) On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):162–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kays K, Gathercoal K, Buhrow W (2012) Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items? Comput. Human Behav. 28(1):251–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keaveney SM, Nelson JE (1993) Coping with organizational role stress: Intrinsic motivational orientation, perceived role benefits, and psychological withdrawal. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 21(2):113–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny DA (2018) Mediation. Accessed February 14, 2018, http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.Google Scholar
  • Kline RB (2010) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kock N (2009) Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: An interdisciplinary review and theory integration framework. MIS Quart. 33(2):395–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and Adaptation, Kindle ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lee S, Lang A (2009) Discrete emotion and motivation: Relative activation in the appetitive and aversive motivational systems as a function of anger, sadness, fear, and joy during televised information campaigns. Media Psych. 12(2):148–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, D’Arcy J, Hammer B, Moody GD (2016) “Cargo Cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including Mechanical Turk and online panels. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 25(3):232–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Moody GD (2015) Proposing the control-reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organizational information security policies. Inform. Systems J. 25(5):433–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Moody GD, Galletta DF, Vance A (2013) The drivers in the use of online whistle-blowing reporting systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):153–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Posey C, Bennett RJ, Roberts TL (2015) Leveraging fairness and reactance theories to deter reactive computer abuse following enhanced organisational information security policies: An empirical study of the influence of counterfactual reasoning and organisational trust. Inform. Systems J. 25(3):193–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F (2002) The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 23(6):695–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F, Avey JB, Avolio BJ, Norman SM, Combs GM (2006) Psychological capital development: Toward a micro‐intervention. J. Organ. Behav. 27(3):387–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F, Avey JB, Patera JL (2008a) Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 7(2):209–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ (2007b) Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge, Kindle ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luthans F, Youssef CM, Rawski SL (2011) A tale of two paradigms: The impact of psychological capital and reinforcing feedback on problem solving and innovation. J. Organ. Behav. Management 31(4):333–350.Google Scholar
  • Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Avey JB, Norman SM (2007a) Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personality Psych. 60(3):541–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F, Norman SM, Avolio BJ, Avey JB (2008b) The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—employee performance relationship. J. Organ. Behav. 29(2):219–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E (2005) The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psych. Bull. 131(6):803–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackinnon A, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Rodgers B (1999) A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality Individual Differences 27(3):405–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis (Erlbaum, New York).Google Scholar
  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(1):99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merriam-Webster (n.d.) Precaution. Accessed May 17, 2018, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/precaution.Google Scholar
  • Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2010) Mplus User's Guide, 6th ed. (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Nabi R (2002) Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Commun. Monogr. 69(3):204–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesse RM, Ellsworth PC (2009) Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders. Amer. Psych. 64(2):129–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Öhman A, Mineka S (2001) Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psych. Rev. 108(3):483–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SK (1998) Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):835–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posey C, Roberts TL, Lowry PB, Bennett RJ, Courtney JF (2013) Insiders’ protection of organizational information assets: Development of a systematics-based taxonomy and theory of diversity for protection-motivated behaviors. MIS Quart. 37(4):1189–1210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandin P (2004) The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution. Environ. Values 13(4):461–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sansone C, Thoman DB (2005) Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. Eur. Psych. 10(3):175–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sansone C, Thoman DB, Smith JL (2010) Interest and self-regulation. Hoyle RH, ed. Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK), 192–217.Google Scholar
  • Scheier MF, Carver CS (1985) Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psych. 4(3):219–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seligman M, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. Amer. Psych. 55(1):5–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheldon KM, King L (2001) Why positive psychology is necessary. Amer. Psych. 56(3):216–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silvia PJ (2008) Interest—The curious emotion. Curr. Directions Psych. Sci. 17(1):57–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siponen M, Vance A (2010) Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quart. 34(3):487–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith CA, Ellsworth PC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(4):813–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith CA, Lazarus RS (1990) Emotion and adaptation. Pervin LA, ed. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (Guilford, New York), 609–637.Google Scholar
  • Snyder C, Irving LM, Anderson JR (1991) Hope and health: Measuring the will and the ways. Snyder CR, Forsyth DR, eds. Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective (Pergamon, New York), 285–305.Google Scholar
  • Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL (1996) Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(2):321–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub DW (1989) Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. 13(2):147–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub DW, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13:24.Google Scholar
  • Thatcher JB, Perrewé PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26(4):381–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Twyman NW, Lowry PB, Burgoon JK, Jay F, Nunamaker J (2014) Autonomous scientifically controlled screening systems for detecting information purposely concealed by individuals. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(3):106–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett D (2013) Using accountability to reduce access policy violations in information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):263–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett D (2015) A new approach to the problem of access policy violations: Increasing perceptions of accountability through the user interface. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. 11(4):342–365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Xiao N, Rao HR (2015) Research note—An exploration of risk characteristics of information security threats and related public information search behavior. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):619–633.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Warkentin M, Willison R (2009) Behavioral and policy issues in information systems security: The insider threat. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):101–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warkentin M, Johnston AC, Walden E, Straub DW (2016) Neural correlates of protection motivation for secure IT behaviors: An fMRI examination. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(3):194–215.Google Scholar
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J. Management 17(3):601–617.Google Scholar
  • Willison R, Warkentin M (2013) Beyond deterrence: An expanded view of employee computer abuse. MIS Quart. 37(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Workman M, Bommer WH, Straub DW (2008) Security lapses and the omission of information security measures: A threat control model and empirical test. Comput. Human Behav. 24(6):2799–2816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi S, Baumgartner H (2004) Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations. J. Consumer Psych. 14(3):303–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang P (2013) The affective response model: A theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Quart. 37(1):247–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman M (1983) The distinction between trait and state scales is not arbitrary: Comment on Allen and Potkay’s “On the arbitrary distinction between traits and states.” J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(5):1083–1086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.