Task Characteristics and Incentives in Collaborative Problem Solving: Evidence from Three Field Experiments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0118

References

  • Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1279–1333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blot WJ, Meeter DA (1973) Sequential experimental design procedures. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68(343):586–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 13(1):40–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Mas A, Rothstein J (2008) Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):177–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2007) Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Res. Policy 36(10):1620–1634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daley RC (1978) The role of team and task characteristics in R&D team collaborative problem solving and productivity. Management Sci. 24(15):1579–1588.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiore SM, Wiltshire TJ (2016) Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers Psych. 7:1531.Google Scholar
  • Fisher RA (1952) Sequential experimentation. Biometrics 8(3):183–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2021) Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3):1527–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner HK (2016) Smart Collaboration: How Professionals and Their Firms Succeed by Breaking Down Silos (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C, Wang Y (2022) Express: Conducting research in marketing with quasi-experiments. J. Marketing 86(3):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goncalo JA, Chatman JA, Duguid MM, Kennedy JA (2015) Creativity from constraint? How the political correctness norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graesser AC, Fiore SM, Greiff S, Andrews-Todd J, Foltz PW, Hesse FW (2018) Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 19(2):59–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (1968) Effects of task characteristics on group products. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 4(2):162–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Angrist JD (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. J. Econometric Soc. 467–475.Google Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econometrics 142(2):615–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacob R, Zhu P, Somers MA, Bloom H (2012) A Practical Guide to Regression Discontinuity (MDRC, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kay MB, Proudfoot D, Larrick RP (2018) There’s no team in I: How observers perceive individual creativity in a team setting. J. Appl. Psych. 103(4):432–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(6):822–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Bingham JB, Umphress EE (2007) Fairness from the top: Perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organ. Sci. 18(2):200–216.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lissoni F, Montobbio F, Zirulia L (2020) Misallocation of scientific credit: The role of hierarchy and preferences. An extension of Lissoni et al. (2013). Indust. Corporate Change 29(6):1471–1482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ludwig J, Miller DL (2007) Does Head Start improve children’s life chances? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):159–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Sci. 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Onal Vural M, Dahlander L, George G (2013) Collaborative benefits and coordination costs: Learning and capability development in science. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(2):122–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozier O (2018) The impact of secondary schooling in Kenya: A regression discontinuity analysis. J. Human Resources 53(1):157–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Randel A, Jaussi KS (2003) Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. 46(6):763–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Miron-Spektor E, Argote L (2016) Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1108–1124.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seamans R, Zhu F (2013) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Setia P, Rajagopalan B, Sambamurthy V, Calantone R (2012) How peripheral developers contribute to open-source software development. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):144–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toh PK, Polidoro F (2013) A competition-based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1186–1208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vakili K, Teodoridis F, Bikard M (2021) Detrimental collaborations in creative work: Evidence from economics. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1741–1755.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Xie H, Fisher JF (2011) Multilevel Models: Applications Using SAS (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Sci. 316(5827):1036–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.