More than Words in Medical Question-and-Answer Sites: A Content-Context Congruence Perspective

References

• Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):796–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Altarriba J, Bauer LM (2004) The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. Amer. J. Psych. 117(3):389–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altarriba J, Bauer LM, Benvenuto C (1999) Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 31(4):578–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 13(3):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avnet T, Higgins ET (2006) How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantum EOC, Owen JE (2009) Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psych. Assessment 21(1):79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J (2008) Opportunism, knowledge, and the performance of franchise chains. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1451–1463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry DS, Pennebaker JW, Mueller JS, Hiller WS (1997) Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(5):526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradac JJ, Bowers JW, Courtright JA (1979) Three language variables in communication research: Intensity, immediacy, and diversity. Human Comm. Res. 5(3):257–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brysbaert M, Warriner AB, Kuperman V (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 46(3):904–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campos A (1989) Emotional values of words: Relations with concreteness and vividness of imagery. Perceptual Motor Skills 69(2):495–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chartrand TL, van Baaren RB, Bargh JA (2006) Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping. J. Experiment. Psych. General 135(1):70–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ho T-H, Kim Y-M (2010) Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google Answers. J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):641–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung CMK, Thadani DR (2012) The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems 54(1):461–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung CM-Y, Sia C-L, Kuan KKY (2012) Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an elm perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(8):618–635.Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psych. Rev. 82(6):407–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comscore (2013) Comscore Media Metrix ranks top 50 U.S. web properties for February 2013. Accessed April 28, 2013, http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/3/comScore_Media_Metrix_Ranks_Top_50_U.S._Web_Properties_for_February_2013.Google Scholar
• Cornejo C (2018) Social life of health information. Accessed July 16, 2019, https://www.wegohealth.com/2018/02/05/social-life-of-health-information/.Google Scholar
• Cousins KAQ, Ash S, Olm CA, Grossman M (2018) Longitudinal changes in semantic concreteness in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (SVPPA). eNeuro 5(6):e0197–0118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daugherty T, Eastin MS, Bright L (2008) Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. J. Interactive Advertising 8(2):16–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David FR, Pearce JA, Randolph WA (1989) Linking technology and structure to enhance group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 74(2):233–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psych. Inquiry 11(4):227–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewhurst SA, Parry LA (2000) Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience. Eur. J. Cognitive Psych. 12(4):541–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DuBay WH (2004) The principles of readability. Impact Information, accessed February 16, 2020, http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf.Google Scholar
• Edelman B (2012) Earnings and ratings at Google Answers. Econom. Inquiry 50(2):309–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2008) Person–environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):167–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem SA, Harrison-Walker LJ (2006) The role of the internet in physician–patient relationships: The issue of trust. Bus. Horizons 49(5):387–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira MA, Massa M, Matos P (2010) Shareholders at the gate? Institutional investors and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(2):601–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman P (2011) A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites. J. Inform. Sci. 37(5):476–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Kohli R, Krishnan R (2011) Editorial overview—The role of information systems in healthcare: Current research and future trends. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):419–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Freitas AL, Gollwitzer P, Trope Y (2004) The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(6):739–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freling TH, Vincent LH, Henard DH (2014) When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):95–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita F, Diener E, Sandvik E (1991) Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(3):427–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious (Viking Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Wänke M (2010) Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36(11):1576–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harper FM, Moy D, Konstan JA (2009) Facts or friends? Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 759–768.Google Scholar
• Harper FM, Raban D, Rafaeli S, Konstan JA (2008) Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 865–874.Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2000) Making a good decision: Value from fit. Amer. Psych. 55(11):1217–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (2005) Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 14(4):209–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho CKY, Ke W, Liu H (2015) Choice decision of e-learning system: Implications from construal level theory. Inform. Management 52(2):160–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman BJ, Woehr DJ (2006) A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 68(3):389–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holman H, Lorig K (2004) Patient self-management: A key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 119(3):239–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Tan C-H, Ke W, Wei K-K (2013) Comprehension and assessment of product reviews: A review-product congruity proposition. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(3):311–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Tan CH, Ke W, Wei KK (2018) Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(6):503–522.Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Polman E (2016) Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. J. Consumer Psych. 26(4):474–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen ML, Averbeck JM, Zhang Z, Wright KB (2013) Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeon GY, Kim Y-M, Chen Y (2010) Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online Q&A site. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 325–328.Google Scholar
• Jones Q, Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2004) Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):194–210.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahn JH, Tobin RM, Massey AE, Anderson JA (2007) Measuring emotional expression with the linguistic inquiry and word count. Amer. J. Psych. 120(2):263–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller RT (1994) Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Acad. Management J. 37(1):167–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2008) A Guide to Econometrics, 6th ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kensinger EA, Corkin S (2003) Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory Cognition 31(8):1169–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Oh S (2009) Users’ relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(4):716–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Rao AR, Lee AY (2009) It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 35(6):877–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Oh JS, Oh S (2007) Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective. Proc. 70th Annual Meeting Amer. Inform. Sci. Tech. (American Society for Information Science and Technology, Silver Springs, MD), 1–15.Google Scholar
• Kivits J (2006) Informed patients and the internet: A mediated context for consultations with health professionals. J. Health Psych. 11(2):269–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korfiatis N, García-Bariocanal E, Sánchez-Alonso S (2012) Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 11(3):205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krumm J, Davies N, Narayanaswami C (2008) User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4):10–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrimore L, Jiang L, Larrimore J, Markowitz D, Gorski S (2011) Peer to peer lending: The relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 39(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawhon L (2016) New health union survey reveals importance of online health communities. Accessed July 16, 2019, https://health-union.com/news/online-health-experience-survey/.Google Scholar
• Lee S-Y, Rui H, Whinston AB (2019) Is best answer really the best answer? The politeness bias. MIS Quart. 43(2):579–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Huang L, Tan C-H, Wei K-K (2013) Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 17(4):101–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou J, Fang Y, Lim KH, Peng JZ (2013) Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Techn. 64(2):356–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Homburg C (2007) Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. J. Marketing 71(2):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio SJ, Trope Y, Liberman N (2013) The common currency of psychological distance. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(4):278–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb). 22(3):276–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLeod SD (1998) The quality of medical information on the internet: A new public health concern. Arch. Ophthalmology 116(12):1663–1665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CH, Lane LT, Deatrick LM, Young AM, Potts KA (2007) Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Comm. Res. 33(2):219–240.Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnane K, Phelps MP, Malmberg K (1999) Context-dependent recognition memory: The ice theory. J. Experiment. Psych. General 128(4):403–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murrow EJ, Oglesby FM (1996) Acute and chronic illness: Similarities, differences and challenges. Orthopaedic Nursing 15(5):47–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh S, Worrall A (2013) Health answer quality evaluation by librarians, nurses, and users in social Q&A. Library Inform. Sci. Res. 35(4):288–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh W, Pinsonneault A (2007) On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quart. 31(2):239–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM (2006) Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 20(2):139–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM (2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends Cognitive Sci. 12(6):237–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otterbacher J, Hemphill L, Dekker E (2011) Helpful to you is useful to me: The use and interpretation of social voting. Proc. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 48(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkes M, Jewell DP (2001) The management of severe Crohn’s disease. Alimentary Pharmacology Therapeutics 15(5):563–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Francis ME (1996) Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition Emotion 10(6):601–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME (2007) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (Liwc2007) (LIWC, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Perrin EC, Newacheck P, Pless IB, Drotar D, Gortmaker SL, Leventhal J, Perrin JM, Stein REK, Walker DK, Weitzman M (1993) Issues involved in the definition and classification of chronic health conditions. Pediatrics 91(4):787–793.Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Lurie NH, Liu H (2019) Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: How are mobile reviews different? Marketing Sci. 38(5):733–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Reber R, Schwarz N (1999) Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness Cognition 8(3):338–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rideout V, Fox S (2018) Digital health practices, social media use, and mental well-being among teens and young adults in the U.S. Accessed July 16, 2019, https://www.hopelab.org/reports/pdf/a-national-survey-by-hopelab-and-well-being-trust-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2014) Listening in on social media: A joint model of sentiment and venue format choice. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah C, Pomerantz J 2010. Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA. Proc. 33rd Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machenery, New York), 411–418.Google Scholar
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277(15):1244–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ML (2009) Application-specific R&D capabilities and the advantage of incumbents: Evidence from the anticancer drug market. Management Sci. 55(8):1409–1422.Link, Google Scholar
• Stricker P 2014. Social media: An emerging communication modality. Accessed July 16, 2019, http://www.naylornetwork.com/cmsatoday/articles/index-v2.asp?aid=296436&issueID=30171.Google Scholar
• Tan SS-L, Goonawardene N (2017) Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. J. Medical Internet Res. 19(1):e9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Language Soc. Psych. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor H (2011) The Growing Influence and Use of Health Care Information Obtained Online (Harris Insights & Analytics, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2014) Imprint–environment fit and performance: How organizational munificence at the time of hire affects subsequent job performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):639–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2011) Construal level theory. Lange PAMV, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 118–134.Google Scholar
• Tse C-S, Altarriba J (2009) The word concreteness effect occurs for positive, but not negative, emotion words in immediate serial recall. British J. Psych. 100(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):423–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakslak C, Trope Y (2009) The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psych. Sci. 20(1):52–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber Shandwick (2018) The great American search for healthcare information. Accessed February 16, 2020, https://www.webershandwick.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Healthcare-Info-Search-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• White K, MacDonnell R, Dahl DW (2011) It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):472–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willemsen LM, Neijens PC, Bronner F, de Ridder JA (2011) “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 17(1):19–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkielman P, Cacioppo JT (2001) Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):989–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkielman P, Huber DE, Kavanagh L, Schwarz N (2012) Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. Gawronski B, Strack F, eds. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition (Guilford Press, New York), 89–111.Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2014) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quart. 38(2):539–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2017) Keep your cool or let it out: Nonlinear effects of expressed arousal on perceptions of consumer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 54(3):447–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang P (2016) Interactions and user-perceived helpfulness in diet information social questions & answers. Health Inform. Libraries J. 33(4):295–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Xie J (2011) Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):486–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zochling J, Grill E, Scheuringer M, Liman W, Stucki G, Braun J (2006) Identification of health problems in patients with acute inflammatory arthritis, using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Clinical Experiment. Rheumatology 24(3):239–246.Google Scholar