How Does Intelligent System Knowledge Empowerment Yield Payoffs? Uncovering the Adaptation Mechanisms and Contingency Role of Work Experience

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1097

References

  • Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA (2005) Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. J. Appl. Psych. 90(1):94–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahearne M, Lam SK, Mathieu JE, Bolander W (2010) Why are some salespeople better at adapting to organizational change? J. Marketing 74(3):65–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmed MN, Toor AS, O’Neil K, Friedland D (2017) Cognitive computing and the future of healthcare. Accessed December 15, 2021, https://pulse.embs.org/may-2017/ cognitive-computing-and-the-future-of-healthcare/Google Scholar
  • Amey M, VanDerLinden K (2003) The use of technology. The NEA Almanac of Higher Education, 85–95. Google Scholar
  • Ang S, Van Dyne L, Koh C, Ng KY, Templer KJ, Tay C, Chandrasekar NA (2007) Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management Organ. Rev. 3(3):335–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold V, Sutton SG (1998) The theory of technology dominance: Understanding the impact of intelligent decision aids on decision makers’ judgments. Adv. Accounting Behav. Res. 1(3):175–194.Google Scholar
  • Ayala Calvo JC, García GM (2018) Hardiness as moderator of the relationship between structural and psychological empowerment on burnout in middle managers. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 91(2):362–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babalola MT, Ren S, Kobinah T, Qu YE, Garba OA, Guo L (2019) Negative workplace gossip: Its impact on customer service performance and moderating roles of trait mindfulness and forgiveness. Internat. J. Hospital Management 80:136–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baillergeau E, Duyvendak JW (2016) Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health Risk Soc. 18(7-8):407–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bala H, Venkatesh V (2016) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A, Locke EA (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):87–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(3):493–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergstein B (2019) Can AI pass the smell test? MITS Tech. Rev. 122(2):82–86.Google Scholar
  • Berk R (2019) Accuracy and fairness for juvenile justice risk assessments. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 16(1):175–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettencourt LA (1997) Customer voluntary performance: Customers as partners in service delivery. J. Retailing 73(3):383–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beus JM, Jarrett SM, Taylor AB, Wiese CW (2014) Adjusting to new work teams: Testing work experience as a multidimensional resource for newcomers. J. Organ. Behav. 35(4):489–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beyer JM, Hannah DR (2002) Building on the past: Enacting established personal identities in a new work setting. Organ. Sci. 13(6):636–652.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen DE, Waldman DA (1999) Customer-driven employee performance. Ilgen DR, Pulakos ED, eds. The Changing Nature of Performance (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 154–191.Google Scholar
  • Brown JD, Collins RL, Schmidt GW (1988) Self-esteem and direct vs. indirect forms of self-enhancement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(3):445–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter BN (1992) Personal Coping: Theory, Research, and Application (Praeger, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
  • Carr JC, Pearson AW, Vest MJ, Boyar SL (2006) Prior occupational experience, anticipatory socialization, and employee retention. J. Management 32(3):343–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cervone D, Jiwani N, Wood R (1991) Goal setting and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(2):257–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan KW, Yim CK, Lam SS (2010) Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? Evidence from professional financial services across cultures. J. Marketing 74(3):48–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(4):1165–1188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen G, Kirkman BL, Kim K, Farh C, Tangirala S (2010) When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1110–1130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen RR, Ou CX, Wang W, Peng Z, Davison RM (2020) Moving beyond the direct impact of using CRM systems on frontline employees’ service performance: The mediating role of adaptive behaviour. Inform. Systems J. 30(3):458–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):189–217.Google Scholar
  • Chreim S, Williams BE, Hinings CR (2007) Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1515–1539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad. Management Rev. 13(3):471–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daugherty PR, Wilson HJ (2018) Human+ Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Davenport TH (2018) The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH (2020) Digitizing and automating unsung heroics: The case of pathology. Accessed July 15, 2021, https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomdavenport/2020/06/23/digitizing-and-automating-unsung-heroics-the-case-of-pathology/?sh=5cdef5804773.Google Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Glaser J (2002) Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(7):107–111.Google Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Kirby J (2015) Beyond automation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(6):58–65.Google Scholar
  • Davison R, Martinsons MG (2002) Empowerment or enslavement? A case of process-based organizational change in Hong Kong. Inform. Tech. People 15(1):42–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng XN, Chi L (2013) Understanding post-adoptive behaviors in information systems use: A longitudinal analysis of system use problems in the business intelligence context. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(3):291–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng X, Joshi KD, Galliers RD (2016) The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing: Giving voice to the less powerful through value sensitive design. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(2):279–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derry SJ (1996) Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Edu. Psych. 31(3/4):163–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doherty NF, Doig G (2003) An analysis of the anticipated cultural impacts of the implementation of data warehouses. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 50(1):78–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dong MC, Fang Y, Straub DW (2017) The impact of institutional distance on the joint performance of collaborating firms: The role of adaptive interorganizational systems. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):309–331.Google Scholar
  • Downing CE, Gallaugher JM, Segars AH (2003) Information technology choices in dissimilar cultures: Enhancing empowerment. J. Global Inform. Management 11(1):20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dressel J, Farid H (2018) The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Sci. Adv. 4(1):eaao5580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durvasula S, Lysonski S, Mehta SC (2004) Technology and its CRM implications in the shipping industry. Internat. J. Tech. Management 28(1):88–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elbashir MZ, Collier PA, Sutton SG, Davern MJ, Leech SA (2013) Enhancing the business value of business intelligence: The role of shared knowledge and assimilation. J. Inform. Systems 27(2):87–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, DeLongis A (1986) Appraisal, coping, health status and psychological symptoms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(3):571–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26(4):331–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(1):51–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodwin R, Maria J, Das P, Horesh R, Segal R, Fu J, Harris C (2017) AI for fragrance design. Proc. Machine Learn. for Creativity and Design Workshop at Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  • Grover V, Teng JTC, Fiedler KD (2002) Investigating the role of information technology in building buyer-supplier relationships. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 3(7):217–245.Google Scholar
