Firm-Sponsored Online Communities: Building Alignment Capabilities for Participatory Governance

References

• Aaltonen A, Lanzara GF (2015) Building governance capability in online social production: Insights from Wikipedia. Organ. Stud. 36(12):1649–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman M (2015) Innovating without information constraints: Organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero. Shalley CE, Hitt MA, Zhou J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, New York), 353–379.Google Scholar
• Altman EJ, Nagle F, Tushman ML (2022) The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: Engaging communities for value creation and capture. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):70–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arazy O, Daxenberger J, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Nov O, Gurevych I (2016) Turbulent stability of emergent roles: The dualistic nature of self-organizing knowledge coproduction. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):792–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Auray N (2012) Online communities and governance mechanisms. Brousseau E, Marzouki M, Méadel C, eds. Governance, Regulation and Powers on the Internet (Cambridge University Press, New York), 211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, O’Mahony S, Quinn J (2003) IBM and Linux (A). Harvard Business School Case 903083, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski W (2016) Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):704–723.Link, Google Scholar
• Berg-Jensen M, Hienerth C, Lettl C (2015) Drivers of positive attention on firm-hosted user design platforms. Acad. Management Proc. 2015(1):10601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkmann S (2014) Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. Leavy P, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (Oxford University Press, New York), 277–299.Google Scholar
• Brubaker JR, Lustig C, Hayes GR (2010) PatientsLikeMe: Empowerment and representation in a patient-centered social network. CSCW ‘10: Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Claffey E, Brady M (2017) Examining consumers’ motivations to engage in firm-hosted virtual communities. Psych. Marketing 34(4):356–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás SV (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology Soc. 15(4):38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2014) Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Res. Policy 43(5):812–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35(8):1243–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Frederiksen L, Rullani F, eds. (2008) Online communities and open innovation: Governance and symbolic value creation. Indust. Innovation 15(2):115–123.Google Scholar
• David PA, Rullani F (2008) Dynamics of innovation in an open source collaboration environment: Lurking, laboring, and launching FLOSS projects on SourceForge. Indust. Corporate Change 17(4):647–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Laat PB (2007) Governance of open source software: State of the art. J. Management Governance 11(2):165–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demil B, Lecocq X (2006) Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance. Organ. Stud. 27(10):1447–1466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé L, Paré G (2003) Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(4):597–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 7047:1–17.Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Gkeredakis E, Levina N (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):302–323.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G (2019) Online communities and firm advantages. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):279–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B (2006) The transformation of open source software. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(3):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fournier S, Lee L (2009) Getting brand communities right. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(4):105–111.Google Scholar
• Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Admin. Rev. 66(Suppl. 1):66–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Admin. Rev. 75(4):513–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galegher J, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1998) Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Comm. 15(4):493–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (2002) Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. Internat. J. Qualitative Methods 1(2):23–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R (2016) The creation of social value: Can an online health community reduce rural-urban health disparities? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(1):247–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruner RL, Homburg C, Lukas BA (2014) Firm-hosted online brand communities and new product success. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 42(1):29–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Riis J (2011) PatientsLikeMe: An online community of patients. Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Case No. 511-093, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Criscuolo P, George G (2015) Which problems to solve? Online knowledge sharing and attention allocation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 58(3):680–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halfaker A, Geiger RS, Morgan JT, Riedl J (2013) The rise and decline of an open collaboration system. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57(5):664–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch MJ, Schultz M (2010) Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance. J. Brand Management 17(8):590–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He VF, Puranam P, Shrestha YR, von Krogh G (2020) Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1837–1868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho SY, Rai A (2017) Continued voluntary participation intention in firm-participating open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):603–625.Link, Google Scholar
