Leveraging Context: Re-Thinking Research Processes to Make “Contributions to Theory”

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0048

References

  • Abubakre M, Faik I, Mkansi M (2021) Digital entrepreneurship and indigenous value systems: An Ubuntu perspective. Inform. Systems J. 31(6):838–862.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ågerfalk PJ (2014) Insufficient theoretical contribution: A conclusive rationale for rejection? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(6):593–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2007) Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1265–1281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barash DP (2018) Through a Glass Brightly: Using Science to See Our Species as We Really Are (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Blut M, Chong AYL, Tsigna Z, Venkatesh V (2022) Meta-analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Challenging its validity and charting a research agenda in the red ocean. J. Assoc. Informs. Systems 23(1):13–95.Google Scholar
  • Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Kuruzovich J, Massey AP (2008) Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):52–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruton GD, Zahra SA, Van de Ven AH, Hitt MA (2022) Indigenous theory uses, abuses, and future. J. Management Stud. 59(4):1057–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchanan NT, Perez N, Prinstein MJ, Thurston IB (2021) Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. Amer. Psych. 76(7):1097–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A (2014) What have we learned from the smart machine? Inform. Organ. 24(2):71–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan J, Ghose A (2014) Internet’s dirty secret: Assessing the impact of online intermediaries on HIV transmission. MIS Quart. 38(4):955–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Zapata-Phelan CP (2007) Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1281–1303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D, Correia J, Thatcher J (2022) When constructs become obsolete: A systematic approach to evaluating and updating constructs for information systems research. MIS Quart. 46(2):679–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison RM (2021) Special issue: Indigenous theory. Inform. Systems J. 31(6):767–768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison RM, Díaz Andrade A (2018) Promoting indigenous theory. Inform. Systems J. 28(5):759–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison RM, Martinsons MG (2016) Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. J. Inform. Tech. 31(3):241–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis AR (2019) An unhealthy obsession with theory. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(9):1406–1411.Google Scholar
  • Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32(3):575–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G, Gallupe RB (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Sci. 33(5):547–686.Google Scholar
  • Edwards JR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. Drasgow F, Schmitt NW, eds. Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, NJ), 350–400.Google Scholar
  • Feynmann RP (1999) Cargo cult science: Some remarks on science, pseudoscience, and learning how to not fool yourself. Feynmann RP, ed. The Pleasure of Finding Things out: The Best Short Works of Richard P. Feynman (Perseus Books Group, New York), 205–216.Google Scholar
  • Gopal A, Chen P, Oh W, Xu SX, Sarker S (2024) On crafting effective theoretical contributions for empirical papers in economics of information systems: Some editorial reflections. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):917–935.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald AG, Pratkanis AR, Leippe MR, Baumgardner MH (1986) Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psych. Rev. 93(2):216–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grover V, Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. MIS Quart. 39(2):271–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grover V, Lindberg A, Benbasat I, Lyytinen K (2020) The perils and promises of big data research in information systems. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(2):268–291.Google Scholar
  • Gupta A (2018) Traits of successful research contributions for publication in ISR: Some thoughts for authors and reviewers. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):779–786.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2–3):61–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschheim R (2019) Against theory: With apologies to Feyerabend. J. Assoc. Informs. Systems 20(9):1338–1355.Google Scholar
  • Hong W, Chan FKY, Thong JYL, Chasalow LC, Dhillon G (2014) A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):111–136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang D, Jiang L, London J, Jr Grover V, Sun H (2022) Everything old can be new again: Reinvigorating theory borrowing for the digital age. MIS Quart. 46(4):1833–1850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johns G (2017) Reflections on the 2016 decade award: Incorporating context in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):577–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karahanna E, Xu SX, Xu Y, Zhang N (2018) The needs-affordances-features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42(3):737–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Leidner DE (2016) Review and theory symbiosis: An introspective retrospective. J. Assoc. Informs. Systems 19(6):552–567.Google Scholar
  • Leidner DE (2020) What’s in a contribution? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(1):238–245.Google Scholar
  • Martin J (2002) Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moody GD, Siponen M, Pahnila S (2018) Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance. MIS Quart. 42(1):285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G (1980) Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(4):605–622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G (1997) Images of Organization (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Negoita B, Lapointe L, Rivard S (2018) Collective information systems use: A typological theory. MIS Quart. 42(4):1281–1301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A (2017a) Editor’s comments: Avoiding type III errors: Formulating IS research problems that matter. MIS Quart. 41(2):iii–vii.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A (2017b) Editor’s comments: Seeing the forest for the trees. MIS Quart. 41(4):iii–viv.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM, Fried Y (2001) Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. J. Organ. Behav. 22(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandberg J (2000) Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Acad. Management J. 43(1):9–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S (2016) Building on Davison and Martinsons’ concerns: A call for balance between contextual specificity and generality in IS research. J. Inform. Tech. 31(3):250–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuetz S, Venkatesh V (2020) Research perspectives: The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. J. Assoc. Informs. Systems 21(2):460–482.Google Scholar
  • Sievers B (1986) Beyond the surrogate of motivation. Organ. Stud. 7(4):335–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Straub D (2012) Does MIS have native theories? MIS Quart. 36(2):iii–xii.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urquhart C (2016) Response to Davison and Martinsons: Context is king! Yes and no: It’s still all about theory building. J. Inform. Tech. 31(3):254–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quart. 34(2):281–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Bala H, Sambamurthy V (2016) Implementation of an information and communication technology in a developing country: A multi-method longitudinal study in a bank in India. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):558–579.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Bala H, Sykes TA (2010) Impacts of information and communication technology implementations on employees’ jobs in service organizations in India: A multi-method longitudinal field study. Production Oper. Management 19(5):591–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Sullivan YW (2023) Conducting Mixed-Methods Research: From Classical Social Sciences to the Age of Big Data and Analyticals (Virginia Tech Publishing, Blacksburg).Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman S, Cheung CMK, Lee ZWY, Davis FD, Venkatesh V (2018) The “Darth” side of technology use: An inductively derived typology of cyberdeviance. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1060–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Q, Li B, Singh PV (2018) Copycats vs. original mobile apps: A machine learning copycat-detection method and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):273–291.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R (2003) Editor’s comments: The problem of the problem. MIS Quart. 27(1):iii–ix.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):385–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whetten DA (2009) An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management Organ. Rev. 5(1):29–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yukl G (2006) Leadership in Organizations (Pearson/Prentice-Hall, London).Google Scholar
  • Zhang X (2017) Knowledge management system use and job performance: A multilevel contingency model. MIS Quart. 41(3):811–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Book, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.