Deal or No Deal? Online Deals, Retailer Heterogeneity, and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive Environment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0933

References

  • Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2013) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Google Scholar
  • Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT Jr, Wang G (2015) Relationships among minimum requirements, Facebook likes, and Groupon deal outcomes. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 6(3):9:1–9:28.Google Scholar
  • Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT Jr, Wang G (2017) How e-WOM and local competition drive local retailers’ decisions about daily deal offerings. Decision Support Systems 101:82–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for internet platforms. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(2):171–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. 19(2):185–200.Google Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman NV (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quart. 37(2):471–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom Perspect. 12(3):151–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biswas A, Bhowmick S, Guha A, Grewal D (2013) Consumer evaluations of sale prices: Role of the subtraction principle. J. Marketing 77(4):49–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg RC, Briesch R, Fox EJ (1995) How promotions work. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G122–G132.Google Scholar
  • Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • BrightLocal (2017) Local consumer review survey 2017 and the impact of online reviews. Accessed February 1, 2017, https://www.brightlocal.com/learn/local-consumer-review-survey/.Google Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byers JW, Mitzenmacher M, Zervas G (2012a) Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. Adar E, Teevan J, eds. Proc. 5th ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, WSDM ’12. (ACM, New York), 543–552.Google Scholar
  • Byers JW, Mitzenmacher M, Zervas G (2012b) The Groupon effect on Yelp ratings: A root cause analysis. Faltings B, ed. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC ’12 (ACM, New York), 248–265.Google Scholar
  • Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao Z, Hui KL, Xu H (2018) When discounts hurt sales: The case of daily-deal markets. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):567–591.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carter NM, Stearns TM, Reynolds PD, Miller BA (1994) New venture strategies: Theory development with an empirical base. Strategic Management J. 15(1):21–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Kirmani A (2015) Posting strategically: The consumer as an online media planner. J. Consumer Psych. 25(4):609–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clifford S, Miller CC (2012) Ready to ditch the deal. New York Times (August 18), https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/18/technology/merchants-and-shoppers-sour-on-daily-deal-sites-like-groupon.html.Google Scholar
  • Debo LG, Veeraraghavan SK (2009) Models of herding behavior in operations management. Tang CS, Netessine S, eds. Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Management Models, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 131 (Springer, Boston), 81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Della Bitta AJ, Monroe KB, McGinnis JM (1981) Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. J. Marketing Res. 18(4):416–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia UM (2010) How effective are Groupon promotions for businesses? Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
  • Dholakia UM (2011a) What makes Groupon promotions profitable for businesses? Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
  • Dholakia UM (2011b) How businesses fare with daily deals: A multi-site analysis of Groupon, Livingsocial, Opentable, Travelzoo, and BuyWithMe promotions. Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
  • Dholakia UM (2012) How businesses fare with daily deals as they gain experience: A multi-time period study of daily deal performance. Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
  • Dizik A (2017) Small businesses are returning to Groupon. Wall Street J. (May 1), https://www.wsj.com/articles/small-businesses-are-returning-to-groupon-1493604000.Google Scholar
  • Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2009) Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 33(1):23–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Jaffe S, Kominers SD (2016) To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Lett. 27(1):39–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J (2011) Groupon is ruining your neighborhood: It’s the crack cocaine of small business. Accessed February 7, 2017, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/groupon-is-ruining-your-neighborhood-its-the-crack-cocaine-of-small-business/.Google Scholar
  • Ehrenberg ASC, Hammond K, Goodhart GJ (1994) The after-effects of price-related consumer promotions. J. Advertising Res. 34(4):11–22.Google Scholar
  • Eisenbeiss M, Wilken R, Skiera B, Cornelissen M (2015) What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 32(4):387–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enberg J (2019) Global digital ad spending 2019. eMarketer (March 28), https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-digital-ad-spending-2019.Google Scholar
  • Entrepreneur (2015) How to start a restaurant. Entrepreneur. Accessed February 2, 2017, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/73384.Google Scholar
  • Erickson GM, Johansson JK (1985) The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 12(2):195–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farahat A, Ahmed NK, Dholakia U (2012) Does a daily deal promotion signal a distressed business? An empirical investigation of small business survival. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  • Fields R (2014) Restaurant Success by the Numbers: A Money-Guy’s Guide to Opening the Next New Hot Spot, 2nd ed. (Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman JK, Cryder CE, Cheema A (2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. J. Behav. Decision Making 26(3):213–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenleaf EA (1995) The impact of reference price effects on the profitability of price promotions. Marketing Sci. 14(1):82–104.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Roggeveen AL, Nordfält J (2017) The future of retailing. J. Retailing 93(1):1–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Krishnan R, Baker J, Borin N (1998) The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. J. Retailing 74(3):331–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groupon (2019) Online marketing resources for local businesses. Accessed June 1, 2019, https://www.groupon.com/merchant/resources.Google Scholar
  • Gu B, Park J, Konana P (2011) Research note—The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):182–196.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S, Weaver R, Keiningham T, Williams L (2012) Are daily deals good for merchants? Harvard Business School Background Note 513-059, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB (2008) The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hu M, Dang I, Chintagunta P (2019) Search and learning at a daily deals website. Marketing Sci. 38(4):609–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • IBIS (2019) Daily deals sites in the US market research report. Accessed June 1, 2019, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/market-research-reports/daily-deals-sites-industry/Google Scholar
  • Integreon (2012) The Groupon effect—Harness the behavior, not the deal. Accessed February 1, 2017, http://www.integreon.com/BlogDetails?BGID=238.Google Scholar
  • Ipeirotis PG (2010) Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace. XRDS 17(2):16–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jamieson LF, Bass FM (1989) Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):336–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalyanaram G, Winer RS (1995) Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G161–G169.Google Scholar
  • Kannan PK, Li HA (2017) Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 34(1):22–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan PK, Yim CKB (2001) An investigation of the impact of promotions on across-submarket competition. J. Bus. Res. 53(3):137–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimes S, Dholakia UM (2011) Restaurant daily deals: Customers’ responses to social couponing. Cornell Hospitality Rep. 11(20):6–18.Google Scholar
  • Kirmani A (1990) The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. J. Consumer Res. 17(2):160–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A (1997) Advertising repetition as a signal of quality: If it’s advertised so much, something must be wrong. J. Advertising 26(3):77–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A, Wright P (1989) Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. J. Consumer Res. 16(3):344–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kitchens B, Kumar A, Pathak P (2018) Electronic markets and geographic competition among small, local firms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):928–946.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krasnova H, Veltri NF, Spengler K, Günther O (2013) “Deal of the day” platforms: What drives consumer loyalty? Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 5(3):165–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar V, Leone RP (1988) Measuring the effect of retail store promotions on brand and store substitution. J. Marketing Res. 25(2):178–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar V, Rajan B (2012) Social coupons as a marketing strategy: A multifaceted perspective. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(1):120–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancellotti MP, Thomas S (2018) Men hate it, women love it: Guilty pleasure advertising messages. J. Bus. Res. 85:271–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaPonsie M (2019) 6 things you should know about Groupon. US News World Rep. (April 25), https://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/saving-and-budgeting/articles/things-you-should-know-about-groupon.Google Scholar
  • Lee L, Tsai CI (2014) How price promotions influence postpurchase consumption experience over time. J. Consumer Res. 40(5):943–959.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Shen Q, Bart Y (2017) Local market characteristics and online-to-offline commerce: An empirical analysis of Groupon. Management Sci. 64(4):1860–1878.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li X (2016) Could deal promotion improve merchants’ online reputations? The moderating role of prior reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):171–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Hitt LM (2010) Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. MIS Quart. 34(4):809–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Wu L (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. MIS Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowengart O (2002) Reference price conceptualisations: An integrative framework of analysis. J. Marketing Management 18(1–2):145–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu X, Ba S, Huang L, Feng Y (2013) Promotional marketing or word-of-mouth? Evidence from online restaurant reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):596–612.