• Howison J, Crowston K (2014) Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2015) Knowledge sharing in online communities: Learning to cross geographic and hierarchical boundaries. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1593–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Ind N, Iglesias O, Schultz M (2013) Building brands together: Emergence and outcomes of co-creation. California Management Rev. 55(3):5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jemielniak D (2016) Wikimedia movement governance: The limits of a-hierarchical organization. J. Organ. Change Management 29(3):361–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani K (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson SL, Safadi H, Faraj S (2015) The emergence of online community leadership. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Joyce E, Pike JC, Butler BS (2013) Rules and roles vs. consensus: Self-governed deliberative mass collaboration bureaucracies. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57(5):576–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Tempini N (2014) Patient data as medical facts: Social media practices as a foundation for medical knowledge creation. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):817–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Johnson J, Majchrzak A (2014) Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Sci. 60(12):3026–3048.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LS (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):215–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2019) Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan MS (2013) LEGO products: Building customer communities through technology. Harvard Business School Case W93C26, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KRR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Fayard AL, Levina N, Pokrywa SH (2012) OpenIDEO. Harvard Business School Case 612066, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Madhok A (1996) The organization of economic activity: Transaction costs, firm capabilities, and the nature of governance. Organ. Sci. 7(5):577–590.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT (2005) Economic Foundations of Strategy (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahony SO (2005) Nonprofit foundations and their role in community-firm software collaboration. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 393–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2016) Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):685–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2019) Unleashing the Crowd: Collaborative Solutions to Wicked Business and Societal Problems (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Griffith TL, Reetz DK, Alexy O (2018) Catalyst organizations as a new organization design for innovation: The case of hyperloop transportation technologies. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(4):472–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Markus ML (2007) The governance of free/open source software projects: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? J. Management Governance 11(2):151–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marrie RA, Salter AR, Tyry T, Fox RJ, Cutter GR (2013) Preferred sources of health information in persons with multiple sclerosis: Degree of trust and information sought. J. Medical Internet Res. 15(4):e67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKee R (2013) Ethical issues in using social media for health and healthcare research. Health Policy 110(2–3):298–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Mindel V, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) The sustainability of polycentric information commons. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):607–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell E, Jurgens D, Saleem HM, Vala H, Sassine J, Armstrong C, Ruths D (2016) User migration in online social networks: A case study on Reddit during a period of community unrest. 10th Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Wuebker R, Zenger T (2017) Problems, theories, and governing the crowd. Strategic Organ. 15(2):275–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S (2007) The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? J. Management Governance 11(2):139–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Lakhani K (2011) Organizations in the shadow of communities. Communities Organ. 33:3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) A Conceptual Framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Palmer CG, Fry A, Libala N, Ralekhetla M, Mtati N, Weaver M, Mtintsilana Z, Scherman PA (2022) Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context. Anthropocene 37:100320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priharsari D, Abedin B, Mastio E (2020) Value co-creation in firm sponsored online communities. Internet Res. 30(3):763–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Przeworski A, Stokes SCS, Stokes SC, Manin B (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reischauer G, Mair J (2018) How organizations strategically govern online communities: Lessons from the sharing economy. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(3):220–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Nagle F (2020) Why do user communities matter for strategy? Strategic Management Rev. 1(2):305–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh M, Henfridsson O (2017) Governing open source software through coordination processes. Inform. Organ. 27(2):116–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh M, Vaast E (2016) Folding and unfolding: Balancing openness and transparency in open source communities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):813–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro SP (2005) Agency theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 31:263–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sibai O, de Valck K, Farrell AM, Rudd JM (2015) Social control in online communities of consumption: A framework for community management. Psych. Marketing 32(3):250–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, 1st ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Skousen T, Safadi H, Young C, Karahanna E, Safadi S, Chebib F (2020) Successful moderation in online patient communities: Inductive case study. J. Medical Internet Res. 22(3):e15983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2009) Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):180–197.Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):649–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Boudreau MC, York PT, Greiner ME, Wynn DJ (2008) The business of open source. Comm. ACM 51(4):41–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R & D Management 36(3):319–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, O’Mahony S (2008) The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Indust. Innovation 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiertz C, de Ruyter K (2007) Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):347–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1973) Markets and hierarchies, some elementary considerations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):316–325.Google Scholar
• Yan L, Tan Y, Peng J (2015) Network dynamics: How can we find patients like us? Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):496–512.Link, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeckhauser RJ, Pratt JW (1985) Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar