The Impact of Transparency-Inducing Management Information System Use on Employees’ Daily Work Performance

References

• Ahearne M, Jones E, Rapp A, Mathieu J (2008) High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Sci. 54(4):671–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi S, Böhm E, Habel J, Wieseke J, Schmitz C, Brüggemann F (2022) The ambivalent role of monetary sales incentives in service innovation selling. J. Product Innovation Management 39(3):445–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alder GS, Noel TW, Ambrose ML (2006) Clarifying the effects of internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust. Inform. Management 43(7):894–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1984) The effect of sampling error on convergence improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika 49(2):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Au N, Ngai EW, Cheng TE (2008) Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quart. 32(1):43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(1):8–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Bhagwatwar A (2018) Employee dispositions to job and organization as antecedents and consequences of information systems use. Inform. Systems J. 28(4):650–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V (2016) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Ball K (2010) Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor Hist. 51(1):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger P, Belogolovsky E (2017) The dark side of transparency: How and when pay administration practices affect employee helping. J. Appl. Psych. 102(4):658–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C (2007) Information system use-related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):173–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Eggers JP, Stieglitz N (2019) Colleagues and competitors: How internal social comparisons shape organizational search and adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):275–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Weijters B (2022) Structural equation modeling. Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, eds. Handbook of Market Research (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 549–586.Google Scholar
• Bayerl PS, Lauche K, Axtell C (2016) Revisiting group-based technology adoption as a dynamic process: The role of changing attitude-rationale configurations. MIS Quart. 40(3):775–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM (2003) Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 6(4):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(4):1017–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, James TL (2020) A theory of multilevel information privacy management for the digital era. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):510–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Benlian A (2022) Sprint zeal or sprint fatigue? The benefits and burdens of agile ISD practices use for developer well-being. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):557–578.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2017) Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Ann. Management Rev. 11(1):217–266.Google Scholar
• Bonaretti D, Bartosiak M, Lui TW, Piccoli G, Marchesani D (2020) What can I (S) do for you?”: How technology enables service providers to elicit customers’ preferences and deliver personalized service. Inform. Management 57(6):103346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown M, Nyberg AJ, Weller I, Strizver SD (2022) Pay information disclosure: Review and recommendations for research spanning the pay secrecy: Pay transparency continuum. J. Management 48(6):1661–1694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehrer RE, Senecal S, Bolman Pullins E (2005) Sales force technology usage—Reasons barriers and support: An exploratory investigation. Indust. Marketing Management 34(4):389–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay CJ (2017) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Burleson J, Grover V, Thatcher JB, Sun H (2021) A representation theory perspective on the repurposing of personal technologies for work-related tasks. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1556–1589.Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):632–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Straub DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):228–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Volkoff O (2017) How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):468–489.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Bremhorst M, Liu F, Trieu VH (2017) IT use: Notes from a journey from use to effective use. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge, New York), 152–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V, Bush AJ, Orr L (2010) Monitoring the ethical use of sales technology: An exploratory field investigation. J. Bus. Ethics 95(2):239–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio WF, Montealegre R (2016) How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):349–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Hsieh J-A, Rai A, Sean Xin X (2021) How does employee infusion use of CRM systems drive customer satisfaction? Mechanism differences between face-to-face and virtual channels. MIS Quart. 45(2):719–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen RR, Ou CX, Wang W, Peng Z, Davison RM (2020) Moving beyond the direct impact of using CRM systems on frontline employees’ service performance: The mediating role of adaptive behaviour. Inform. Systems J. 30(3):458–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicala JE, Bush AJ, Sherrell DL, Deitz GD (2014) Does transparency influence the ethical behavior of salespeople? J. Bus. Res. 67(9):1787–1795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claggett JL, Karahanna E (2018) Unpacking the structure of coordination mechanisms and the role of relational coordination in an era of digitally mediated work processes. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):704–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colbert A, Yee N, George G (2016) The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Acad. Management J. 59(3):731–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly CE, Zweig D, Webster J, Trougakos JP (2012) Knowledge hiding in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 33(1):64–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cram WA, Wiener M, Tarafdar M, Benlian A (2022) Examining the impact of algorithmic control on Uber drivers’ technostress. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(2):426–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Da Cunha JV (2013) A dramaturgical model of the production of performance data. MIS Quart. 37(3):723–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeShon RP, Kozlowski SWJ, Schmidt AM, Milner KR, Wiechmann D (2004) A multiple-goal multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1035–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41:1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friess M, Alavi S, Habel J, Richter B (2024) When sales leaders induce competition among sales employees: A source of motivation or exhaustion? J. Personal Selling Sales Management 44(4):355–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagné P, Hancock GR (2006) Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behav. Res. 41(1):65–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghasemaghaei M, Turel O (2021) Possible negative effects of big data on decision quality in firms: The role of knowledge hiding behaviors. Inform. Systems J. 31(2):268–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs M, Mengel F, Siemroth C (2023) Work from home and productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data on information technology professionals. J. Political Econom. Microeconom. 1(1):7–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg P (2010) CRM at the Speed of Light: Social CRM Strategies, Tools, and Techniques, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Cote JA, Baumgartner H (2004) Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. 23(4):519–529.Link, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Chiang RHL, Liang TP, Zhang D (2018) Creating strategic business value from big data analytics: A research framework. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):388–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habel J, Alavi S, Heinitz N (2024) Effective implementation of predictive sales analytics. J. Marketing Res. 61(4):718–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M (2007) Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Baratta JE (1993) Dynamic criteria and the measurement of change. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2):194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg C, Klarmann M, Reimann M, Schilke O (2012) What drives key informant accuracy? J. Marketing Res. 49(4):594–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JPA, Rai A, Keil M (2011) Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: Forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):233–253.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Djurdjevic E (2011) Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):744–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones E, Sundaram S, Chin W (2002) Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 22(3):145–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Gupta S (2014) A user empowerment approach to information systems infusion. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 61(4):656–668.Google Scholar
• Kinicki AJ, Prussia GE, Wu B, McKee-Ryan FM (2004) A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1057–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostojohn S, Johnson M, Paulen B (2011) CRM Fundamentals (Apress, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krämer M, Desernot C, Alavi S, Schmitz C, Brüggemann F, Wieseke J (2022) The role of salespeople in industrial servitization: How to manage diminishing profit returns from salespeople’s increasing industrial service shares. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 39(4):1235–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuegler M, Smolnik S, Kane G (2015) What’s in it for employees? Understanding the relationship between use and performance in enterprise social software. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(2):90–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam SK, Sleep S, Hennig-Thurau T, Sridhar S, Saboo AR (2017) Leveraging frontline employees’ small data and firm-level big data in frontline management: An absorptive capacity perspective. J. Service Res. 20(1):12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauterbach J, Mueller B, Kahrau F (2020) Achieving effective use when digitalizing work: The role of representational complexity. MIS Quart. 44(3):1023–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li LM, Mao JY (2012) The effect of CRM use on internal sales management control: An alternative mechanism to realize CRM benefits. Inform. Management 49(6):269–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hsieh J-A, Rai A (2013) Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):659–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang G, Wang HJ (2021) Peer effects in competitive environments: Field experiments on information provision and interventions. MIS Quart. 45(1):163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Peng J, Hong Y, Gu B (2023) The hidden costs and benefits of monitoring in the gig economy. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):297–318.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade JR (1999) On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psych. Methods 4(2):192–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Santhanam R, Webster J (2017) Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quart. 41(4):1011–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malik N, Tripathi SN, Kar AK, Gupta S (2022) Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations. Internat. J. Manpower 43(2):334–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manroop L, Malik A, Milner M (2024) The ethical implications of big data in human resource management. Human Resource Management Rev. 34(2):101012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason CH, Perreault WD (1991) Collinearity power and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. J. Marketing Res. 28(3):268–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Gallagher PT, Domingo MA, Klock EA (2019) Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 6:17–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehl MR, Conner TS (2012) Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE (2006) The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1321–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Namvar M, Intezari A, Akhlaghpour S, Brienza JP (2023) Beyond effective use: Integrating wise reasoning in machine learning development. Internat. J. Inform. Management 69:102566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer MG, Johnson CM, Johnson DA (2015) Objective performance feedback: Is numerical accuracy necessary? J. Organ. Behav. Management 35(3–4):206–239.Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Grote G (2022) Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psych. 71(4):1171–1204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP, Williams LJ, Huang C, Yang J (2024) Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 11:17–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posey C, Bennett B, Roberts T, Lowry PB (2011) When computer monitoring backfires: Invasion of privacy and organizational injustice as precursors to computer abuse. J. Inform. System Security 7(1):24–47.Google Scholar
