Translating Agile Development in Different Institutional Contexts: Dynamism, Pluralism, and Ratcheting over Time

References

• Abrahamsson P, Babar MA, Kruchten P (2010) Agility and architecture: Can they coexist? IEEE Software 27(2):16–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Annosi MC, Mattarelli E, Micelotta E, Martini A (2022) Logics’ shift and depletion of innovation: A multi-level study of agile use in a multinational telco company. Inform. Organ. 32(3):100421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anupindi R, Chopra S, Deshmukh SD, Van Mieghem JA, Zemel E (2006) Managing Business Process Flows: Principles of Operations Management (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2000) IT and organizational change: An institutionalist perspective. Inform. Tech. People 13(4):234–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison DE, Fitzgerald G (2003) Where now for development methodologies? Comm. ACM 46(1):78–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison DE, Wood-Harper AT (1991) Information systems development research: An exploration of ideas in practice. Comput. J. 34(2):98–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baham C, Hirschheim R (2022) Issues, challenges, and a proposed theoretical core of agile software development research. Inform. Systems J. 32(1):103–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barroca L, Dingsøyr T, Mikalsen M (2019) Agile transformation: A summary and research agenda from the first international workshop. Hoda R, ed. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming—Workshops, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 364 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 3–9.Google Scholar
• Bass JM (2016) Artefacts and agile method tailoring in large-scale offshore software development programmes. Inform. Software Tech. 75:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baxter D, Dacre N, Dong H, Ceylan S (2023) Institutional challenges in agile adoption: Evidence from a public sector IT project. Government Inform. Quart. 40(4):101858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck K, Andres C (2004) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston).Google Scholar
• Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, et al. (2001) The agile manifesto. Accessed September 20, 2008, http://www.agilemanifesto.org/.Google Scholar
• Benlian A (2022) Sprint zeal or sprint fatigue? The benefits and burdens of agile ISD practices use for developer well-being. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):557–578.Link, Google Scholar
• Benlian A, Pinski M, Adam M (2025) Team-enacted use vs. developer-needed use of agile practices: How perceptual (in-)congruence and team feedback-seeking shape developer well-being. Inform. Systems Res. 36(4):2253–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N (2020) Agile development as the root metaphor for strategy in digital innovation. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, eds. Handbook of Digital Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 83–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Maurer C (2019) Institutional logics and pluralistic responses to enterprise system implementation: A qualitative meta-analysis. MIS Quart. 43(3):873–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Marzi G, Dabić M (2022) Guest editorial: Agile beyond software—In search of flexibility in a wide range of innovation projects and industries. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 69(6):3454–3458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birks DF, Fernandez W, Levina N, Nasirin S (2013) Grounded theory method in information systems research: Its nature, diversity and opportunities. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inform. Software Tech. 38(4):275–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campanelli AS, Camilo RD, Parreiras FS (2018) The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: A survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. J. Systems Software 137:366–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao L, Mohan K, Peng X, Ramesh B (2009) A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(4):332–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1996) Using Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn A (2002) Agile Software Development (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cockburn A (2004) Crystal Clear: A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams (Addison-Wesley Professional, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Coleman G, O’Connor R (2008) Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective. J. Systems Software 81(5):772–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conboy K (2009) Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Conboy K, Fitzgerald B (2010) Method and developer characteristics for effective agile method tailoring: A study of XP expert opinion. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology 20(1):2.Google Scholar
• Corvera Charaf M, Rosenkranz C, Holten R (2013) The emergence of shared understanding: Applying functional pragmatics to study the requirements development process. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):115–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cram WA, Newell S (2016) Mindful revolution or mindless trend? Examining agile development as a management fashion. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(2):154–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Mazza C (2003) Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations 56(3):267–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Sevón G (1996) Translating Organizational Change (Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diebold P, Dahlem M (2014) Agile practices in practice: A mapping study. Shepperd MJ, Hall T, Myrtveit I, eds. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Evaluation Assessment Software Engrg., vol. 30 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–10.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2009) What do we know about agile software development? IEEE Software 26(5):6–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmholdt KT, Nielsen JA, Wæraas A, Meyer R (2025) It takes a village: Translating management ideas through an ecology of roles. J. Management Stud. 62(7):2938–2968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B, Hartnett G, Conboy K (2006) Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(2):200–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler M, Highsmith J (2001) The agile manifesto. Software Development 9(8):28–35.Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Giardino C, Paternoster N, Unterkalmsteiner M, Gorschek T, Abrahamsson P (2016) Software development in startup companies: The greenfield startup model. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 42(6):585–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Beck R, Keil M (2013) Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Quart. 37(4):1211–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gustavsson T (2021) Institutional logics in large-scale agile software development Transformations. Gregory P, Kruchten P, eds. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming—Workshops (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 12–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Zhou J, Lee G, Zorin V (2025) Organizing for software product development: The effects of team structure, product complexity, and cross-team coordination. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print June 2, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0154.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Baroody AJ (2020) Electronic health records and the logics of care: Complementarity and conflict in the U.S. healthcare system. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):57–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassan N, Lowry P (2015) Seeking middle-range theories in information systems research. ICIS 2015 Proc., https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/IStheory/1.Google Scholar
• Henderson-Sellers B, Ralyté J, Ågerfalk PJ, Rossi M (2014) Situational Method Engineering (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoda R, Noble J, Marshall S (2012) Developing a grounded theory to explain the practices of self-organizing Agile teams. Empirical Software Engrg. 17(6):609–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hummel M, Rosenkranz C, Holten R (2013) The role of communication in agile systems development. Bus. Inform. System Engrg. 5:343–355. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hummel M, Rosenkranz C, Holten R (2015) The role of social agile practices for direct and indirect communication in information systems development teams. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 36:273–300.Google Scholar
• Iivari J (1989) A methodology for IS development as organizational change: A pragmatic contingency approach. Klein H, Kumar K, eds. Systems Development for Human Progress (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 197–217.Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Iivari N (2011) The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods. Inform. Software Tech. 53(5):509–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2022) Local adaptation without work intensification: Experimentalist governance of digital technology for mutually beneficial role reconfiguration in organizations. Organ. Sci. 33(2):571–599.Link, Google Scholar
• Kudaravalli S, Faraj S, Johnson SL (2017) A configural approach to coordinating expertise in software development teams. MIS Quart. 41(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kum ME, Kortmann S, Perols JL, Zimmermann C (2024) How digitization and agile methods influence corporate venture performance: An organizational information-processing perspective. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 71:11024–11038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larman C (2003) Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’s Guide (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lee G, Xia W (2010) Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quart. 34(1):87–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Maruping LM, Keil M (2026) Understanding factors affecting the use of agile development practices in system of systems environments. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Newman M (2008) Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(6):589–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmood Z, Uddin S (2021) Institutional logics and practice variations in sustainability reporting: Evidence from an emerging field. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. 34(5):1163–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Agarwal R (2009) A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):377–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe NB, Fægri TE, Cruzes DS, Faugstad JE (2016) Enabling knowledge sharing in agile virtual teams. Proc. 2016 IEEE 11th Internat. Conf. Global Software Engrg. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Morris T, Lancaster Z (2006) Translating management ideas. Organ. Stud. 27(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann O, Kirklies PC, Schott C (2024) Adopting agile in government: A comparative case study. Public Management Rev. 26(12):3692–3714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen JA, Mathiassen L, Newell S (2014) Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quart. 38(1):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen JA, Mathiassen L, Newell S (2022) Multidirectional idea travelling across an organizational field. Organ. Stud. 43(6):931–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pantiuchina J, Mondini M, Khanna D, Wang X, Abrahamsson P (2017) Are software startups applying agile practices? The state of the practice from a large survey. Baumeister H, Lichter H, Riebisch M, eds. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 283 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 167–183.Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen M, Haikara J, Salo O, Abrahamsson P, Still J (2008) The impact of agile practices on communication in software development. Empirical Software Engrg. 13(3):303–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppendieck M, Cusumano MA (2012) Lean software development: A tutorial. IEEE Software 29(5):26–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R (2017) The translation and adaptation of agile methods: A discourse of fragmentation and articulation. Inform. Tech. People 30(2):396–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Gopal A, Hann I-H (2017) Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):225–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Quattrone P (2015) Governing social orders, unfolding rationality, and Jesuit accounting practices: A procedural approach to institutional logics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):411–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Cao L, Kim J, Mohan K, James TL (2019) Consider culture when implementing agile practices. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 60(3):1–37.Google Scholar
• Recker J, Holten R, Hummel M, Rosenkranz C (2017) How agile practices impact customer responsiveness and development success: A field study. Project Management J. 48(2):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reineke P, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2025) Decentralization in organizations: A revolution or a mirage? Acad. Management Ann. 19(1):298–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) Managing digital platforms in user organizations: The interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):419–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Sarker S (2009) Exploring agility in distributed information systems development teams: An interpretive study in an offshoring context. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):440–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K, Beedle M (2002) Agile Software Development with Scrum (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sidky A, Arthur J, Bohner S (2007) A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: The agile adoption framework. Innovation Systems Software Engrg. 3:203–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Kim SK (2019) From bricks to an edifice: Cultivating strong inference in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):1029–1036.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B (2010) Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):288–304.Link, Google Scholar
• Tolfo C, Wazlawick RS, Ferreira MGG, Forcellini FA (2011) Agile methods and organizational culture: Reflections about cultural levels. J. Software Maintenance Evolution: Res. Practice 23(6):423–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyre MJ, Orlikowski WJ (1994) Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(1):98–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Vial G, Rivard S (2016) A process explanation of the effects of institutional distance between parties in outsourced information systems development projects. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(5):448–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vidgen R, Wang X (2009) Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):355–376.Link, Google Scholar
• Wæraas A, Nielsen JA (2016) Translation theory “translated”: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. Internat. J. Management Rev. 18(3):236–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldorff SB, Madsen MH (2023) Translating to maintain existing practices: Micro-tactics in the implementation of a new management concept. Organ. Stud. 44(3):427–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Conboy K, Pikkarainen M (2012) Assimilation of agile practices in use. Inform. Systems J. 22(6):435–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar