How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1074

References

  • Adamopoulos P, Tuzhilin A, Ghose A (2021) Heterogeneous demand effects of recommendation strategies in a mobile application: Evidence from econometric models and machine-learning instruments. MIS Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2013) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):956–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2018) Effects of online recommendations on consumers’ willingness to pay. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):84–102.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Curley S, Zhang J (2019) Reducing recommender systems biases: An investigation of rating display designs. MIS Quart. 43(4):1321–1341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos JY (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beatty SE, Homer P, Kahle LR (1988) The involvement–commitment model: Theory and implications. J. Bus. Res. 16(2):149–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bodapati AV (2008) Recommendation systems with purchase data. J. Marketing Res. 45(1):77–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bullock JG, Ha SE (2011) Mediation analysis is harder than it looks. Druckman JN, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Cambridge University Press, New York), 508–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De P, Hu Y, Rahman MS (2010) Technology usage and online sales: An empirical study. Management Sci. 56(11):1930–1945.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dellaert BG, Häubl G (2012) Searching in choice mode: Consumer decision processes in product search with recommendations. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):277–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dieckmann A, Dippold K, Dietrich H (2009) Compensatory vs. noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences. Judgment Decision Making 4(3):200–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl K (2005) When two rights make a wrong: Searching too much in ordered environments. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):313–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dzyabura D, Hauser JR (2019) Recommending products when consumers learn their preference weights. Marketing Sci. 38(3):417–441.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform. Soc. 20(5):325–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55(5):697–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2019) Modeling consumer footprints on search engines: An interplay with social media. Management Sci. 65(3):1363–1385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J, Oestreicher-Singer G, Reichman S (2012) The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):452–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Häubl G, Murray KB (2003) Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):75–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Häubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Liao L, Zhang H, Nie L, Hu X, Chua T-S (2017) Neural collaborative filtering. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, 173–182.Google Scholar
  • Heimbach I, Hinz O (2018) The impact of sharing mechanism design on content sharing in online social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):592–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks R, Tingley D (2011) Causal mediation analysis. Stata J. 11(4):605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinz O, Eckert J, Skiera B (2011) Drivers of the long tail phenomenon: An empirical analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):43–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Houston M, Osborne M, Rimmer R (2015) Private schooling and admission to medicine: a case study using matched samples and causal mediation analysis. BMC Medical Ed. 15(1):1–7.Google Scholar
  • Hui SK, Inman JJ, Huang Y, Suher J (2013) The effect of in-store travel distance on unplanned spending: Applications to mobile promotion strategies. J. Marketing 77(2):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010a) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psych. Methods 15(4):309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010b) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(4):765–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Angrist JD (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q, Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2004) Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):194–210.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2015) Identifying mechanisms behind policy interventions via causal mediation analysis. J. Policy Anal. Management 34(4):937–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Imai K (2012) Causal mediation analysis with an application to a job search intervention. Proc. Assoc. Public Policy Anal. Management Fall Res. Conf.Google Scholar
  • Krasnova H, Widjaja T, Buxmann P, Wenninger H, Benbasat I(2015) Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar A, Hosanagar K (2019) Measuring the value of recommendation links on product demand. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):819–838.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar A, Tan Y (2015) The demand effects of joint product advertising in online videos. Management Sci. 61(8):1921–1937.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K (2019) How do recommender systems affect sales diversity? A cross-category investigation via randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):239–259.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K (2021) How do product attributes and reviews moderate the impact of recommender systems through purchase stages? Management Sci. 67(1):524–546.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D, Gopal A, Park S-H (2016) Mobile & me: An experiment of individual heterogeneity and channel use in recommendation systems. Proc. Acad. Management 2016 Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, August 5–9.Google Scholar
  • Lin Z, Goh KY, Heng CS (2017) The demand effects of product recommendation networks: An empirical analysis of network diversity and stability. MIS Quart. 41(2):397–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaelidou N, Dibb S (2008) Consumer involvement: A new perspective. Marketing Rev. 8(1):83–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitra A, Lynch JG Jr (1995) Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. J. Consumer Res. 21(4):644–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moe WW (2006) An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to internet clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):680–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nedungadi P (1990) Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 17(3):263–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012a) Recommendation networks and the long tail of electronic commerce. MIS Quart. 36(1):65–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012b) The visible hand? Demand effects of recommendation networks in electronic markets. Management Sci. 58(11):1963–1981.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pathak B, Garfinkel R, Gopal RD, Venkatesan R, Yin F (2010) Empirical analysis of the impact of recommender systems on sales. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):159–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng J (2019) Identification of causal mechanisms from randomized experiments. Preprint, submitted December 16, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3494856.Google Scholar
  • Pereira RE (2001) Influence of query-based decision aids on consumer decision making in electronic commerce. Inform. Resources Management J. 14(1):31–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quester P, Lim AL (2003) Product involvement/brand loyalty: Is there a link? J. Product Brand Management 12(1):22–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR (2002) Attributing effects to treatment in matched observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97(457):183–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro S, MacInnis DJ, Heckler SE (1997) The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 24(1):94–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shocker AD, Ben-Akiva M, Boccara B, Nedungadi P (1991) Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Lett. 2(3):181–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shukla AD, Gao GG, Agarwal R (2021) How digital word-of-mouth affects consumer decision making: Evidence from doctor appointment booking. Management Sci. 67(3):1546–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM (2009) A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv. Artif. Intell. 2009:421425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan V (2003) The impact of recommendation agents on consumer evaluation and choice: The moderating role of category risk, product complexity, and consumer knowledge. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1):93–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tam KY, Ho SY (2006) Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quart. 30(4):865–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Traylor MB (1984) Ego involvement and brand commitment: Not necessarily the same. J. Consumer Marketing 1(2):75–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Traylor MB, Joseph WB (1984) Measuring consumer involvement in products: Developing a general scale. Psych. Marketing 1(2):65–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai H-T, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quart. 38(1):143–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valeri L, VanderWeele TJ (2013) Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psych. Methods 18(2):137–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • VanderWeele T (2015) Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • VanderWeele TJ (2016) Mediation analysis: A practitioner’s guide. Annual Rev. Public Health. 37:17–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. 31(1):137–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang T, Agarwal R, Lucas HC Jr (2011) The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: Personalized product recommendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets. MIS Quart. 35(4):859–881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao X, Lynch JG Jr, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):197–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou W, Duan W (2016) Do professional reviews affect online user choices through user reviews? An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):202–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.