Gamified Challenges in Online Weight-Loss Communities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1081

References

  • Alexy B (1985) Goal setting and health risk reduction. Nursing Res. 34(5):283–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allam A, Kostova Z, Nakamoto K, Schulz PJ (2015) The effect of social support features and gamification on a web-based intervention for rheumatoid arthritis patients: Randomized controlled trial. J. Medical Internet Res. 17(1):e14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Annesi JJ (1998) Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Perceptual Motor Skills 87(2):723–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avenell A, Brown TJ, McGee MA, Campbell MK, Grant AM, Broom J, Jung RT, Smith WCS (2004) What interventions should we add to weight reducing diets in adults with obesity? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of adding drug therapy, exercise, behaviour therapy or combinations of these interventions. J. Human Nutrition Dietetics 17(4):293–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger M, Jung C (2021) Gamification in nutrition apps—users’ gamification element preferences: A best-worst-scaling approach. Proc. 54th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 1335–1344.Google Scholar
  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boendermaker WJ, Boffo M, Wiers RW (2015) Exploring elements of fun to motivate youth to do cognitive bias modification. Games Health J. 4(6):434–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Booth AO, Nowson CA, Matters H (2008) Evaluation of an interactive, internet-based weight loss program: A pilot study. Health Ed. Res. 23(3):371–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brownell KD, Cohen RY, Stunkard AJ, Felix MR, Cooley NB (1984) Weight loss competitions at the work site: Impact on weight, morale and cost-effectiveness. Amer. J. Public Health 74(11):1283–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bui A, Veit D, Webster J (2015) Gamification—a novel phenomenon or a new wrapping for existing concepts? Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Fort Worth, TX, December 13–16.Google Scholar
  • Burke V, Mori TA, Giangiulio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S, Cutt HE, Mansour J, Wilson A (2002) An innovative program for changing health behaviours. Asia Pacific J. Clinical Nutrition 11:S586–S597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter FA, Jansen A (2012) Improving psychological treatment for obesity. Which eating behaviours should we target? Appetite 58(3):1063–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C (2012) The medical care costs of obesity: An instrumental variables approach. J. Health Econom. 31(1):219–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Pu P (2014) HealthyTogether: Exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applications. Proc. Second Internat. Sympos. Chinese CHI (ACM, New York), 25–34.Google Scholar
  • Cheng HNH, Wu WMC, Liao CCY, Chan TW (2009) Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Comput. Ed. 53(3):866–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper Z, Fairburn CG (2001) A new cognitive behavioural approach to the treatment of obesity. Behav. Res. Therapy 39(5):499–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Curioni CC, Lourenco PM (2005) Long-term weight loss after diet and exercise: A systematic review. Internat. J. Obesity 29(10):1168–1174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis TA, O’Toole LJ (2014) Mental health on the go: Effects of a gamified attention-bias modification mobile application in trait-anxious adults. Clinical Psych. Sci. 2(5):576–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L (2011) From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proc. 15th Internat. Academic MindTrek Conf.: Envisioning Future Media Environments (ACM, New York), 9–15.Google Scholar
  • De Vet E, Nelissen RM, Zeelenberg M, De Ridder DT (2013) Ain’t no mountain high enough? Setting high weight loss goals predict effort and short-term weight loss. J. Health Psych. 18(5):638–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domínguez A, Saenz-de-Navarrete J, De-Marcos L, Fernández-Sanz L, Pagés C, Martínez-Herráiz JJ (2013) Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Comput. Ed. 63:380–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfhag K, Rössner S (2005) Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obesity Rev. 6(1):67–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 303(3):235–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fothergill E, Guo J, Howard L, Kerns JC, Knuth ND, Brychta R, Chen KY, et al. (2016) Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition. Obesity 24(8):1612–1619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia SM, Tor A (2009) The N-effect: More competitors, less competition. Psych. Sci. 20(7):871–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia SM, Tor A, Gonzalez R (2006) Ranks and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(7):970–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene J, Sacks R, Piniewski B, Kil D, Hahn JS (2013) The impact of an online social network with wireless monitoring devices on physical activity and weight loss. J. Primary Care Comm. Health 4(3):189–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamari J, Koivisto J (2015) “Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Comput. Human Behav. 50:333–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanus MD, Fox J (2015) Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Ed. 80(January):152–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5(4):475–492.Google Scholar
  • Hill JO, Peters JC (1998) Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Sci. 280(5368):1371–1374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, Callister R, Plotnikoff R, Collins CE (2015) eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Obesity Rev. 16(5):376–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, Cannon-Diehl MR, Richardson O, Bernstam EV, Thomas EJ (2010) Social support in an internet weight loss community. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 79(1):5–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens G, Wooldridge J (2007) What’s new in econometrics. Lecture notes 1, July 30, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Jeffery RW, Wing RR, Sherwood NE, Tate DF (2003 Physical activity and weight loss: Does prescribing higher physical activity goals improve outcome? Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 78(4):684–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johns DJ, Hartmann-Boyce J, Jebb SA, Aveyard P (2014) Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. J. Acad. Nutrition Dietetics 114(10):1557–1568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D, Deterding S, Kuhn KA, Staneva A, Stoyanov S, Hides L (2016) Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions 6:89–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones BA, Madden GJ, Wengreen HJ (2014) The FIT game: Preliminary evaluation of a gamification approach to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in school. Preventive Medicine 68:76–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khaylis A, Yiaslas T, Bergstrom J, Gore-Felton C (2010) A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: Five key components. Telemedicine e-Health 16(9):931–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn A (1992) No Contest: A Case Against Competition (Houghton Mifflin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Liu D, Li X, Santhanam R (2013) Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete? MIS Quart. 111–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu D, Santhanam R, Webster J (2016) Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quart. 41(4):1011–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA (1968) Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 3(2):157–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1985) The application of goal setting to sports. J. Sport Exercise Psych. 7(3):205–222.Google Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psychologist 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maher C, Ferguson M, Vandelanotte C, Plotnikoff R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Thomas S, Nelson-Field K, Olds T (2015) A web-based, social networking physical activity intervention for insufficiently active adults delivered via Facebook app: Randomized controlled trial. J. Medical Internet Res. 17(7):e4086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE (2001) The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: A randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care 24(8):1328–1334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD (2013) Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity 21(1):25–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Institutes of Health (2002) The practical guide: Identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. NIH publication 00-4084, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  • Nelissen R, de Vet E, Zeelenberg M (2011) Anticipated emotions and effort allocation in weight goal striving. British J. Health Psych. 16(1):201–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE (2010) Effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Obesity Rev. 11(4):306–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patrick K, Raab F, Adams M, Dillon L, Zabinski M, Rock CL, Griswold WG, Norman GJ (2009) A text message-based intervention for weight loss: Randomized controlled trial. J. Medical Internet Res. 11(1):e1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearson ES (2012) Goal setting as a health behavior change strategy in overweight and obese adults: A systematic literature review examining intervention components. Patient Ed. Counseling 87(1):32–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poncela-Casasnovas J, Spring B, McClary D, Moller AC, Mukogo R, Pellegrini CA, Coons MJ, Davidson M, Mukherjee S, Nunes Amaral LA (2015) Social embeddedness in an online weight management program is linked to greater weight loss. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 12(104):20140686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rancourt D, Leahey TM, LaRose JG, Crowther JH (2015) Effects of weight‐focused social comparisons on diet and activity outcomes in overweight and obese young women. Obesity 23(1):85–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reeve J, Deci EL (1996) Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(1):24–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riva S, Camerini AL, Allam A, Schulz PJ (2014) Interactive sections of an internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: Randomized controlled trial. J. Medical Internet Res. 16(8):e3474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roodman D (2009a) How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 9(1):86–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roodman D (2009b) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 71(1):135–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. Amer. Psychologist 55(1):68–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam R, Liu D, Shen WCM (2016) Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):453–465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seijts GH, Latham GP (2001) The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. J. Organ. Behav. 22(3):291–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shameli A, Althoff T, Saberi A, Leskovec J (2017) How gamification affects physical activity: Large-scale analysis of walking challenges in a mobile application. Proc. 26th Internat. World Wide Web Conf., Perth, Australia, April 3–7, 455–463.Google Scholar
  • Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS (2004) Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Amer. J. Health Promotion 19(2):81–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silva MN, Vieira PN, Coutinho SR, Minderico CS, Matos MG, Sardinha LB, Teixeira PJ (2010) Using self-determination theory to promote physical activity and weight control: A randomized controlled trial in women. J. Behav. Med. 33(2):110–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silva MN, Markland D, Minderico CS, Vieira PN, Castro MM, Coutinho SR, Santos TC, Matos MG, Sardinha LB, Teixeira PJ (2008) A randomized controlled trial to evaluate self-determination theory for exercise adherence and weight control: Rationale and intervention description. BMC Public Health 8(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinberg DM, Tate DF, Bennett GG, Ennett S, Samuel‐Hodge C, Ward DS (2013) The efficacy of a daily self‐weighing weight loss intervention using smart scales and e‐mail. Obesity 21(9):1789–1797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens V, Funk K, Brantley P, Erlinger T, Myers V, Champagne C, Bauck A, Samuel-Hodge C, Hollis J (2008) Design and implementation of an interactive website to support long-term maintenance of weight loss. J. Medical Internet Res. 10(1):e1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strecher VJ, Seijts GH, Kok GJ, Latham GP, Glasgow R, DeVellis B, Meertens RM, Bulger DW (1995) Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change. Health Ed. Quart. 22(2):190–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stunkard AJ, Cohen RY, Felix MR (1989) Weight loss competitions at the worksite: How they work and how well. Preventive Medicine 18(4):460–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tauer JM, Harackiewicz JM (2004) The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(6):849–861.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Mata J, Palmeira AL, Markland D (2012) Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. Internat. J. Behavioral Nutrition Physical Activity 9(1):1–3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Coutinho SR, Palmeira AL, Mata J, Vieira PN, Carraça EV, Santos TC, Sardinha LB (2010) Mediators of weight loss and weight loss maintenance in middle‐aged women. Obesity 18(4):725–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trognon A (1978) Miscellaneous asymptotic properties of ordinary least squares and maximum likelihood estimators in dynamic error components models. Ann. l’INSEE 30–31:631–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uetake K, Yang N (2018) Success breeds success: Weight loss dynamics in the presence of short-term and long-term goals. Working paper 170002, Canadian Centre for Health Economics, Toronto.Google Scholar
  • Uetake K, Yang N (2020) Inspiration from the “Biggest Loser”: Social interactions in a weight loss program. Marketing. Sci. 39(3):487–499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB (2002) Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: The Framingham experience. Arch. Internal Medicine 162(16):1867–1872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J. Econometrics 126(1):25–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Econom. J. 1(2):117–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yan LL (2018) Good intentions, bad outcomes: The effects of mismatches between social support and health outcomes in an online weight loss community. Production Oper. Management 27(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman O, Gal-Oz A (2014) Deconstructing gamification: Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous measurement, virtual rewards, and social comparison for promoting physical activity. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 18(7):1705–1719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.