Network Interconnectivity and Entry into Platform Markets

References

• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8(3):289–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Chen J, Zhu F (2020) Frenemies in platform markets: Heterogeneous profit foci as drivers of compatibility decisions. Management Sci. 66(6):2432–2451.Link, Google Scholar
• Afuah A (2013) Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic MaNagement J. 34(3):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Foros Ø, Kind HJ (2019) The importance of consumer multihoming (joint purchases) for market performance: Mergers and entry in media markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(1):125–137.Google Scholar
• Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerji A, Dutta B (2009) Local network externalities and market segmentation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(5):605–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell A (2013) Word-of-mouth communication and percolation in social networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2466–2498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Halaburda H (2014) When does a platform create value by limiting choice? J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):259–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Guo Z (2014) New media advertising and retail platform openness. Preprint, submitted August 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694073.Google Scholar
• Chen J, Fan M, Li M (2016) Advertising vs. brokerage model for online trading platforms. MIS Quart. 40(3):575–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debruyne M, Moenaertb R, Griffinc A, Hartd S, Hultinke EJ, Robben H (2002) The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets. J. Product Innovation Management 19(2):159–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis S (2017) Unsustainable customer acquisition costs make much of ecommerce profit proof. Forbes (August 31). https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevendennis/2017/08/31/unsustainable-customer-acquisition-costs-make-much-of-ecommerce-profit-proof/.Google Scholar
• Dickey MR (2019) Ahead of IPO, Airbnb achieves profitability for second year in a row. TechCrunch (January 15), https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/15/ahead-of-ipo-airbnb-achieves-profitability-for-second-year-in-a-row/Google Scholar
• Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.Link, Google Scholar
• Esteves RB, Resende J (2016) Competitive targeted advertising with price discrimination. Marketing Sci. 35(4):576–587.Link, Google Scholar
• Franklin J (2019) Uber unveils IPO with warning it may never make a profit. Reuters (April 11), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-ipo/uber-unveils-ipo-with-warning-it-may-never-make-a-profit-idUSKCN1RN2SK.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):361–366.Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Goyal S (2009) Influencing the influencers: A theory of strategic diffusion. RAND J. Econom. 40(3):509–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 13(4):421–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hann IH, Koh B, Niculescu MF (2016) The double-edged sword of backward compatibility: The adoption of multigenerational platforms in the presence of intergenerational services. Inform. Systems. Res. 27(1):112–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Hao L, Guo H, Easley RF (2017) A mobile platform’s inapp advertising contract under agency pricing for app sales. Production Oper. Management 26(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):547–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2013) Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Sci. 59(1):102–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Srinivasan K (2016) Pricing and persuasive advertising in a differentiated market. Marketing Lett. 27(3):579–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karakaya F, Yannopoulos P (2011) Impact of market entrant characteristics on incumbent reactions to market entry. J. Strategic Marketing 19(2):171–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh TK, Fichman M (2014) Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks. MIS Quart. 38(4):977–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuang L, Huang N, Hong Y, Yan Z (2019) Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: Evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):289–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leduc MV, Jackson MO, Johari R (2017) Pricing and referrals in diffusion on networks. Games Econom. Behav. 104(July):568–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Lee J, Lee J (2006) Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Sci. 52(12):1838–1848.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee GM, Qiu L, Whinston AB (2016) A friend like me: Modeling network formation in a location-based social network. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1008–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Agarwal A (2017) Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Management Sci. 63(10):3438–3458.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S (2002) Re-Thinking the Network Economy: The True Forces That Drive the Digital Marketplace (Amacom, New York).Google Scholar
• Manshadi V, Misra S, Rodilitz S (2020) Diffusion in random networks: Impact of degree distribution. Oper. Res. 68(6):1722–1741.Google Scholar
• Niculescu MF, Wu DJ, Xu L (2018) Strategic intellectual property sharing: Competition on an open technology platform under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):498–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10): 1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Rui H, Whinston AB (2014) The impact of social network structures on prediction market accuracy in the presence of insider information. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):145–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) When do switching costs make markets more or less competitive? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 47:121–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez F (2005) Network effects revisited: The role of strong ties on technology selection. Acad. Management J. 48(4):710–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2007) Local network effects and complex network structure. B.E. J. Theoret. Econom. 7(1):1–37.Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Yin E, Niraj R (2009) Does quality win? Network effects vs. quality in high-tech markets. J. Marketing Res. 46(2):135–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson GL, Teng JT (1984) Optimal pricing and advertising policies for new product oligopoly models. Marketing Sci. 3(2):148–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Tian L, Vakharia AJ, Tan Y, Xu Y, (2018) Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: A strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Production Oper. Management 27(8):1595–1610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu H (2018) Is more information better? An economic analysis of group-buying platforms. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(11):1130–1144.Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Chen J, Raghunathan S (2018) Platform competition in ride sharing economy. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar