Making Digital Innovation Happen: A Chief Information Officer Issue Selling Perspective

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Alt E, Craig JB (2016) Selling issues with solutions: Igniting social intrapreneurship in for-profit organizations. J. Management Stud. 53(5):794–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff HI (1980) Strategic issue management. Strategic Management J. 1(2):131–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CP, Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):304–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Hu N, Pavlou PA, Luftman J (2011) CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(2):487–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Heracleous L, Walsham G (2013) A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quart. 37(1):201–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J. 3(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter M, Grover V, Thatcher JB (2011) The emerging CIO role of business technology strategist. MIS Quart. Executive 10(1).Google Scholar
• Chen DQ, Preston DS, Xia W (2010b) Antecedents and impacts of CIO supply-side and demand-side leadership: A staged maturity model. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):231–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DQ, Mocker M, Preston DS, Teubner A (2010a) Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quart. 34(2):233–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London), 295–336.Google Scholar
• Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Castañer X, Belausteguigoitia I (2011) Entrepreneurial initiative selling within organizations: Towards a more comprehensive motivational framework. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1269–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dörrenbächer C, Gammelgaard J (2016) Subsidiary initiative taking in multinational corporations: The relationship between power and issue selling. Organ. Stud. 37(9):1249–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):397–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Lawrence KA, Miner-Rubino K (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ. Sci. 13(4):355–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Lawrence KA (2001) Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Acad. Management J. 44(4):716–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Hayes E, Wierba EE (1997) Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management J. 18(5):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl MJ, Feeny DF (1994) Is your CIO adding value? Sloan Management Rev. 35(3):11–20.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA (2010) Engaging CIO-CxO “conversations that matter”: An interview with Peter Keen. MIS Quart. Executive 9(1):61–64.Google Scholar
• Enns HG, Huff SL, Higgins CA (2003) CIO lateral influence behaviors: Gaining peer’s commitment to strategic information systems. MIS Quart. 27(1):155–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard A-L, Gkeredakis E, Levina N (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):302–323.Link, Google Scholar
• Feeny DF, Edwards B, Simpson KM (1992) Understanding the CEO/CIO relationship. MIS Quart. 16(4):435–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Dos Santos BL, Zheng ZE (2014) Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quart. 38(2):329–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick D (1996) Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Floyd SW, Wooldridge B (1997) Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. J. Management Stud. 34(3):465–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell M, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Duong MQ, Kelcey BM (2013) What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Ed. Evaluation Policy Anal. 35(4):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerth AB, Peppard J (2014) How newly appointed CIOs take charge. MIS Quart. Executive 13(3):159–173.Google Scholar
• Gerth AB, Peppard J (2016) The dynamics of CIO derailment: How CIOs come undone and how to avoid it. Bus. Horizons 59(1):61–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman R (2016) The industries that are being disrupted the most by digital. Accessed March 1, 2021, https://hbr.org/2016/03/the-industries-that-are-being-disrupted-the-most-by-digital.Google Scholar
• Hambrick D, Finkelstein S (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. (9):369–407.Google Scholar
• Hambrick D, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harman HH (1967) Modern Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Greenville JA (2007) Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organ. Sci. 18(4):560–577.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson AM, Lederer AL (2005) The effect of communication frequency and channel richness on the convergence between chief executive and chief information officers. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(2):227–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Preston DS (2013) The effect of social capital of the relationship between the CIO and top management team on firm performance. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):15–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Watson RT (2006) Information systems leadership. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(2):171–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karpovsky A, Galliers RD (2013) The power and influence of chief information officers (CIOs) in IS strategizing. 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milan.Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, McIntosh CN (2017) Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. J. Oper. Management (52):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Mackay JM (2007) How incoming CIOs transition into their new jobs. MIS Quart. Executive 6(1):17–28.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tan C-H, Teo H-H, Tan BCY (2006) Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: Do CIO characteristics make a difference? IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(2):177–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ling Y, Floyd SW, Baldridge DC (2005) Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 36(6):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ferris GR, Zinko R, Perrewé PL, Weitz B, Xu J (2007) Dispositional antecedents and outcomes of political skill in organizations: A four-study investigation with convergence. J. Vocational Behav. 71(1):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lokuge S, Sedera D, Grover V, Xu D (2019) Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Inform. Management 56(3):445–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu G, Ding XD, Peng DX, Chuang HH-C (2018) Addressing endogeneity in operations management research: Recent developments, common problems, and directions for future research. J. Oper. Management (64):53–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masli A, Richardson VJ, Watson MW, Zmud RW (2016) Senior executives’ IT management responsibilities: Serious IT-related deficiencies and CEO/CFO turnover. MIS Quart. 40(3):687–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT (1979) Leader characteristics, self-confidence, and methods of upward influence in organizational decision situations. Acad. Management J. 22(4):709–725.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organization. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Peppard J, Edwards C, Lambert R (2011) Clarifying the ambiguous role of the CIO. MIS Quart. Executive. 10(1):31–44.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston DS, Karahanna E (2009) The antecedents of IS strategic alignment: A nomological network. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):159–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Preston DS, Chen DQ, Leidner DE (2008) Examining the antecedents and consequences of CIO strategic decision-making authority: An empirical study. Decision Sci. 39(4):605–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston DS, Karahanna E, Rowe F (2006) Development of shared understanding between the chief information officer and top management team in U.S. and French organizations: A cross-culture comparison. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(2):191–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Grover V (2012) Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(4):231–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 66(5):688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siebel TM (2017) Why digital transformation is now on the CEO’s shoulders. McKinsey Quart. Accessed April 4, 2021, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/why-digital-transformation-is-now-on-the-ceos-shoulders#.Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh A, Hess T (2017) How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quart. Executive 16(1):1–17.Google Scholar
• Smaltz DH, Sambamurthy V, Agarwal R (2006) The antecedents of CIO role effectiveness in organizations: An empirical study in the healthcare sector. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(2):207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo Cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Tanriverdi H (2018) Impact of the information technology unit on information technology-embedded product innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):716–751.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of the digital photography company. Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tumbas S, Berente N, Brocke Jv (2017) Three types of chief digital officers and the reasons organizations adopt the role. MIS Quart. Executive 16(2):121–134.Google Scholar
• Tumbas S, Berente N, Brocke Jv (2018) Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. J. Inform. Tech. 33(3):188–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2005) Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies. MIS Quart. 29(2):365–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei L, Chiang FFT, Wu L (2012) Developing and utilizing network resources: Roles of political skill. J. Management Stud. 49(2):381–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P, Woerner SL (2013) The future of the CIO in a digital economy. MIS Quart. Executive 12(2):65–75.Google Scholar
• Wickert C, De Bakker FGA (2018) Pitching for social change: Toward a relational approach to selling and buying social issues. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(1):50–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge B, Floyd SW (1990) The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 11(3):231–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar