Fashionable Consumer Technology, IT Fashion, and Consumer Behavior

References

• Abrahamson E (1996) Management fashion. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):254–285.Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Eisenman M (2008) Employee-management techniques: Transient fads or trending fashions? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):719–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Fairchild G (1999) Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):708–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive Absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Anatchkova MD, Bjorner JB (2010) Health and role functioning: The use of focus groups in the development of an item bank. Quality Life Res. 19(1):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anspach KA (1967) The Why of Fashion (Iowa State University Press, Iowa City).Google Scholar
• Arbore A, Graziani R, Venturini S (2014a) Understanding personal mobile technologies: Decomposing and De-averaging the value of a smartphone. J. Inform. Systems 28(1):167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arbore A, Soscia I, Bagozzi RP (2014b) The role of signaling identity in the adoption of personal technologies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(2):86–110.Google Scholar
• Atik D, Fırat AF (2013) Fashion creation and diffusion: The institution of marketing. J. Marketing Management 29:(7–8):836–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baddeley M (2010) Herding, social influence and economic decision-making: Socio-psychological and neuroscientific analyses. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 365(1538):281–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 16(1):74–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay I, Dann Z (2000) New-product-development performance evaluation: A product-complexity-based methodology. IEE Proc. Sci. Measurement Tech. 147(2):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard M (2007) Fashion Theory: A Reader (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Barnes L (2013) Fashion marketing. Textile Progress 45:(2–3):182–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception Psychophysics 8(5):279–286.Google Scholar
• Bertini M, Wathieu L, Iyengar SS (2012) The discriminating consumer: Product proliferation and willingness to pay for quality. J. Marketing Res. 49(1):39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Sharma S (2000) Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers 47(3):279–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumer H (1969) Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. Sociol. Quart. 10(3):275–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourne L (2017) 7 indisputable ways Michelle Obama changed the way you dress. Glamour (January 20), https://www.glamour.com/story/how-michelle-obama-changed-first-lady-fashion.Google Scholar
• Burke PJ (2004) Identities and social structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award address. Soc. Psych. Quart. 67(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke PJ, Stets JE (2009) Identity Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron TA, James MD (1987) Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: An alternative pre-test-market evaluation procedure. J. Marketing Res. 24(4):389–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter MS, Grover V (2015) Me, my self and I(T): Conceptualizing information technology (IT) identity and its implications. MIS Quart. 39(4):931–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri HR, Majumdar S (2006) Of diamonds and desires: Understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. 2006(11):1–18.Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods Bus. Res. 295(2):295–336.Google Scholar
• Choi J, Kim S (2016) Is the Smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Comput. Human Behav. (63):777–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cipriani M, Guarino A (2005) Herd behavior in a laboratory financial market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1427–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. 23(2):145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compen B, Pitthan F, Schelfhout W, De Witte K (2022) How to elicit and cease herding behaviour? On the effectiveness of a warning message as a debiasing decision support system. Decision Support Systems 152:113652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie WL (2011) Institutional Theory of Information Technology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1992) Fashion, Culture and Identity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean DH (1999) Brand endorsement, popularity, and event sponsorship as advertising cues affecting consumer pre-purchase attitudes. J. Advertising 28(3):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drehmann M, Oechssler J, Roider A (2005) Herding and contrarian behavior in financial markets: An internet experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1403–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunnette MD (1966) Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology. Amer. Psych. 21(4):343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farennikova A, Prinz J (2011) What makes something fashionable? Wolfendale J, Kennett J, eds. Fashion ‐ Philosophy for Everyone (Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ), 13–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gecas V, Schwalbe ML (1983) Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem. Soc. Psych. Quart. 46(2):77–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godek J, Murray KB (2008) Willingness to pay for advice: The role of rational and experiential processing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 106(1):77–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1):2–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X (2010) Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. J. Marketing 74(4):15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann WM (1991) Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(3):635–647.Google Scholar
• Herrman J (2019) How TikTok is rewriting the world. New York Times (March 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/10/style/what-is-tik-tok.html.Google Scholar
• Hidrue MK, Parsons GR, Kempton W, Gardner MP (2011) Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource Energy Econom. 33(3):686–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R, Klein HK, Lyytinen K (1995) Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoehle H, Venkatesh V (2015) Mobile application usability: Conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Quart. 39(2):435–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Hardie EA (1992) Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A self‐categorization analysis of group cohesiveness. British J. Soc. Psych. 31(1):41–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ, White KM (1995) A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 58(4):255–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg C, Koschate N, Hoyer WD (2005) Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. J. Marketing 69(2):84–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong S, Tam KY (2006) Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):162–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeong SC, Kim S-H, Park JY, Choi B (2017) Domain-specific innovativeness and new product adoption: A case of wearable devices. Telematics Informatics 34(5):399–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Agarwal R, Angst CM (2006) Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Quart. 30(4):781–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kastanakis MN, Balabanis G (2012) Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. J. Bus. Res. 65(10):1399–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution 2(1):51–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Palmisano S, Luu W, Iwasaki S (2021) Effects of linear visual-vestibular conflict on presence, perceived scene stability and cybersickness in the Oculus Go and oculus quest. Frontiers Virtual Reality 2:582156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A (1991) Effect of dealing patterns on consumer perceptions of deal frequency and willingness to pay. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):441–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Collar E (2003) Information technology fashions: Lifecycle phase analysis. Sprague J, Ralph H, eds. Proc. 36th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 8.Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long CP, Bendersky C, Morrill C (2011) Fairness monitoring: Linking managerial controls and fairness judgments in organizations. Acad. Management J. 54(5):1045–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn M, Snyder CR (2002) Uniqueness seeking. Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York), 395–410.Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Magni M (2015) Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. MIS Quart. 39(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mead GH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. Fashion. Accessed February 5, 2022, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fashion.Google Scholar
• Miller CM, McIntyre SH, Mantrala MK (1993) Toward formalizing fashion theory. J. Marketing Res. 30(2):142–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe KB (1990) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Nassar-McMillan SC, Borders LD (2002) Use of focus groups in survey item development. Qualitative Rep. 7(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Nystrom PH (1928) Economics of Fashion (Ronald Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Park HJ, Kim JY, Lee K-H (2022) Interplay between Tiktok & Generation Z: The trickle-up effect of #Thriftflip. Internat. Textile Apparel Assoc. Annual Conf. Proc. (Iowa State University Digital Press, Ames).Google Scholar
• Peer E, Rothschild D, Gordon A, Evernden Z, Damer E (2022) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 54(4):1643–1662.Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phau I, Lo CC (2004) Profiling fashion innovators. J. Fashion Marketing Management 8(4):399–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman K, Cherrier H (2010) Correlates of cool identity: Humor, need for uniqueness, materialism, status concern and brand consciousness. Advances Consumer Res. 37(1):886–888.Google Scholar
• Reynolds WH (1968) Cars and clothing: Understanding fashion trends. J. Marketing 32(3):44–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DE (1958) Fashion theory and product design. Harvard Bus. Rev. 36(6):126–138.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sapir E (1937) the contribution of psychiatry to an understanding of behavior in society. Amer. J. Sociol. 42(6):862–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang R-A, Chen Y-C, Shen L (2005) Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Inform. Management 42(3):401–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1957) Fashion. Amer. J. Sociol. 62(6):541–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ (1985) Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. J. Bus. Res. 13(3):195–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ, Samli AC (1985) A path analytic model of store loyalty involving self-concept, store image, geographic loyalty, and socioeconomic status. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 13(3):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproles GB (1979) Fashion: Consumer Behavior Toward Dress (Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Sullivan D (2012) Life in the iPhone 5 line: Fashion as a must-have ‘feature.’ CNET (September 21), http://www.cnet.com/news/life-in-the-iphone-5-line-fashion-as-a-must-have-feature/.Google Scholar
• Sun H (2013) A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. MIS Quart. 37(4):1013–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Luo F, London J, Jiao X (2014) Fashionable technology, fashion waves, and post-adoption regret and satisfaction. Karahanna E, Srinivasan A, Tan B, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 54.Google Scholar
• Swann WB (1983) Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Suls J, Greenwald AG, eds. Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol. 2 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 33–66.Google Scholar
• Teo H-H, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. 27(1):19–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA (1996) Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(8):776–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA, White KM (1999) The theory of planned behaviour: Self‐identity, social identity and group norms. British J. Soc. Psych. 38(3):225–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tey YS, Brindal M, Dibba H (2018) Factors influencing willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: A literature review. J. Global Fashion Marketing 9(2):129–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The NDP Group (2015) The demographic divide: Fitness trackers and smartwatches attracting very different segments of the market, according to the NPD Group. The NDP Group (January 6), https://www.prweb.com/releases/the_demographic_divide_fitness_trackers_and_smartwatches_attracting_very_different_segments_of_the_market_according_to_the_npd_group/prweb12425744.htm.Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Lawler EJ, ed. Advances in Group Process: Theory and Research (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–121.Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Tzou R-C, Lu H-P (2009) Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behav. Inform. Tech. 28(4):311–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. 28(4):695–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Google Scholar
• Vejlgaard H (2007) Anatomy of a Trend (McGraw Hill Professional, New York).Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P (2010) Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Quart. 34(1):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasson CR (1968) How predictable are fashion and other product life cycles? J. Marketing 32(3):36–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wells JD, Campbell DE, Valacich JS, Featherman M (2010) The effect of perceived novelty on the adoption of information technology innovations: A risk/reward perspective. Decision Sci. 41(4):813–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams J, Hadjistavropoulos T, Ghandehari OO, Malloy DC, Hunter PV, Martin RR (2016) Resilience and organisational empowerment among long‐term care nurses: Effects on patient care and absenteeism. J. Nursing Management 24(3):300–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Wong H, Iwai H (2005) The road to miniaturization. Phys. World 18(9):40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang C, Hsu Y-C (2011) Impact of ergonomic and social psychological perspective: A case study of fashion technology adoption in Taiwan. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 27(7):583–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y-C, Ying H, Jin Y, Cheng HK, Liang T-P (2021) Special issue editorial: Information systems research in the age of smart services. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(3):10.Google Scholar