Does Help Help? An Empirical Analysis of Social Desirability Bias in Ratings

References

• Ai C, Chen X (2003) Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions. Econometrica 71(6):1795–1843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antin J, Shaw A (2012) Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: A study of Amazon Mechanical Turk in the US and India. Konstan JA, ed. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2925–2934.Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hong H (2006) Semiparametric estimation of a dynamic game of incomplete information. NBER Working Paper No. t0320, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hong H, Krainer J, Nekipelov D (2010) Estimating static models of strategic interactions. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 28(4):469–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Boyd JH, Mellman RE (1980) The effect of fuel economy standards on the US automotive market: A hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Res. Part A General 14(5–6):367–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardell NS, Dunbar FC (1980) Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing. Transportation Res. Part A General 14(5–6):423–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson L, Grossbart S (1988) Parental style and consumer socialization of children. J. Consumer Res. 15(1):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X (2007) Large sample sieve estimation of semi-nonparametric models. Handbook Econometrics 6:5549–5632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciccarelli S, White J (2014) Psychology, 4th ed. (Pearson Education).Google Scholar
• Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1964) The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Gao G, Narayan R (2010) Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodou D, de Winter JC (2014) Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Comput. Human Behav. (36):487–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards AL (1953) The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. J. Appl. Psych. 37(2):90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):303–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao GG, Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, McCullough J (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geetha M, Singha P, Sinha S (2017) Relationship between customer sentiment and online customer ratings for hotels-an empirical analysis. Tourism Management 61:43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung CM (2014) ‘Popularity effect’ in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 37(8):681–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Chintagunta PK (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):128–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig‐Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word‐of‐mouth via consumer‐opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Wu J, Tan Y (2017) Disconfirmation effect on online rating behavior: A structural model. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):626–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA, Zhang J (2009) Why do online product reviews have a J-shaped distribution? Overcoming biases in online word-of-mouth communication. Comm. ACM 52(10):144–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Smith MD (2014) The dynamic efficiency costs of common-pool resource exploitation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):4071–4103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Hong Y, Burtch G (2017) Social network integration and user content generation: Evidence from natural experiments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hüning M (2005) TextStat Simple Text Analysis Tool (Dutch Linguistics, Free University of Berlin, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Hutto C, Gilbert E (2014) Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proc. International AAAI Conf. on Web and Social Media 8(1):216–225.Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Zheng J, Huang J, Tan Y (2018) Generating content under the “spotlight” of friends: A natural experiment. Working paper, University of Washington.Google Scholar
• King MF, Bruner GC (2000) Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psych. Marketing 17(2):79–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR (2019) Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Loria S, Keen P, Honnibal M, Yankovsky R, Karesh D, Dempsey E (2014) TextBlob: Simplified text processing, Python library.Google Scholar
• Lu T, Zhang X, Yuan M, Wang A (2023) Distribution polarization effect in consumer choice. Manage. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Lynch J (1982) On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. (1981) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 42(2):109–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullagh P (2005) Proportional‐odds model. Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK), 3560–3563.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers Econometrics (Academic press, Cambridge, MA), 105–142.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. Karlqvist A, Snickars F, Weibull J, eds. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (North Holland, Amsterdam), 75–96.Google Scholar
• McLaughlin GH (1969) SMOG grading—A new readability formula. J. Readability 12(8):639–646.Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Trusov M (2011) The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):444–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore EM, Bearden WO, Teel JE (1985) Use of labeling and assertions of dependency in appeals for consumer support. J. Consumer Res. 12(1):90–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Zhang JQ (2011) Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. J. Retailing 87(4):598–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations Trends Inform. Retrieval 2(1–2):1–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, et al. (2011) Scikit-Learn: Machine learning in python. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12:2825–2830.Google Scholar
• Phillips DL, Clancy KJ (1970) Response biases in field studies of mental illness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(3):503–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Kumar S (2017) Understanding voluntary knowledge provision and content contribution through a social-media-based prediction market: A field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):529–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Richins ML, Dawson S (1992) A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):303–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2005) Posting vs. lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. J. Consumer Res. 32(2):260–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Lerman D (2007) Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):76–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Hu YJ, Rees J (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behaviors. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(3):683–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shriver SK, Nair HS, Hofstetter R (2013) Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Sci. 59(6):1425–1443.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang X, Hann IH (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ren Y, Adomavicius G (2019) Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):839–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) Research note—When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Ying Y, Feinberg F, Wedel M (2006) Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2016) Estimation of beauty contest auctions. Marketing Sci. 35(1):27–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang JQ, Craciun G, Shin D (2010) When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. J. Bus. Res. 63(12):1336–1341.Crossref, Google Scholar