Rethinking Gamification Failure: A Model and Investigation of Gamified System Maladaptive Behaviors

References

• Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Gitomer J (1984) Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 10(2):209–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong DJ, Hardgrave BC (2007) Understanding mindshift learning: The transition to object-oriented development. MIS Quart. 31(3):453–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asadzandi S, Sedghi S, Bigdeli S, Sanjari M (2020) A systematized review on diabetes gamification. Medical J. Islamic Republic Iran 34(1):1163–1177.Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Wood R (1989) Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(5):805–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C (2007) Information system use–related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):173–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Bastian B, Jetten J, Thai HA, Steffens NK (2018) Shared adversity increases team creativity through fostering supportive interaction. Front. Psych. 9:2309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker J-M, Cheah J-H, Gholamzade R, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2023) PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. Internat. J. Contemporary Hospitality Management 35(1):321–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman S, Murray KB (2018) Feedback, task performance, and interface preferences. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(6):654–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett N, Naumann SE (2005) Withholding effort at work: Understanding and preventing shirking, job neglect, social loafing, and free riding. Kidwell R, Martin C, eds. Managing Organizational Deviance (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 113–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, Witte H, Soenens B, Lens W (2010) Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 83(4):981–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bui A, Veit D, Webster J (2015) Gamification – A novel phenomenon or a new wrapping for existing concepts? Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2015) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 3446–3466.Google Scholar
• Callan RC, Bauer KN, Landers RN (2015) How to avoid the dark side of gamification: Ten business scenarios and their unintended consequences. Reiners T, Wood LC, eds. Gamification in Education and Business (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 553–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1980) The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 13 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 39–80.Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer, Boston), 11–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psych. Inquiry 11(4):227–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L (2011) From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proc. 15th Internat. Acad. MindTrek Conf. Envisioning Future Media Environ. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 9–15.Google Scholar
• Duh HB-L, Chen VHH (2009) Cheating behaviors in online gaming. Ozok AA, Zaphiris P, eds. Online Communities and Social Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5621 (Springer, Berlin), 567–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley PC, Northcraft GB, Lee C, Lituchy TR (1990) Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Acad. Management J. 33(1):87–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Boston).Google Scholar
• Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D (2001) Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J. Vocat. Behav. 59(3):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghadi MY (2018) Empirical examination of theoretical model of workplace envy: Evidences from Jordan. Management Res. Rev. 41(12):1438–1459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Guo C, Lin M (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):497–516.Link, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Amer. Psych. 54(7):493–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Paolacci G (2017) Crowdsourcing consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 44(1):196–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1986) Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. J. Appl. Psych. 71(2):340–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groh F (2012) Gamification: State of the art definition and utilization. Asaj N, Könings B, Poguntke M, Schaub F, Wiedersheim B, Weber M, eds. Proc. 4th Seminar Res. Trends Media Informatics (Institute of Media Informatics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany), 39–46.Google Scholar
• Hanus MD, Fox J (2015) Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Ed. 80:152–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie R (1984) Causes and effects of causal attribution. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(1):44–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Liu S, Wang L (2022) Fun shopping: A randomized field experiment on gamification. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):766–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffman L, Rovine MJ (2007) Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behav. Res. Methods 39(1):101–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtom BC, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Eberly MB (2008) Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):231–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunicke R, LeBlanc M, Zubek R (2004) MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proc. AAAI Workshop Challenges Game AI (AAAI, Washington, DC), 1–5.Google Scholar
• James TL, Deane JK, Wallace L (2019) An application of goal content theory to examine how desired exercise outcomes impact fitness technology feature set selection. Inform. Systems J. 29(5):1010–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 30(2):199–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2007) The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers’ product understanding. MIS Quart. 31(3):475–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung JH, Schneider C, Valacich J (2010) Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Sci. 56(4):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Kapp KM, Blair L, Mesch R (2014) The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Karjalainen M, Sarker S, Siponen M (2019) Toward a theory of information systems security behaviors of organizational employees: A dialectical process perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):687–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Koestner R, Hope N (2014) A self-determination theory approach to goals. Gagné M, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 400–413.Google Scholar
• Koster R (2005) A Theory of Fun for Game Design (Paraglyph Press, Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
• Krasnova H, Widjaja T, Buxmann P, Wenninger H, Benbasat I (2015) Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Chernikova M, Babush M, Dugas M, Schumpe BM (2015) The architecture of goal systems: Multifinality, equifinality, and counterfinality in means-end relations. Elliot AJ, ed. Advances in Motivation Science, vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 69–98.Google Scholar
• Kumar J, Herger M (2013) Gamification at Work: Designing Engaging Business Software, 1st ed. (Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landers RN, Bauer KN, Callan RC (2017) Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Comput. Human Behav. 71:508–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landers RN, Auer EM, Collmus AB, Armstrong MB (2018) Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simul. Gaming 49(3):315–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):212–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Locke EA (2007) New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. Eur. Psych. 12(4):290–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP, Winters DC, Locke EA (1994) Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. J. Organ. Behav. 15(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Robinson SL (2007) Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. J. Management 33(3):378–394.Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Leclercq T, Poncin I, Hammedi W, Kullak A, Hollebeek LD (2020) When gamification backfires: The impact of perceived justice on online community contributions. J. Marketing Management 36(5–6):550–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepper MR, Greene D, Nisbett RE (1973) Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 28(1):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung ACM, Santhanam R, Kwok RC-W, Yue WT (2023) Could gamification designs enhance online learning through personalization? Lessons from a field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):27–49.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Santhanam R, Webster J (2017) Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quart. 41(4):1011–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA (1968) Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Perform. 3(2):157–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA (1978) The ubiquity of the technique of goal setting in theories of and approaches to employee motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):594–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowry P, Gaskin J, Twyman N, Hammer B, Roberts T (2013) Taking “fun and games” seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(11):617–671.Google Scholar
• Luo X, Li H, Hu Q, Xu H (2020) Why individual employees commit malicious computer abuse: A routine activity theory perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(6):1552–1593.Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Jarvis CB (2005) The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):710–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marczewski A (2015) Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play: Gamification, Game Thinking & Motivational Design (Gamified UK, Addlestone, UK).Google Scholar
• Mekler ED, Brühlmann F, Tuch AN, Opwis K (2017) Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Comput. Human Behav. 71:525–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mogavi RH, Guo B, Zhang Y, Haq E-U, Hui P, Ma X (2022) When gamification spoils your learning: A qualitative case study of gamification misuse in a language-learning app. Proc. Ninth ACM Conf. Learn. Scale (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 175–188.Google Scholar
• Morford ZH, Witts BN, Killingsworth KJ, Alavosius MP (2014) Gamification: The intersection between behavior analysis and game design technologies. Behav. Anal. 37(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nacke LE, Deterding S (2017) The maturing of gamification research. Comput. Human Behav. 71:450–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Gupta R (2007) A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quart. 31(3):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliveira W, Hamari J, Shi L, Toda AM, Rodrigues L, Palomino PT, Isotani S (2023) Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda. Ed. Inform. Tech. 28(1):373–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paas F, Tuovinen JE, Tabbers H, Van Gerven PWM (2003) Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Ed. Psych. 38(1):63–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS, Wells JD (2009) The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):60–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavey L, Greitemeyer T, Sparks P (2011) Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(7):905–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng W, Lin J-H, Pfeiffer KA, Winn B (2012) Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psych. 15(2):175–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlman D (2010) Change in affect and needs satisfaction for amotivated students within the sport education model. J. Teach. Phys. Ed. 29(4):433–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlman D (2012) An examination of amotivated students within the sport education model. Asia-Pac. J. Health Sport Phys. Ed. 3(2):141–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Deci EL (1996) Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(1):24–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub D (2012) Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in “MIS Quarterly.” MIS Quart. 36(1):iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psych. 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Rigby CS, Przybylski A (2006) The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4):344–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sailer M, Hense JU, Mayr SK, Mandl H (2017) How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput. Human Behav. 69:371–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Liu D, Shen W-CM (2016) Research note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):453–465.Link, Google Scholar
• Schöbel S, Janson A, Ernst S-J, Leimeister JM (2017) How to gamify a mobile learning application – A modularization approach. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2017) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Schöbel S, Janson A, Jahn K, Kordyaka B, Turetken O, Djafarova N, Saqr M, et al. (2019) A research agenda for the why, what, and how of gamification designs: Outcomes of an ECIS 2019 panel. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 46(1):706–721.Google Scholar
• Seaborn K, Fels DI (2015) Gamification in theory and action: A survey. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 74:14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sepehr S, Head M (2018) Understanding the role of competition in video gameplay satisfaction. Inform. Management 55(4):407–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Appu AV (2015) Work autonomy and workplace creativity: Moderating role of task complexity. Global Bus. Rev. 16(5):772–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silic M, Lowry PB (2020) Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(1):129–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spinella M (2007) Normative data and a short form of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Internat. J. Neurosci. 117(3):359–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub DW (1989) Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. 13(2):147–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suh A, Cheung CMK, Ahuja M, Wagner C (2017) Gamification in the workplace: The central role of the aesthetic experience. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(1):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H (2012) Understanding user revisions when using information system features: Adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Quart. 36(2):453–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tai K, Narayanan J, McAllister DJ (2012) Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):107–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, ed. (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Jost JT, Sidanius J, eds. Political Psychology: Key Readings, 1st ed. (Psychology Press, London), 276–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, Gruenewald TL, Gurung RAR, Updegraff JA (2000) Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psych. Rev. 107(3):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tondello G, Premsukh H, Nacke L (2018) A theory of gamification principles through goal-setting theory. Proc. 51st Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu).Google Scholar
• Vaghefi I, Negoita B, Lapointe L (2023) The path to hedonic information system use addiction: A process model in the context of social networking sites. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):85–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Roy R, Zaman B (2019) Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. Internat. J. Human. Comput. Stud. 127:38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW (2001) The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):629–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown S, Sullivan Y (2016) Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(7):435–494.Google Scholar
• Wallace JC, Little LM, Shull A (2008) The moderating effects of task complexity on the relationship between regulatory foci and safety and production performance. J. Occup. Health Psych. 13(2):95–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg RS, Jackson A (1979) Competition and extrinsic rewards: Effect on intrinsic motivation and attribution. Res. Quart. 50(3):494–502.Google Scholar
• Whitehouse H, Jong J, Buhrmester MD, Gómez Á, Bastian B, Kavanagh CM, Newson M, et al. (2017) The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences. Sci. Rep. 7(1):44292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood RE, Mento AJ, Locke EA (1987) Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 72(3):416–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yan J, Randell B (2009) An investigation of cheating in online games. IEEE Security Privacy Magazine 7(3):37–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang XC, Lee H, Rodriguez C, Rudner J, Chan TM, Papanagnou D (2018) Trapped as a group, escape as a team: Applying gamification to incorporate team-building skills through an ‘escape room’ experience. Cureus 10(3):e2256.Google Scholar