Chat More and Contribute Better: An Empirical Study of a Knowledge-Sharing Community

References

• Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2012) Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: A case study of stack overflow. Agarwal D, Pei J, program chairs. KDD ’12: Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD 2012 Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Beijing, China), 850–858.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atwood J (2010) Do trilogy sites need a “third place”? Accessed December 29, 2020, https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/04/29/do-trilogy-sites-need-a-third-place/.Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back KW (1951) Influence through social communication. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 46(1):9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck R, Pahlke I, Seebach C (2014) Knowledge exchange and symbolic action in social media-enabled electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 38(4):1245–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E, Reis HT (1998) Attraction and close relationships. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 193–281. Google Scholar
• Browne R (2018) Reach 300+ million monthly unique visitors on Quora. Accessed December 29, 2020, https://www.quora.com/q/quoraforbusiness/Reach-300-million-monthly-unique-visitors-on-Quora/.Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989) The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc. Networks 11(3):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2022) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. 68(5):3488–3506.Link, Google Scholar
• Calefato F, Lanubile F, Marasciulo MC, Novielli N (2015). Mining successful answers in Stack Overflow. 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 430–433.Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32(3):575–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Kudaravalli S, Wasko M (2015) Leading collaboration in online communities. MIS Quart. 39(2):393–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Special section introduction: Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Farzan R, Dabbish L, Kraut R, Postmes T (2011) Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence. Bardram J, Ducheneaut N, program chairs. CSCW '11: Proc. ACM 2011 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China), 321–330.Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schacter S, Back K (1950) Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Ford D, Lustig K, Banks J, Parnin C (2018). “We don’t do that here”: How collaborative editing with mentors improves engagement in social Q&A communities. Proc. 2018 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, 1–12.Google Scholar
• Forgas JP (1995) Strange couples: Mood effects on judgments and memory about prototypical and atypical relationships. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(7):747–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton D (2019) State of the Stack 2019: A year in review. Accessed December 29, 2020, https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/01/18/state-of-the-stack-2019-a-year-in-review/.Google Scholar
• Gallus J (2017) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.Link, Google Scholar
• George JF, Carlson JR, Valacich JS (2013) Media selection as a strategic component of communication. MIS Quart. 37(4):1233–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunaratne C, Baral N, Rand W, Garibay I, Jayalath C, Senevirathna C (2020) The effects of information overload on online conversation dynamics. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 26:255–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Turner JC (1985) Interpersonal attraction, social identification, and psychological group formation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2022) IT knowledge spillovers, absorptive capacity, and productivity: Evidence from enterprise software. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):908–934.Link, Google Scholar
• Isen AM, Levin PF (1972) Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 21(3):384–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivanov A, Tacheva Z, Shaw M (2020) Role of social identity in shaping online review behavior: Evidence from natural experiment. Preprint, submitted September 16, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3665669.Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim C, Wang H-C (2022) From receivers to givers: Understanding practice of reciprocity in an online support community. Nichols J, ed. Proc. ACM Human–Comput. Interaction, vol. 6(91) (ACM, New York), 1–17.Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Jarvenpaa SL, Gu B (2018) External bridging and internal bonding: Unlocking the generative resources of member time and attention spent in online communities. MIS Quart. 42(1):265–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Resnick P (2012) Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Kraut RE, Zhu H (2021) Technical features of asynchronous and synchronous community platforms and their effects on community cohesion: A comparative study of forum-based and chat-based online mental health communities. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 26(6):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao GY, Huang TL, Dennis AR, Teng CI (2024) The influence of media capabilities on knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):165–183.Link, Google Scholar
• McKenna KY, Green AS, Gleason ME (2002) Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? J. Soc. Issues 58(1):9–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Stanley D, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L (2002) Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocational Behav. 61(1):20–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S (1977) The familiar strateger: An aspect of urban anonymity. Milgram S, ed. The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA), 51–53.Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A (2021) Information seeding and knowledge production in online communities: Evidence from OpenStreetMap. Management Sci. 67(8):4908–4934.Link, Google Scholar
• Newcomb TM (1961) The acquaintance process as a prototype of human interaction.Google Scholar
• Oldenburg R (1989) The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day.Google Scholar
• Oliveira N, Muller M, Andrade N, Reinecke K (2018) The exchange in StackExchange: Divergences between Stack Overflow and its culturally diverse participants. Karahalios K, Monroy-Hernández A, Lampinen A, Fitzpatrick G, eds. Proc. ACM Human–Comput. Interactions, vol. 2(130) (ACM, New York), 1–22.Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R, Lee A, Novak RJ (2005) Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(5):747–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT, Lightdale JR (1994) Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(5):484–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rambachan A, Roth J (2023) A more credible approach to parallel trends. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2555–2591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Kraut R, Kiesler S (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):377–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Harper FM, Drenner S, Terveen L, Kiesler S, Riedl J, Kraut RE (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quart. 36(3):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riketta M, Dick R (2005) Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength of correlates of workgroup versus organization identification and commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 67(3):490–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenberg K (2002) Common bond and common identity groups on the internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynam. Theory Res. Practice 6(1):27–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuetzler RM, Grimes GM, Scott Giboney J (2020) The impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(3):875–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Brooks JAM (2019) An interactional view of social presence: Making the virtual other “real”. Inform. Systems J. 29(3):707–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler CA, Williams D (2006) Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places.” J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 11(4):885–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinmacher I, Conte T, Gerosa MA, Redmiles D (2015) Social barriers faced by newcomers placing their first contribution in open source software projects. Ciolfi L, McDonald D, program chairs. CSCW 2015: Proc. 18th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (Vancouver, BC, Canada), 1379–1392.Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Akiyama E (2007) Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity. J. Theoret. Biol. 245(3):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik Y, Dabbish L, Kraut R (2014) Building loyalty to online communities through bond and identity-based attachment to sub-groups. Morris MR, Reddy R, eds. CSCW 2014: Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Social Comput. (Baltimore, MD), 146–157.Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe C, Bentein K, Stinglhamber F (2004) Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 64(1):47–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wikipedia (2018) Zhihu. Accessed December 29, 2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhihu#cite_note-5/.Google Scholar
• Yang D, Kraut R, Levine J (2017) Commitment of newcomers and old-timers to online health support communities. Lampe C, Schraefel MC, Hourcade JP, Appert C, Wigdor D, program chairs. CHI 2017: Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Denver, CO), 6363–6375.Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar