Estimating the Impact of “Humanizing” Customer Service Chatbots

References

• Aaker JL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):347–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araujo T (2018) Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Human Behav. 85:183–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett JL, Keil FC (1996) Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in god concepts. Cognitive Psych. 31(3):219–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2008) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Internat. J. Soc. Robotics 1(1):71–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caporael L (1986) Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine. Comput. Human Behav. 2(3):215–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassell J, Bickmore T (2000) External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Comm. ACM 43(12):50–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crozier R (2017) Lufthansa delays chatbot’s responses to make it more ‘human’. iTnews (May 24), https://www.itnews.com.au/news/lufthansa-delays-chatbots-responses-to-make-it-more-human-462643.Google Scholar
• Dale R (2016) The return of the chatbots. Natl. Language Engrg. 22(05):811–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Dolen WMV, Ruyter KD, Streukens S (2008) The effect of humor in electronic service encounters. J. Econom. Psych. 29(2):160–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Don A, Brennan S, Laurel B, Shneiderman B (1992) Anthropomorphism: from Eliza to Terminator 2. Bauersfeld P, Bennett JL, Lynch GF, eds. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 67–70.Google Scholar
• Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics Autonomous Systems 42(3–4):177–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes A (2017) Chatbots vs apps: The final frontier. Chatbots Magazine (December 8), https://chatbotsmagazine.com/chatbots-vs-apps-the-final-frontier-a0df10861c48.Google Scholar
• Francis L, Monahan K, Berger C (1999) A laughing matter? The uses of humor in medical interactions. Motivation Emotion 23:155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frei E, Elias A, Wheeler C, Richardson P, Hryniuk W (1998) The relationship between high-dose treatment and combination chemotherapy: The concept of summation dose intensity. Clinical Cancer Res. 4(9):2027–2037.Google Scholar
• Fussell SR, Kiesler S, Setlock LD, Yew V (2008) How people anthropomorphize robots. Fong T, Dautenhahn K, Scheutz M, Demiris Y, eds. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Human Robot Interaction (HRI). (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub DW (2003) Managing user trust in B2C e-services. e-Service J. 2(2):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gnewuch U, Morana S, Adam M, Maedche A (2018) Faster is not always better: Understanding the effect of dynamic response delays in human-chatbot interaction. Twenty-Sixth Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems, Portsmouth, UK.Google Scholar
• Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proc. 12th IEEE Internat. Workshop Robot Human Interactive Comm. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 55–60.Google Scholar
• Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.Google Scholar
• Guthrie SE (1995) Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Amer. J. Psych. 57(2):243–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtgraves T (2013) Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtgraves T, Han TL (2007) A procedure for studying online conversational processing using a chat bot. Behav. Res. Methods 39(1):156–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtgraves T, Ross S, Weywadt C, Han T (2007) Perceiving artificial social agents. Comput. Human Behav. 23(5):2163–2174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzwarth M, Janiszewski C, Neumann MM (2006) The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. J. Marketing 70(4):19–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain H, Padmanabhan B, Pavlou PA, Santanam RT (2018) Call for papers—Special issue of Information Systems Research—Humans, algorithms, and augmented intelligence: The future of work, organizations, and society. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):250–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy JS (1992) The New Anthropomorphism (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Siegel J, Mcguire TW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Amer. Psych. 39(10):1123–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Sproull L, Waters K (1996) A prisoners dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(1):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Powers A, Fussell SR, Torrey C (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Soc. Cognition 26(2):169–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):237–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebman N, Gergle D (2016) It’s (not) simply a matter of time: The relationship between CMC cues and interpersonal affinity. Proc. 19th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 570–581.Google Scholar
• Logg JM, Minson JA, Moore DA (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Malle BF, Pearce GE (2001) Attention to behavioral events during interaction: Two actor-observer gaps and three attempts to close them. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(2):278–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone PB (1980) Humor: A double-edged tool for today’s managers? Acad. Management Rev. 5(3):357–360.Google Scholar
• Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Statist. 18(1):50–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathur MB, Reichling DB (2016) Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the uncanny valley. Cognition 146:22–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendrick J (2018) Artificial intelligence isn’t killing jobs; it’s killing business models. Forbes (January 25), https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2018/01/25/artificial-intelligence-isnt-killing-jobs-its-killing-business-models/?sh=736be6315ea0.Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Ostrom AL, Roundtree RI, Bitner MJ (2000) Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Marketing 64(3):50–64.Google Scholar
• Mone G (2016) The edge of the uncanny. Comm. ACM 59(9):17–19.Google Scholar
• Moon Y (1999) The effects of physical distance and response latency on persuasion in computer-mediated communication and human–computer communication. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 5(4):379–392.Google Scholar
• Moon Y (2000) Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self disclosure from consumers. J. Consumer Res. 26(4):323–339.Google Scholar
• Moretti L, Pellegrino GD (2010) Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion 10(2):169–180.Google Scholar
• Morkes J, Kernal HK, Nass C (1999) Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human–Comput. Interaction 14(4):395–435.Google Scholar
• Möttönen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo-Repo M, Nissilä M, Kautiainen H, Korpela M, Laasonen L, et al. (1999) Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised trial. Lancet 353(9164):1568–1573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nass C, Lee KM (2001) Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. J. Experiment. Psych Appl. 7(3):171–181.Google Scholar
• Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):81–103.Google Scholar
• Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. Adelson B, Dumais ST, Olson J, eds. Conf. Companion Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 72–78.Google Scholar
• National Law Review (2019) Get all of your bots in a row: 2018 California bot disclosure law comes online soon. (June 7), https://www.natlawreview.com/article/get-all-your-bots-row-2018-california-bot-disclosure-law-comes-online-soon.Google Scholar
• Niculescu A, Dijk BV, Nijholt A, Li H, See SL (2013) Making social robots more attractive: The effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. Internat. J. Soc. Robotics 5(2):171–191.Google Scholar
• Nowak KL, Biocca F (2003) The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environments 12(5):481–494.Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1977) Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psych. 62(4):480–486.Google Scholar
• Powers A, Kiesler S (2006) The advisor robot. Goodrich MA, Schultz AC, Bruemmer Dj, eds. Proc. 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conf. Human Robot Interaction (HRI) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Google Scholar
• Sah YJ, Peng W (2015) Effects of visual and linguistic anthropomorphic cues on social perception, self-awareness, and information disclosure in a health website. Comput. Human Behav. 45:392–401.Google Scholar
• Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Sci. 300(5626):1755–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L, Subramani M, Kiesler S, Walker J, Waters K (1996) When the interface is a face. Human Comput. Interaction 11(2):97–124.Google Scholar
• Sun L (2107) Facebook Inc's chatbots hit a 70% failure rate. Motley Fool (February 28), https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/02/28/facebook-incs-chatbots-hit-a-70-failure-rate.aspx.Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Cappelli P, Yakubovich V (2019) Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Rev. 61(4):15–42.Google Scholar
• Taylor S (1994) Waiting for service: The relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J. Marketing 58(2):56–69.Google Scholar
• Torta E, Dijk EV, Ruijten PAM, Cuijpers RH (2013) The ultimatum game as measurement tool for anthropomorphism in human–robot interaction. Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, Bremner P, Spiers A, Leonards U, eds. Social Robotics Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland), 209–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhagen T, Nes JV, Feldberg F, Dolen WV (2014) Virtual customer service agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(3):529–545.Google Scholar
• Walther JB (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Comm. Res. 19(1):52–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB, Tidwell LC (1995) Nonverbal cues in computer mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. J. Organ. Comput. 5(4):355–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang LC, Baker J, Wagner JA, Wakefield K (2007a) Can a retail website be social? J. Marketing 71(3):143–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang FY, Carley KM, Zeng D, Mao W (2007b) Social computing: From social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(2):79–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss A, Bartneck C (2015) Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. 2015 24th IEEE Internat. Sympos. Robot Human Interactive Comm. (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan, 381–388.Google Scholar
• Wilson H, Daugherty P, Bianzino N (2017) When AI becomes the new face of your brand. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 27), https://hbr.org/2017/06/when-ai-becomes-the-new-face-of-your-brand.Google Scholar
• Wirtz J, Patterson PG, Kunz WH, Gruber T, Lu VN, Paluch S, Martins A (2018) Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. J. Service Management 29(5):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu K, Lombard M (2017) Persuasive computing: Feeling peer pressure from multiple computer agents. Comput. Human Behav. 74:152–162.Crossref, Google Scholar