Seek and Ye Shall Find: An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Seeking Real-Time Feedback on Employee Performance Evaluations

References

• Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A (2013) Impact of information feedback in continuous combinatorial auctions: An experimental study of economic performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(1):55–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arabmazar A, Schmidt P (1981) Further evidence on the robustness of the Tobit estimator to heteroscedasticity. J. Econometrics 17:253–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ardalan A, Quarstein VA, McAfee RB (1994) Enhancing performance through employee discretion and feedback. Industry Management Data Systems 94(10):15–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D (2003) Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J. Management 29(6):773–799.Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Brett JF (2006) 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group Organ. Management 31(5):578–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Brett JF, Charles AC (2007) Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice. Human Resources Management 46(2):285–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auh S, Menguc B, Imer P (2019) Frontline employee feedback-seeking behavior: How is it formed and when does it matter? J. Service Res. 22(1):44–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azevedo R, Cromley JG (2004) Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? J. Edu. Psych. 96(3):523–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bannister BD (1986) Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):203–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Bastos MW, Fletcher C (1995) Exploring the individual’s perception of sources and credibility of feedback in the work environment. Internat. J. Assessment 3(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker TE, Klimoski RJ (1989) A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance. Personality Psych. 42(2):343–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beenen G, Pichler S, Levy PE (2017) Self‐determined feedback-seeking: The role of perceived supervisor autonomy support. Human Resources Management 56(4):555–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belschak FD, Den Hartog DN (2009) Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Appl. Psych. 58(2):274–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjork RA, Dunlosky J, Kornell N (2013) Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annu. Rev. Psych. 64(1):417–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodell L (2019) It’s time to put performance reviews on notice. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisabodell/2018/04/27/why-performance-reviews-are-irrelevant-today.Google Scholar
• Bol L, Campbell KD, Perez T, Yen CJ (2016) The effects of self-regulated learning training on community college students’ metacognition and achievement in developmental math courses. Community College J. Res. Practice 40(6):480–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollmann G, Rouzinov S, Berchtold A, Rossier J (2019) Illustrating instrumental variable regressions using the career adaptability–job satisfaction relationship. Frontiers Psych. 10(1481):1–16.Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (2007) Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Soc. Networks 29:555–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borg I, Zuell C (2012) Write‐in comments in employee surveys. Internat. J. Manpower 33(2):206–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown GK, Mergoupis T (2010) Treatment interactions with non-experimental data in Stata. Stata J. 11(4):545–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckingham M, Goodall A (2019) The feedback fallacy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 97(2):92–101.Google Scholar
• Burnett JR, Lisk TC (2019) The future of employee engagement: Real-time monitoring and digital tools for engaging a workforce. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 49(1):108–119.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Tavis A (2016) The performance management revolution. Accessed March 13, 2023, https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution.Google Scholar
• Carli LL (1990) Gender, language, and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):941–951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Sun Y (2007) The Tobit model with a non-zero threshold. Econom. J. 10(3):488–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan KW, Li SY, Ni J, Zhu JJ (2021) What feedback matters? The role of experience in motivating crowdsourcing innovation. Production Oper. Management 30(1):103–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chappelow C, McCauley C (2019) What good feedback really looks like. Accessed March 13, 2023, https://hbr.org/2019/05/what-good-feedback-really-looks-like.Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Lam W, Zhong JA (2007) Leader-member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):202–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen A, McLean S (2006) On being a supervisor: The importance of feedback and how to give it. Australasia Psychiatry 14(1):67–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbetta G, Salvato C (2017) Self–serving or self–actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.” Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 28(4):355–362.Google Scholar
• De Stobbeleir KEM, Ashford SJ, Buyens D (2011) Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Acad. Management J. 54(4):811–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER (2016) Can your employees really speak freely? Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(1):80–87.Google Scholar
• Diamantidis AD, Chatzoglou P (2018) Factors affecting employee performance: An empirical approach. Internat. J. Production Performance Management 68(1):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar NE, Jensen ML, Miller CH, Bessarabova E, Straub SK, Wilson SN, Scheutzler R, et al. (2014) Mitigating cognitive bias through the use of serious games: Effects of feedback. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Persuasive Technology (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 92–105.Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Sci. 60(11):2835–2857.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Weisner A (2019) What are best practices to measure employee performance to support hiring promotion with no ratings? Retrieved July 24, 2023, https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/student/230.Google Scholar
