Optimizing Two-Sided Promotion for Transportation Network Companies: A Structural Model with Conditional Bayesian Learning

References

• Ackerberg DA (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque P, Pavlidis P, Chatow U, Chen KY, Jamal Z (2012) Evaluating promotional activities in an online two-sided market of user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):406–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P (2005) Affirmative action in higher education: How do admission and financial aid rules affect future earnings? Econometrica 73(5):1477–1524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchholz N (2015) Spatial equilibrium, search frictions and efficient regulation in the taxi industry. Technical report, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BM (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Google Scholar
• California Public Utilities Commission (2013) Decision adopting rules and regulations to protect public safety while allowing new entrants to the transportation industry. Accessed September 9, 2018, http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M077/K112/77112285.PDF.Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Hamilton BH (2006) Learning, private information, and the economic evaluation of randomized experiments. J. Political Econom. 114(6):997–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Sun B, Singh V (2009) An empirical investigation of the dynamic effect of Marlboro’s permanent pricing shift. Marketing Sci. 28(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. NBER Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Crawford GS, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73(4):1137–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Sun B (2002) An empirical investigation of the spillover effects of advertising and sales promotions in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Sun B (2008) A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1111–1125.Link, Google Scholar
• Frechette GR, Lizzeri A, Salz T (2019) Frictions in a competitive, regulated market: Evidence from taxis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2954–2992.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Han SP (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Greenwood BN, Song Y (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes Benz: An empirical investigation of the sharing economy and durable goods purchase. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Robb R (1985) Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. J. Econom. 30(1–2):239–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Wu J, Tan Y (2017) Disconfirmation effect on online rating behavior: A structural model. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):626–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Vir Singh P, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamakura WA, Russel GJ (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. 26(4):379–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam C, Liu M (2018) More than taxis with an app: How ride-hailing platforms promote market efficiency. Working paper, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1978) Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: Some recent developments. Hensher D, Stopher P, eds. Behavioral Travel Modelling (Croom Helm London, London), 279–318.Google Scholar
• Park J, Kim J, Pang MS, Lee B (2017) Offender or guardian? An empirical analysis of ride-sharing and sexual assault. Working paper, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.Google Scholar
• Rhee KM, Zheng J, Wang T, Tan Y (2018) Technology restriction and demand shifts in transportation dynamics: an empirical study. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Wu C, Che H, Chan TY, Lu X (2015) The economic value of online reviews. Marketing Sci. 34(5):739–754.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Li B (2017) A quasi-experimental estimate of the impact of P2P transportation platforms on urban consumer patterns. Matwin S, Yu S, Farooq F, eds. Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1683–1692.Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang S, Narayan V, Zhao Y (2013) Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Sci. 32(1):153–169.Link, Google Scholar