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X, Andrews M, Song Y, Aspara J (2013) Group-buying deal popularity. J. Marketing 78(2):20–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch JG, Ariely D (2000) Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Sci. 19(1):83–103.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marinesi S, Girotra K, Netessine S (2017) The operational advantages of threshold discounting offers. Management Sci. 64(6):2690–2708.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McArdle M (2012) Trouble in coupon land. Daily Beast (November 30), http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/30/trouble-in-coupon-land.html.Google Scholar
  • McDougall P, Robinson RB (1990) New venture strategies: An empirical identification of eight ‘archetypes’ of competitive strategies for entry. Strategic Management J. 11(6):447–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2005) Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing 69(4):201–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mollen A, Wilson H (2010) Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. J. Bus. Res. 63(9):919–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mulhern FJ, Padgett DT (1995) The relationship between retail price promotions and regular price purchases. J. Marketing 59(4):83–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raghubir P, Corfman KP (1995) When do price promotions signal quality? The effect of dealing on perceived service quality. NA Adv. Consumer Res. 22:58–61.Google Scholar
  • Raghubir P, Corfman K (1999) When do price promotions affect pretrial brand evaluations? J. Marketing Res. 36(2):211–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raju JS (1992) The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Sci. 11(3):207–220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao AR, Monroe KB (1988) The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 15(2):253–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao AR, Monroe KB (1989) The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):351–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raz O, Ert E (2008) “Size counts”: The effect of queue length on choice between similar restaurants. Adv. Consumer Res. 35:803.Google Scholar
  • Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman R, Tellis G (2002) Does manufacturer advertising suppress or stimulate retail price promotions? Analytical model and empirical analysis. J. Retailing 78(4):253–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shivendu S, Zhang Z (2013) Economics of daily-deal websites: Advertising and sampling effects. Baskerville R, Chau M, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems ICIS 2013, (AIS/ICIS, Atlanta), 1340–1356.Google Scholar
  • Silverstein S (2013) How to decide to use ‘daily deal’ sites. Bus. J. (October 11), http://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/how-to/marketing/2013/10/how-to-decide-to-use-daily-deal-sites.html.Google Scholar
  • Smith KH, Natesan NC (1999) Consumer price-quality beliefs: Schema variables predicting individual differences. Adv. Consumer Res. 26(1):562–568.Google Scholar
  • Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J. Statist. Software 59(5):1–38.Google Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trefis Team, Great Speculations (2019) Groupon’s presence AI acquisition is a good deal if it didn’t cost more than $350 million. Forbes (August 29, 2019), https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/08/29/groupons-presence-ai-acquisition-is-a-good-deal-if-it-didnt-cost-more-than-350-million/#31c101174380.Google Scholar
  • Valette-Florence P, Guizani H, Merunka D (2011) The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity. J. Bus. Res. 64(1):24–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Völckner F, Sattler H (2005) Separating negative and positive effects of price with choice-based conjoint analyses. Marketing ZFP 27(JRM 1):5–13.Google Scholar
  • Walters RG (1991) Assessing the impact of retail price promotions on product substitution, complementary purchase, and interstore sales displacement. J. Marketing 55(2):17–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang A (2006) Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. J. Advertising Res. 46(4):355–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winer RS (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):250–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wirtz J, Aksoy L, van Riel A, Kandampully J, den Ambtman A, Bloemer J, Horváth C, et al. (2013) Managing brands and customer engagement in online brand communities. J. Service Management 24(3):223–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu B, Petroshius S, Newell S (2004) The impact of store image, frequency of discount, and discount magnitude on consumers’ value perceptions and search intention. Marketing Management J. 14(1):14–29.Google Scholar
  • Wu J, Shi M, Hu M (2014) Threshold effects in online group buying. Management Sci. 61(9):2025–2040.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yadav MS, Seiders K (1998) Is the price right? Understanding contingent processing in reference price formation. J. Retailing 74(3):311–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yoon S, Oh S, Song S, Kim KK, Kim Y (2014) Higher quality or lower price? How value-increasing promotions affect retailer reputation via perceived value. J. Bus. Res. 67(10):2088–2096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.