• Rai A, Hornyak R (2013) The impact of sourcing enterprise system use and work process interdependence on sourcing professionals’ job outcomes. J. Oper. Management 31(6):474–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendhran R, Fast NJ (2021) Humans judge algorithms nudge: The psychology of behavior tracking acceptance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 164:11–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravid DM, White JC, Tomczak DL, Miles AF, Behrend TS (2023) A meta-analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes. Personnel Psych. 76(1):5–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Sheldon KM, Gable SL, Roscoe J, Ryan RM (2000) Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(4):419–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A, Malter AJ, Ganesan S, Moorman C (2008) Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. J. Marketing Res. 45(3):261–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Román S, Rodríguez R (2015) The influence of sales force technology use on outcome performance. J. Bus. Indust. Marketing 30(6):771–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sande JB, Ghosh M (2018) Endogeneity in survey research. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 35(2):185–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz KW, Teng JTC, Webb KJ (2016) Capturing the complexity of malleable IT use: Adaptive structuration theory for individuals. MIS Quart. 40(3):663–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell G, Barker JR (2006) Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh T, Johnston AC (2019) How much is too much: Employee monitoring surveillance and strain. Krcmar H, Fedorowicz J, eds. Proc. 40th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA), 31.Google Scholar
• Spiller SA, Fitzsimons GJ, Lynch JG, Mcclelland GH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):277–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steelman ZR, Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S (2019) Performance consequences of information technology investments: Implications of emphasizing new or current information technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):204–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Straub DW, Burton-Jones A (2007) Veni vidi vici: Breaking the TAM logjam. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(4):223–229.Google Scholar
• Sun H (2012) Understanding user revisions when using information system features: Adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Quart. 36(2):453–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Wright RT, Thatcher JB (2019) Revisiting the impact of system use on task performance: An exploitative-explorative system use framework. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(4):398–433.Google Scholar
• Sundaram S, Schwarz A, Jones E, Chin WW (2007) Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):101–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes TA (2020) Enterprise system implementation and employee job outcomes: Understanding the role of formal and informal support structures using the job strain model. MIS Quart. 44(4):2055–2086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tapscott D, Ticoll D (2003) The Naked Corporation: How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Bolman Pullins E, Ragu-Nathan TS (2014) Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 34(1):51–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torres R, Sidorova A (2019) Reconceptualizing information quality as effective use in the context of business intelligence and analytics. Internat. J. Inform. Management 49:316–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trieu VH, Burton-Jones A, Green P (2022) Applying and extending the theory of effective use in a business intelligence context. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(1):645–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Speier-Pero C, Aljafari R, Bala H (2022) IT use and job outcomes: A longitudinal field study of technology contingencies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(5):1184–1210.Google Scholar
• Vomberg A, Klarmann M (2022) Crafting survey research: A systematic process for conducting survey research. Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, eds. Handbook of Market Research (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 67–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Weber R (1990) An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 16(11):1282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R (1997) Ontological Foundations of Information Systems (Coopers & Lybrand and the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, Australia).Google Scholar
• Yost AB, Behrend TS, Howardson G, Badger Darrow J, Jensen JM (2019) Reactance to electronic surveillance: A test of antecedents and outcomes. J. Bus. Psych. 34(1):71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zablah AR, Bellenger DN, Straub DW, Johnston WJ (2012) Performance implications of CRM technology use: A multilevel field study of business customers and their providers in the telecommunications industry. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):418–435.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X (2017) Knowledge management system use and job performance: A multilevel contingency model. MIS Quart. 41(3):811–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ji X (2023) A virtual net locks me in: How and when information and communication technology use intensity leads to knowledge hiding. J. Bus. Ethics 187(3):611–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Fang Y, Wei KK, He W (2013) Cognitive elaboration during wiki use in project teams: An empirical study. Decision Support Systems 55(3):792–801.Crossref, Google Scholar