Just DM Me (Politely): Direct Messaging, Politeness, and Hiring Outcomes in Online Labor Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1003

References

  • Agrawal A, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2016) Does standardized information in online markets disproportionately benefit job applicants from less developed countries? J. Internat. Econom. 103:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison PD (2010) Missing Data (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Althoff T, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Jurafsky D (2014) How to ask for a favor: A case study on the success of altruistic requests. Preprint, submitted May 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3282.Google Scholar
  • Asker J, Cantillon E (2010) Procurement when price and quality matter. RAND J. Econom. 41(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • August T, Reinecke K (2019) Pay attention, please: Formal language improves attention in volunteer and paid online experiments. Proc. 2019 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, Glasgow, UK, 1–11.Google Scholar
  • Autor DH (2001) Wiring the labor market. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(1):25–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burke M, Kraut R (2008) Mind your Ps and Qs: The impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA, 281–284.Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Kumar S (2019) When does dispute resolution substitute for a reputation system? Empirical evidence from a service procurement platform. Preprint, submitted September 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436213.Google Scholar
  • Carr CT, Stefaniak C (2012) Sent from my iPhone: The medium and message as cues of sender professionalism in mobile telephony. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 40(4):403–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan J, Wang J (2017) Hiring preferences in online labor markets: Evidence of a female hiring bias. Management Sci. 64(7):2973–2994.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
  • Cheng JW, Chiu WL, Chang YY, Johnstone S (2014) Do you put your best foot forward? Interactive effects of task performance and impression management tactics on career outcomes. J. Psych. 148(6):621–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Sudhof M, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J, Potts C (2013) A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. Preprint, submitted June 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6078.Google Scholar
  • Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):395–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dranove D, Jin GZ (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Literature 48(4):935–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Rev. Econom. 8(1):615–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghani E, Kerr WR, Stanton C (2014) Diasporas and outsourcing: Evidence from oDesk and India. Management Sci. 60(7):1677–1697.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
  • Haugh M, Chang WL (2015) Understanding im/politeness across cultures: An interactional approach to raising sociopragmatic awareness. Internat. Rev. Appl. Linguistics Language Teaching 53(4):389–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks W, DeBrock L, Koenker R (2003) Uncertainty, hiring, and subsequent performance: The NFL draft. J. Labor Econom. 21(4):857–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):547–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Wang C, Pavlou PA (2016) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):49–69.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horton J (2019) Buyer uncertainty about seller capacity: Causes, consequences, and partial solution. Management Sci. 65(8):3518–3540.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • House J (2012) (Im)politeness in cross-cultural encounters. Language Intercultural Comm. 12(4):284–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Y, Tafti A, Gal D (2019) Read this, please? The role of politeness in customer service engagement on social media. Proc. 52nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Hawaii.Google Scholar
  • Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2020) Unemployment and worker participation in the gig economy: Evidence from an online labor market. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):431–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J (1984) Perspectives on information overload. J. Consumer Res. 10(4):432–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeong M, Minson J, Yeomans M, Gino F (2019) Communicating with warmth in distributive negotiations is surprisingly counterproductive. Management Sci. 65(12):5813–5837.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jessmer SL, Anderson D (2001) The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North Amer. J. Psych. 3(2):331–346.Google Scholar
  • Kokkodis M, Ipeirotis PG (2015) Reputation transferability in online labor markets. Management Sci. 62(6):1687–1706.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee SY, Rui H, Whinston AB (2019) Is best answer really the best answer? The politeness bias. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(2):579–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li C, Poskitt DS, Zhao X (2019) The bivariate probit model, maximum likelihood estimation, pseudo true parameters and partial identification. J. Econometrics 209(1):94–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang C, Hong Y, Gu B (2016) Effects of IT-enabled monitoring on labor contracting in online platforms: Evidence from a natural experiment. NET Institute Working Paper No. 16-01, NET Institute, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Lin M, Liu Y, Viswanathan S (2018) Effectiveness of reputation in contracting for customized production: Evidence from online labor markets. Management Sci. 64(1):345–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luijkx A, Gerritsen M, van Mulken M (2020) The effect of Dutch student errors in German business letters on German professionals. Bus. Professional Comm. Quart. 83(1):34–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lv Z, Jin Y, Huang J (2018) How do sellers use live chat to influence consumer purchase decision in China? Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 28:102–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin‐Lacroux C (2017) “Without the spelling errors I would have shortlisted her…:” The impact of spelling errors on recruiters’ choice during the personnel selection process. Internat. J. Selection Assessment 25(3):276–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melitz J, Toubal F (2014) Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. J. Internat. Econom. 93(2):351–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morand DA, Ocker RJ (2003) Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: A sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages. Proc. 36th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Big Island, Hawaii).Google Scholar
  • Moreno A, Terwiesch C (2014) Doing business with strangers: Reputation in online service marketplaces. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):865–886.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ogiermann E (2009) Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. J. Politeness Res. 5(2):189–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ou CX, Pavlou PA, Davison RM (2014) Swift Guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):209–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pallais A (2014) Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(11):3565–3599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan X, Wang Y, Tan Y (2019) Impact of live chat on purchase in electronic markets: The moderating role of information cues. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1248–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Voigt R, Camp NP, Prabhakaran V, Hamilton WL, Hetey RC, Griffiths CM, Jurgens D, Jurafsky D, Eberhardt JL (2017) Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(25):6521–6526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y (2020) The price of being polite: Politeness, social status, and their joint impacts on community Q&A efficiency. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 19:1–22.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.