Understanding the Dynamic and Episodic Nature of Technostressors and Their Effects on Cyberdeviance: A Daily Field Investigation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0273

References

  • Addas S, Pinsonneault A (2018) Email interruptions and individual performance: Is there a silver lining? MIS Quart. 42(2):381–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghaz A, Sheikh A (2016) Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector. Comput. Human Behav. 62(part C):51–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmad UNU, Amin SM, Ismail WKW (2014) Moderating effect of technostress inhibitors on the relationship between technostress creators and organisational commitment. J. Teknology 67(1):51–62.Google Scholar
  • Alnuaimi OA, Robert LP, Maruping LM (2010) Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):203–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnetz BB, Wiholm C (1997) Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices. J. Psychosomatic Res. 43(1):35–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quart. 35(4):831–858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psych. 37(2):122–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes CM, Lucianetti L, Bhave DP, Christian MS (2015) “You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy”: Leaders’ sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1419–1437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Muraven M, Tice DM (2000) Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Soc. Cognition 18(2):130–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beehr TA, Jex SM, Stacy BA, Murray MA (2000) Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. J. Organ. Behav. 21(4):391–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benlian A (2020) A daily field investigation of technology-driven stress spillovers from work to home. MIS Quart. 44(3):1259–1300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benlian A, Klumpe J, Hinz O (2020) Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: A multimethod investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 30(6):1010–1042.Google Scholar
  • Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Rev. Psych. 54(1):579–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breevaart K, Bakker AB (2018) Daily job demands and employee work engagement: The role of daily transformational leadership behavior. J. Occupational Health Psych. 23(3):338–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (2000) Research design and issues of validity. Reis HT, Judd CM, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (Cambridge University Press, New York), 3–16.Google Scholar
  • Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Triandis HC, Berry JW, eds. Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), 389–444.Google Scholar
  • Brod C (1984) Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bushman BJ, Bonacci AM, Pedersen WC, Vasquez EA, Miller N (2005) Chewing on it can chew you up: Effects of rumination on triggered displaced aggression. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(6):969–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee S, Sarker S, Valacich JS (2015) The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical IT use. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):49–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen A, Karahanna E (2018) Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quart. 42(4):1023–1042.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho S, Kim S (2022) Does a healthy lifestyle matter? A daily diary study of unhealthy eating at home and behavioral outcomes at work. J. Appl. Psych. 107(1):23–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi BCF, Jiang Z, Xiao B, Kim SS (2015) Embarrassing exposures in online social networks: An integrated perspective of privacy invasion and relationship bonding. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):675–694.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cipriani A (2023) What is digital overload and how to prevent it? Accessed September 23, https://nbold.co/what-is-digital-overload-and-how-to-prevent-it/.Google Scholar
  • Cleveland Clinic (2020) The benefits employees value most. Accessed March 10, https://www.bravowell.com/resources/benefits-packages-to-engage-the-workforce.Google Scholar
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper CL, Dewe PJ, O’Driscoll MP (2001) Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Arcy J, Teh PL (2019) Predicting employee information security policy compliance on a daily basis: The interplay of security-related stress, emotions, and neutralization. Inform. Management 56(7):103–151.Google Scholar
  • DeWall CN, Baumeister RF, Stillman TF, Gailliot MT (2007) Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(1):62–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diestel S, Rivkin W, Schmidt KH (2015) Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: Results from two diary studies. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):809–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dong L, Sun H, Fang Y (2007) Do perceived leadership behaviors affect user technology beliefs? An examination of the impact of project champions and direct managers. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(1):655–664.Google Scholar
  • Durward D, Blohm I (2017) I am a crowd worker – How individuals identify with a new form of digital work. Europ. Conf. Inform. Systems (Guimarães, Portugal), 1–11.Google Scholar
  • Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12(2):121–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagan MH, Neill S, Wooldridge BR (2004) An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 44(2):95–104.Google Scholar
  • Fisher CD, To ML (2012) Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 33(7):865–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D (2001) Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J. Vocational Behav. 59(3):291–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furnham A (1986) Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality Individual Differences 7(3):385–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galluch PS, Grover V, Thatcher JB (2015) Interrupting the workplace: Examining stressors in an information technology context. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(1):1–47.Google Scholar
  • García-Montes JM, Caballero-Munoz D, Perez-Alvarez M (2006) Changes in the self-resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media Culture Soc. 28(1):67–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Pavlou PA (2012) The boundaries of trust and risk: The quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):940–959.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerpott FH, Rivkin W, Unger D (2022) Stop and go, where is my flow? How and when daily aversive morning commutes are negatively related to employees’ motivational states and behaviour at work. J. Appl. Psych. 107(2):169–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gökçearslan Ş, Mumcu FK, Haşlaman T, Çevik YD (2016) Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Comput. Human Behav. 63(part C):639–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guthier C, Dormann C, Voelkle MC (2020) Reciprocal effects between job stressors and burnout: A continuous time meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psych. Bull. 146(12):1146–1173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gwebu KL, Wang J, Wang L (2018) The role of corporate reputation and crisis response strategies in data breach management. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):683–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hoehle H, Venkatesh V (2015) Mobile application usability: Conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Quart. 39(2):435–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24(5):623–641.Google Scholar
  • Hughes O (2022) Tech workers face a “burnout crisis” unless employers act now. Accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.zdnet.com/article/tech-workers-face-a-burnout-crisis-unless-employers-act-now/.Google Scholar
  • Hung WH, Chang LM, Lin CH (2011) Managing the risk of overusing mobile phones in the working environment: A study of ubiquitous technostress. Proc. 15th Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems 2011 (Queensland University of Technology and Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia).Google Scholar
  • Ilies R, Liu XY, Liu Y, Zheng X (2017) Why do employees have better family lives when they are highly engaged at work? J. Appl. Psych. 102(6):956–970.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • In Diverse Company (2021) How modern technology at the workplace affects mental health and what to do about it. Accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.indiversecompany.com/how-modern-technology-can-affect-mental-health-at-the-workplace-and-what-to-do-about-it/.Google Scholar
  • Jena R (2015) Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician. Comput. Human Behav. 51(B):1116–1123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang H, Jiang X, Sun P, Li X (2021) Coping with workplace ostracism: The roles of emotional exhaustion and resilience in deviant behavior. Management Decision 59(2):358–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Scott BA, Ilies R (2006) Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):126–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufman GM, Beehr TA (1989) Occupational stressors, individual strains, and social support among police officers. Human Relations 42(2):185–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khansa L, Kuem J, Siponen M, Kim SS (2017) To cyberloaf or not to cyberloaf: The impact of the announcement of formal organizational controls. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(1):141–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S, Park Y, Headrick L (2018) Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. J. Appl. Psych. 103(7):772–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kline RB (2011) Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. Williams M, Vogt WP, eds. Handbook of Methodological Innovation (Sage, London), 562–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R, Lal R, Bansal Y, Sharma SK (2013) Technostress in relation to job satisfaction and organisational commitment among IT professionals. Internat. J. Sci. Res. 3(12):1–3.Google Scholar
  • Laudon K, Laudon J (2017) Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firms (Pearson Education, Harlow, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Brockner J (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. J. Management 33(6):841–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS (1966) Psychological Stress and the Coping Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Li F, Chen T, Lai X (2018) How does a reward for creativity program benefit or frustrate employee creative performance? The perspective of transactional model of stress and coping. Group Organ. Management 43(1):138–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LinkedIn (2023) What is the cost of replacing an employee? Accessed September 12, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-cost-replacing-employee-jim-stroud.Google Scholar
  • Liu Y, Song Y, Koopmann J, Wang M, Chang CHD, Shi J (2017) Eating your feelings? Testing a model of employees’ work-related stressors, sleep quality, and unhealthy eating. J. Appl. Psych. 102(8):1237–1258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Wang M, Chang CH, Shi J, Zhou L, Shao R (2015) Work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: The moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):793–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(1):99–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Inform. Systems J. 25(3): 275–308.Google Scholar
  • Maier C, Laumer S, Wirth J, Weitzel T (2019) Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: A two-wave study with multiple data samples. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(5):496–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcus B, Schuler H (2004) Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 89(4):647–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mental Health America (2018) Eye opening new report shines spotlight on impact of workplace stress, mental health. Accessed May 8, 2020, https://www.mhanational.org/eye-opening-new-report-shines-spotlight-impact-workplace-stress-mental-health.Google Scholar
  • Microsoft (2022) Great expectations: Making hybrid work work. Accessed September 23, 2023, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/great-expectations-making-hybrid-work-work.Google Scholar
  • Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML (2007) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):1159–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moody GD, Siponen M, Pahnila S (2018) Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance. MIS Quart. 42(1):285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore JE (2000a) One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. MIS Quart. 24(1):141–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore JE (2000b) Why is this happening? A causal attribution approach to work exhaustion consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):335–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. 126(2):247–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Chellappa RK (2001) The role of perceived privacy and perceived security in the development of trust in electronic commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1):18–36.Google Scholar
  • Pinsonneault A, Rivard S (1998) Information technology and the nature of managerial work: From the productivity paradox to the Icarus paradox? MIS Quart. 22(3):287–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Selig JP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Comm. Methods Measures 6(2):77–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol. Methods 15(3):209–233.Google Scholar
  • Ragu-Nathan T, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):417–433.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reinke K, Gerlach G, Tarafdar M, Stock RM (2016) ICT-based communication events as triggers of stress: A mixed methods study. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland).Google Scholar
  • Reis HT, Judd CM (2000) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Robinson SL, Bennett RJ (1995) A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Management J. 38(2):555–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S, Ahuja M, Sarker S (2018) Work-life conflict of globally distributed software development personnel: An empirical investigation using border theory. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):103–126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Kalimo R (1995) The general burnout inventory: A self-report questionnaire to assess burnout at the workplace. Proc. Work, Stress Health 95: Creating Healthier Workplaces (Washington, DC), 10–23.Google Scholar
  • Shaina T (2020) About 56.5 hours lost per employee due to technology-related stress. Singapore Business Review (March 30), https://sbr.com.sg/hr-education/news/about-565-hours-lost-employee-due-technologyrelated-stress.Google Scholar
  • Sheikh A, Atashgah MS, Adibzadegan M (2015) The antecedents of cyberloafing: A case study in an Iranian copper industry. Comput. Human Behav. 51(part A):172–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi S, Chen Y, Cheung CM (2023) How technostressors influence job and family satisfaction: Exploring the role of work–family conflict. Inform. Systems J. 33(4):953–985.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shu Q, Tu Q, Wang K (2011) The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 27(10):923–939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siponen M, Vance A (2010) Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quart. 34(3):487–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava SC, Chandra S, Shirish A (2015) Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inform. Systems J. 25(4):355–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan T (2015) Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inform. Systems J. 25(2):103–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan T (2010) Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):303–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan BS, Ragu-Nathan T (2007) The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(1):301–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan T, Ragu-Nathan BS (2011) Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Comm. ACM 54(9):113–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Templeton (2022) 130+ best digital transformation statistics for 2023 and beyond. Accessed September 23, 2023, https://www.templeton-recruitment.com/tech-news/130-best-digital-transformation-statistics-for-2023-and-beyond.Google Scholar
  • Thatcher JB, Perrewé PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26(4):381–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trougakos JP, Hideg I, Cheng BH, Beal DJ (2014) Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Acad. Management J. 57(2):405–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tu Q, Wang K, Shu Q (2005) Computer-related technostress in China. Comm. ACM 48(4):77–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Cheung CM, Davis FD, Lee ZWY (2023) Cyberslacking in the workplace: Antecedents and effects on job performance. MIS Quart. 47(1):281–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman S, Cheung CM, Lee ZW, Davis FD, Venkatesh V (2018) The “Darth” side of technology use: An inductively derived typology of cyberdeviance. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1060–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace JE (1997) It’s about time: A study of hours worked and work spillover among law firm lawyers. J. Vocational Behav. 50(2):227–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Gupta M, Rao HR (2015) Insider threats in a financial institution: Analysis of attack-proneness of information systems applications. MIS Quart. 39(1):91–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Li X, Hsieh JJPA (2013) The contingent effect of personal IT innovativeness and IT self-efficacy on innovative use of complex IT. Behav. Inform. Tech. 32(11):1105–1124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weatherbee TG (2010) Counterproductive use of technology at work: Information & communications technologies and cyberdeviancy. Human Resource Management Rev. 20(1):35–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wehrt W, Casper A, Sonnentag S (2020) Beyond depletion: Daily self-control motivation as an explanation of self-control failure at work. J. Organ. Behav. 41(9):931–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheeler L, Reis HT (1991) Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. J. Personality 59(3):339–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willison R, Warkentin M (2013) Beyond deterrence: An expanded view of employee computer abuse. MIS Quart. 37(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong KCK, O’Driscoll MP (2018) Work antecedents, Confucian work values, and work-to-family interference in Hong Kong: A longitudinal study. Internat. J. Stress Management 25(1):60–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright TA, Cropanzano R (1998) Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):486–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu F, Luo XL, Hsu C (2020) Anger or fear? Effects of discrete emotions on employee’s computer-related deviant behavior. Inform. Management 57(3):103180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin P, Davison RM, Bian Y, Wu J, Liang L (2014) The sources and consequences of mobile technostress in the workplace. Proc. 18th Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems 2014 (Chengdu, China).Google Scholar
  • Zhang X, Fang Y, He W, Zhang Y, Liu X (2019) Epistemic motivation, task reflexivity, and knowledge contribution behavior on team wikis: A cross-level moderation model. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 70(5):448–461.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.