• Fedor DB, Eder RW, Buckley MR (1989) The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(3):396–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox J, Cruz C, Lee JY (2015) Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Comput. Human Behav. 52:436–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner JW (2020) Managing production yields and rework through feedback on speed, quality, and quantity. Production Oper. Management 29(9):2182–2209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2005) Vicious and virtuous circles in the management of knowledge: The case of Infosys Technologies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):9–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geddes D, Baron RA (1997) Workplace aggression as a consequence of negative performance feedback. Management Comm. Quart. 10(4):433–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghorpade J (2000) Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. Acad. Management Perspective 14(1):140–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Sci. 60(7):1632–1654.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Sundararajan A (2009) The dimensions of reputation in electronic markets. Preprint, submitted March 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.885568.Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Shan C, Yu H (2019) The relationship between the feedback environment and creativity: A self-motives perspective. Psych. Res. Behav. Management 12:825–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves LM, Sarkis J, Zhu Q (2013) How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. J. Environment. Psych. 35:81–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girdauskiene L, Ciplyte EA, Navickas V (2022) Gamification as an innovative instrument for employee engagement. Marketing Management Innovations 1:10–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Liao J, Liao S, Zhang Y (2014) The mediating role of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between developmental feedback and employee job performance. Soc. Behav. Personality 42(5):731–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Lawler EE (1971) Employee reactions to job characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 55(3):259–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hafner CM, Preminger A (2015) A note on the Tobit model in the presence of a duration variable. Econom. Lett. 126:47–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halperin K, Snyder CR, Shenkel RJ, Houston BK (1976) Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 61(1):85–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen AM, Kraemmergaard P, Mathiassen L (2011) Rapid adaptation in digital transformation: A participatory process for engaging IS and business leaders. MIS Quart. Executive 10(4):175–185.Google Scholar
• Harris G (2021) The evolution of employee feedback, engagement, and performance. Accessed March 13, 2023, https://www.quantumworkplace.com/future-of-work/employee-feedback-and-engagement.Google Scholar
• Harter J, Adkins A (2015) Employees want a lot more from their managers. Accessed March 13, 2023, http://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/182321/employees-lot-managers.aspx.Google Scholar
• Hazucha JF, Hezlett SA, Schneider RJ (1993) The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management 32(2–3):325–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez M (2012) Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):172–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann C, Thommes K (2020) Can digital feedback increase employee performance and energy efficiency in firms? Evidence from a field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 180:49–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Huang N, Burtch G, Li C (2016) Culture, conformity, and emotional suppression in online reviews. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(11):737–758.Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Davis C (2000) Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Appl. Psych. 49(3):550–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS (1979) Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 64(4):349–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Mitchell TR, Fredrickson JW (1981) Poor performers: Supervisors’ and subordinates’ responses. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 27(3):386–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilies R, De Pater IE, Judge T (2007) Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. J. Management Psych. 22(6):590–609.Google Scholar
• Itzchakov G, Latham GP (2020) The moderating effect of performance feedback and the mediating effect of self‐set goals on the primed goal‐performance relationship. Appl. Psych. 69(2):379–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jawahar IM (2006) Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback. J. Labor Res. 27(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang C, John K, Larsen D (2021) RandD investment intensity and jump volatility of stock price. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 57:235–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang M, Wang H, Li M (2019) Linking empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior toward environment: The role of psychological ownership and future time perspective. Frontiers Psych. 10:1–13.Google Scholar
• Jung JH, Schneider C, Valacich J (2010) Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Sci. 56(4):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Katou AA (2012) Investigating reverse causality between human resource management policies and organizational performance in small firms. Management Res. Rev. 35(2):134–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinicki AJ, Prussia GE, Wu BJ, McKee-Ryan FM (2004) A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1057–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostons D, Van Gog T, Paas F (2012) Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learn. Instruction 22(2):121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krasman J (2011) Taking feedback-seeking to the next “level”: Organizational structure and feedback-seeking behavior. J. Management Issue 23(1):9–30.Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy S, Ou S, Tripathi AK (2014) Acceptance of monetary rewards in open source software development. Res. Policy 43(4):632–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Qiu L (2021) Social Media Analytics and Practical Applications: The Change to the Competition Landscape (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (1989) The dynamic interplay between employees’ feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors’ delivery of performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):408–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerch FJ, Harter DE (2001) Cognitive support for real-time dynamic decision making. Inform. Systems Res. 12(1):63–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Letmathe P, Schweitzer M, Zielinski M (2012) How to learn new tasks: Shop floor performance effects of knowledge transfer and performance feedback. J. Oper. Management 30(3):221–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Mitchell TR (2017) Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):291–308.Google Scholar
• London M (1997) Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• London M, Smither JW (2002) Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Rev. 12(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machin TM, Jeffries CH (2017) Threat and opportunity: The impact of social inclusion and likeability on anonymous feedback, self-esteem, and belonging. Personality Individual Differences 115:1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Ferrell OC, Hult GTM (1999) Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 27(4):455–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning A (2016) Unlocking the power of employee happiness: What top employees seek from the workplace today. Strategic HR Rev. 15(4):191–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Magni M (2015) Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meneghello K (2020) Taking the fear out of giving feedback. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2020/03/23/taking-the-fear-out-of-giving-feedback.Google Scholar
• Mitchell VL (2006) Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(4):919–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittal M, Asghar R, Tripathi A (2020) Do my emotions influence what I share? Analysing the effects of emotions on privacy leakage in Twitter. Preprint, submitted October 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3745328.Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M, Galaskiewicz J (1993) Networks of interorganizational relations. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1):46–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Nevo D, Pinsonneault A (2021) Personal achievement goals, learning strategies, and perceived IT affordances. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1298–1322.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Donovan BM, den Outer B, Price M, Lloyd A (2021) What makes good feedback good? Stud. Higher Edu. 46(2):318–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Officevibe (2022) Statistics on the importance of employee feedback. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://officevibe.com/blog/infographic-employee-feedback.Google Scholar
• Panadero E (2017) A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers Psych. 8(422):1–28.Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Collins CG (2010) Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. J. Management 36(3):633–662.Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Porter LW (1986) Employee responses to formal appraisal feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):211–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrucci T, Rivera M, Tironi C (2016) DevelapMe, version 2.1. http://www.DevelapMe.com.Google Scholar
• Petryk M, Rivera M, Bhattacharya S, Qiu L, Kumar S (2022) How network embeddedness affects real-time performance feedback: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1467–1489.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):298–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Rev. General Psych. 7(1):84–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Pittano D, Martínez AB, Chirico F, Galván RS (2018) Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity. J. Bus. Res. 84:312–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirkkalainen H, Pawlowski JM, Bick M, Tannhäuser AC (2018) Engaging in knowledge exchange: The instrumental psychological ownership in open innovation communities. Internat. J. Inform. Management 38(1):277–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Farh JL (1986) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance: A preliminary test of some control theory propositions. Acad. Management Proc. 1986(1):198–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Farh JL (1989) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C (2016) Give your team more-effective positive feedback. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://hbr.org/2016/10/give-your-team-more-effective-positive-feedback.Google Scholar
• Porter J (2019) How leaders can get honest, productive feedback. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://hbr.org/2019/01/how-leaders-can-get-honest-productive-feedback.Google Scholar
• Priyankara H, Luo F, Saeed A, Nubuor S, Jayasuriya M (2018) How does leader’s support for environment promote organizational citizenship behavior for environment? A multi-theory perspective. Sustainability 10(271):1–20.Google Scholar
• Puhani P (2000) The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. J. Econom. Survey 14(1):53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purely HR (2021) Why employee feedback leads to happier employees (and how to give it). Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.purelyhr.com/blog/employee-feedback/.Google Scholar
• Qian J, Yang F, Han ZR, Wang H, Wang J (2018) The presence of a feedback-seeking role model in promoting employee feedback-seeking: A moderated mediation model. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 29(18):2682–2700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers SF, Baars M, Paas F (2019) Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy. Metacognition Learn. 14(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera M, Guo X, Shan G, Qiu L (2021a) Stimulating feedback contributions using digital nudges: A field experiment on the real-time mobile feedback platform. Preprint, submitted September 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933068.Google Scholar
• Rivera M, Jiang C, Shoham A, Kumar S (2021b) What’s gender got to do with it? An empirical examination of gender-based workplace feedback and performance. Preprint, submitted January 9, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3763180.Google Scholar
• Rivera M, Qiu L, Kumar S, Petrucci T (2021c) Are traditional performance reviews outdated?: An empirical analysis on continuous real-time mobile feedback in the workplace. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):517–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Stultz RM, Harris M, Constantinides GM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roebuck C (1996) Constructive feedback: Key to higher performance and commitment. Long Range Planning 29(3):328–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolim C, Baptista P, Duarte G, Farias T, Shiftan Y (2014) Quantification of the impacts of eco-driving training and real-time feedback on urban buses driver’s behaviour. Transportation Res. Proc. 3:70–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sagrestano LM (1992) Power strategies in interpersonal relationships the effects of expertise and gender. Psych. Women Quart. 16(4):481–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos C (2017) Real time performance feedback? They have an app for that. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2017/02/09/real-time-performance-feedback-app/.Google Scholar
• Schrage M, Kiron D, Hancock B, Breschi R (2019) Performance management’s digital shift. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/performance-managements-digital-shift.Google Scholar
• Setia P, Venkatesh V, Joglekar S (2013) Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):565–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shan G, Bauman K, Rivera M, Kumar S (2022) Mobile or desktop, that is the question: An empirical study of investigating the role of device on real-time employee feedback quality. Preprint, submitted April 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077192.Google Scholar
• Shaoolian G (2018) This is the right way to ask your boss for feedback. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.fastcompany.com/40534663/this-is-the-right-way-to-ask-your-boss-for-feedback.Google Scholar
• Sherf E, Morrison E (2019) I do not need feedback! Or do I? Self-efficacy, perspective taking, and feedback-seeking. J. Appl. Psych. 105(2):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smart JR, Kranz K, Carmona F, Lindner TW, Newton A (2015) Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training: A prospective observational study from several European EMS. Scandinavian J. Trauma Resuscitation Emergency Medicine 23(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (2022) More employers ditch performance appraisals. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:N30kTW6kwVwJ:https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/more-employers-ditch-performance-appraisals.aspx.Google Scholar
• Smith AM, O’Sullivan T (2012) Environmentally responsible behavior in the workplace: An internal social marketing approach. J. Marketing Management 28(3–4):469–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smither JW, London M, Vasilopoulos NL, Reilly RR, Millsap RE, Salvemini N (1995) An examination of the effects of an upward feedback program over time. Personality Psych. 48(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman LA, Rutkowski KA (2004) Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. J. Management Psych. 19(1):6–18.Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone D, Heen S (2015) Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well (Even When It Is Off Base, Unfair Poorly Delivered, and Frankly, You’re Not in the Mood), vol. 36 (Penguin).Google Scholar
• Sung SY, Rhee YW, Lee JE, Choi JN, Yoon HJ (2019) Multilevel social predictors of employee feedback-seeking behavior: A cost–benefit perspective. Soc. Behav. Personality 47(2):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas JW, Ward K (2006) Economic profiling of physician specialists: Use of outlier treatment and episode attribution rules. Inquiry 43:271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Goette L, Degen K, Tasic V, Fleisch E, Lalive R, Staake T (2018) Overcoming salience bias: How real-time feedback fosters resource conservation. Management Sci. 64(3):1458–1476.Link, Google Scholar
• Tuckey M, Brewer N, Williamson P (2002) The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback-seeking. J. Occupation Organ. Psych. 75(2):195–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Ganesan S, Challagalla GN, Brown SP (2000) An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):996–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldersee R, Luthans F (1994) The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance. J. Organ. Behav. 15(1):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman DA, Atwater LE, Antonioni D (1998) Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Acad. Management Perspective 12(2):86–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wisniewski B, Zierer K, Hattie J (2020) The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers Psych. 10(3087):1–14.Google Scholar
• Yohn D (2019) Employee feedback is good for employee engagement; Action is better. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniselyohn/2019/08/06/employee-feedback-is-good-for-employee-engagement-action-is-better.Google Scholar
• Zenger J, Folkman J (2014) Your employees want the negative feedback you hate to give. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://hbr.org/2014/01/your-employees-want-the-negative-feedback-you-hate-to-give.Google Scholar
• Zhang H (2017) How do I recognize thee, let me count the ways. Retrieved March 13, 2023, https://docplayer.net/123765959-How-do-i-recognize-thee-let-me-count-the-ways.html.Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academic Management 53(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rivera M, Qiu L, Kumar S (2021) The impact of organizational structure and employee traits on peer-based internal evaluation systems: An empirical investigation. Preprint, submitted November 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3965694.Google Scholar