Turning Liabilities of Global Operations into Assets: IT-Enabled Social Integration Capacity and Exploratory Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0890

References

  • Alexiev A, Jansen J, Bosch F, Volberda H (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. J. Management Stud. 47(7):1343–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen T, Foss N (2005) Strategic opportunity and economic performance in multinational enterprises: The role and effects of information and communication technology. J. Internat. Management 11(2):293–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris Y, Ransbotham S (2016) Knowledge entrepreneurship: Institutionalising wiki-based knowledge-management processes in competitive and hierarchical organisations. J. Inform. Tech. 31(2):226–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atasoy H, Banker R, Pavlou P (2016) On the longitudinal effects of IT use on firm-level employment. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):6–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baltagi BH, Wu PX (1999) Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR (1) disturbances. Econometric Theory 15(6):814–823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Research note—Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum CF (2006) An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beugelsdijk S, Maseland R, Hoorn A (2015) Are scores on Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture stable over time? A cohort analysis. Global Strategy J. 5(3):223–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beugelsdijk S, Kostova T, Kunst V, Spadafora E, Essen M (2018) Cultural distance and firm internationalization: A meta-analytical review and theoretical implications. J. Management 44(1):89–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond SR (2002) Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Econom. J. 1(2):141–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau M-C, Loch K, Robey D, Straub D (1998) Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. Acad. Management Executive 12(4):120–128.Google Scholar
  • Campbell J, Eden L, Miller S (2012) Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):84–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chari M, Devaraj S, David P (2007) International diversification and firm performance: Role of information technology investments. J. World Bus. 42(2):184–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Chen Y, Hsu P-H, Podolski EJ (2016) Be nice to your innovators: Employee treatment and corporate innovation performance. J. Corporate Finance 39(August):78–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi L, Ravichandran T, Andrevski G (2010) Information technology, network structure, and competitive action. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):543–570.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chirumalla K (2013) Managing knowledge for product-service system innovation: The role of web 2.0 technologies. Res. Tech. Management 56(2):45–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eden L, Miller S (2004) Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 187–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ettlie J, Pavlou P (2006) Technology‐based new product development partnerships. Decision Sci. 37(2):117–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flores RG, Aguilera RV (2007) Globalization and location choice: An analysis of US multinational firms in 1980 and 2000. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(7):1187–1210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao H, Hsu P-H, Li K (2018) Innovation strategy of private firms. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S (1987) Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management J. 8(5):425–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gómez J, Salazar I, Vargas P (2017) Does information technology improve open innovation performance? An examination of manufacturers in Spain. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):661–675.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez-Mejia L, Palich LE (1997) Cultural diversity and the performance of multinational firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 28(2):309–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez‐Mejia L, Makri M, Kintana M (2010) Diversification decisions in family‐controlled firms. J. Management Stud. 47(2):223–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray PH, Parise S, Iyer B (2011) Innovation impacts of using social bookmarking systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):629–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed (Pearson Ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D, Cho T, Chen M-J (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):659–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewett K, Roth M, Roth K (2003) Conditions influencing headquarters and foreign subsidiary roles in marketing activities and their effects on performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(6):567–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):547–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang P, Tafti A, Mithas S (2018) Platform sponsor’s investments and user contributions in knowledge communities: The role of knowledge seeding. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):213–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrahi MH, Sawyer S (2013) Social technologies, informal knowledge practices, and the enterprise. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 23(1–2):110–137.Google Scholar
  • Johnson B (2011) Nokia crisis highlights internal struggle. Accessed October 17, 2019, http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-12414595.Google Scholar
  • Joshi K, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kane GC, Alavi M, Labianca G, Borgatti SP (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):275–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons 53(1):59–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kettinger WJ, Marchand DA, Davis JM (2010) Designing enterprise IT architectures to optimize flexibility and standardization in global business. MIS Quart. Executive 9(2):95–113.Google Scholar
  • Kitchens B, Kumar A, Pathak P (2018) Electronic markets and geographic competition among small, local firms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):928–946.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koch H, Gonzalez E, Leidner D (2012) Bridging the work/social divide: The emotional response to organizational social networking sites. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(6):699–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch H, Leidner DE, Gonzalez ES (2013) Digitally enabling social networks: Resolving IT–culture conflict. Inform. Systems J. 23(6):501–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 19(3):411–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahiri N (2010) Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson R, Finkelstein S (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organ. Sci. 10(1):1–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonhardt D, Hanelt A, Huang P, Mithas S (2018) Does one size fit all? Theorizing governance configurations for digital innovation. Proc. 39th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, San Francisco): 1--17.Google Scholar
  • Leudar I (1991) Sociogenesis, coordination and mutualism. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 21(2):197–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D (2013a) The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with wikis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):455–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013b) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(1):38–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer T, Zignago S (2005) Market Access in Global and Regional Trade (CEPII, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Mayer T, Zignago S (2011) Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database, Working Paper 2011-25, CEPII, France.Google Scholar
  • McAfee A (2009) Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization’s Toughest Challenges (Harvard Business Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
  • McAfee AP (2006) Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):21--28.Google Scholar
  • McKinseyQuarterly (2016) The evolution of social technologies. Accessed October 17, 2019, http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/the-evolution-of-social-technologies?cid=digistrat-eml-alt-mkq-mck-oth-1606.Google Scholar
  • Mithas S, Tafti A, Mitchell W (2013) How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):511–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S, Whitaker J, Tafti A (2017) Information technology, revenues, and profits: Exploring the role of foreign and domestic operations. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):430–444.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morescalchi A, Pammolli F, Penner O, Petersen A, Riccaboni M (2015) The evolution of networks of innovators within and across borders: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 44(3):651–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morosini P, Shane S, Singh H (1998) National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 29(1):137–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neeley T, Leonardi P (2018) Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: Passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strategic Management J. 39(3):922–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nijman T, Verbeek M (1992) Nonresponse in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function. J. Appl. Econometrics 7(3):243–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Keefe M, Chen ET (2011) The impact of emergent web 2.0 on virtual teams. Comm. of the IIMA 11(2):91–106.Google Scholar
  • Ou CX, Pavlou PA, Davison RM (2014) Swift Guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):209–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park Y, Mithas S (2020) Organized complexity of digital business strategy: A configurational perspective. MIS Quart. 44(1):85–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Dimoka A (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):327–444.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfaffermayr M (1999) Ownership advantages, foreign production and productivity: Evidence from Austrian manufacturing firms. Rev. Ind. Organ. 15(4):379–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps C (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell KS, Rhee M (2016) Experience in different institutional environments and foreign subsidiary ownership structure. J. Management 42(6):1434–1461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ravichandran T, Liu Y, Han S, Hasan I (2009) Diversification and firm performance: Exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(4):205–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(4):625–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reus TH, Lamont BT (2009) The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(8):1298–1316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rojas MGA, Solis E, Zhu J (2018) Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy. Res. Policy 47(6):1111–1124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roodman D (2009a) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 9(1):86–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roodman D (2009b) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 71(1):135–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenzweig PM, Singh JV (1991) Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):340–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S (2005) Knowledge management using information technology: Determinants of short‐term impact on firm value. Decision Sci. 36(4):531–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saldanha TJ, Mithas S, Krishnan M (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):267–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saldanha TJ, Melville NP, Ramirez R, Richardson VJ (2013) Information systems for collaborating versus transacting: Impact on manufacturing plant performance in the presence of demand volatility. J. Oper. Management 31(6):313–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salomon R, Wu Z (2012) Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(4):343–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sargan J (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26(3):393–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shachaf P (2008) Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Inform. Management 45(2):131–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin D, Hasse VC, Schotter AP (2017) Multinational enterprises within cultural space and place: Integrating cultural distance and tightness–looseness. Acad. Management J. 60(3):904–921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slangen AH, Beugelsdijk S (2010) The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(6):980–995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava SC, Mithas S, Jha B (2013) What is your global innovation strategy? IEEE IT Professional 15(6):2–6.Google Scholar
  • Standing C, Kiniti S (2011) How can organizations use wikis for innovation? Technovation 31(7):287–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Subramaniam M, Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Management J. 48(3):450–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susarla A, Oh J-H, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tallman S, Phene A (2007) Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organ. Sci. 18(2):252–260.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P, Hitt LM (2013) Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Management Sci. 60(2):338–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Tanriverdi H (2018) Impact of the information technology unit on information technology-embedded product innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):716–751.Google Scholar
  • Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. 41(4):464–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venaik S, Midgley D, Devinney T (2005) Dual paths to performance: The impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(6):655–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verbeke A, Asmussen CG (2016) Global, local, or regional? The locus of MNE strategies. J. Management Stud. 53(6):1051–1075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner C (2004) Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(1):265–289.Google Scholar
  • Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wattal S, Racherla P, Mandviwalla M (2010) Network externalities and technology use: A quantitative analysis of intraorganizational blogs. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):145–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J. Econometrics 126(1):25–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wintoki MB, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. 105(3):581–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):509–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yayavaram S, Ahuja G (2008) Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):333–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang B, Pavlou PA, Krishnan R (2018) On direct versus indirect peer influence in large social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):292–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou Y (2014) Supervising across borders: The case of multinational hierarchies. Organ. Sci. 26(1):277–292.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.