  • Grublješič T, Jaklič J (2015) Conceptualization of the business intelligence extended use model. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 55(3):72–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair JF, Black W, Anderson RE, Tatham R (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings, 6th ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Han YM, Farn CK (2013) A study on the effects of empowerment and habit on continuance usage of pervasive business intelligence systems. Proc. 46th Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System Sci.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monograph. 76(4):408–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 50(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Herold DM, Fedor DB, Caldwell SD (2007) Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees’ commitment to change. J. Appl. Psych. 92(4):942–951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill NS, Kang JH, Seo MG (2014) The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and electronic communication on employee psychological empowerment and work outcomes. Leadership Quart. 25(4):772–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobfoll SE (2001) The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl. Psych. 50(3):337–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg P (2019) Artificial intelligence: HR friend or foe? Strategic HR Rev. 18(2):47–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homburg C, Wieseke J, Hoyer WD (2009) Social identity and the service-profit chain. J. Marketing 73(2):38–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang MH, Rust RT (2018) Artificial intelligence in service. J. Service Res. 21(2):155–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang X, Iun J, Liu A, Gong Y (2010) Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. J. Organ. Behav. 31(1):122–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1332–1356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Jarrahi MH (2018) Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Bus. Horizons 61(4):577–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E, Sundaram S, Chin W (2002) Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. J. Personality Selling Sales Management 22(3):145–156.Google Scholar
  • Kark R, Shamir B, Chen G (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. J. Appl. Psych. 88(2):246–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keith N, Frese M (2005) Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):677–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim HW, Gupta S (2014) A user empowerment approach to information systems infusion. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 61(4):656–668.Google Scholar
  • Kleinberg J, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):237–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kline RB (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. (Guildford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ko DG, Dennis AR (2011) Profiting from knowledge management: The impact of time and experience. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):134–152.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kolodner JL (1983) Toward an understanding of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert. Internat. J. Man Machine Stud. 19(5):497–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to IT implementation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(3):461–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laschinger HKS, Havens DS (1997) The effect of workplace empowerment on staff nurses’ occupational mental health and work effectiveness. J. Nursing Admin. 27(6):42–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law KS, Wong CS, Mobley WM (1998) Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):741–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS (1993) Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine 55:234–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Li X, Hsieh JJPA, Rai A (2013) Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):659–682.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liao H, Chuang A (2004) A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Acad. Management J. 47(1):41–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Licklider JC (1960) Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Human Factors Electronics 1(1):4–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrow RT (2000) An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3):407–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyytinen K, Grover V (2017) Management misinformation systems: A time to revisit? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(3):206–230.Google Scholar
  • Mackay JM, Lamb CW Jr (1991) Training needs of novices and experts with referent experience and task domain knowledge. Inform. Management 20(3):183–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major B, Richards MC, Cooper ML, Cozzarelli C, Zubek J (1998) Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: An integrative model of adjustment to abortion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):735–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mao JY, Benbasat I (2000) The use of explanations in knowledge-based systems: Cognitive perspectives and a process-tracing analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(2):153–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marinova D, de Ruyter K, Huang MH, Meuter ML, Challagalla G (2017) Getting smart: Learning from technology-empowered frontline interactions. J. Service Res. 20(1):29–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus LM (2001) Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(1):57–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. 34(5):583–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maynard MT, Luciano MM, D’Innocenzo L, Mathieu JE, Dean MD (2014) Modeling time-lagged reciprocal psychological empowerment-performance relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 99(6):1244–1253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCrae RR (1989) Age differences and changes in the use of coping mechanisms. J. Gerontology 44(6):161–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moos RH, Holahan CJ (2007) Adaptive tasks and methods of coping with illness and disability. Martz E, Livneh H eds. Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability (Springer, Boston, MA), 107–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. 126(2):247–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson KM, Nadkarni S, Narayanan VK, Ghods M (2000) Understanding software operations support expertise: A revealed causal mapping approach. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(3):475–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pavlou PA (2018) Internet of things: Will humans be replaced or augmented? NIM Marketing Intelligence Rev. 10(2):42–47.Google Scholar
  • Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in IS research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(4):623–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piliavin JA, Grube JA, Callero PL (2002) Role as resource for action in public service. J. Soc. Issues 58(3):469–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinsonneault A, Rivard S (1998) Information technology and the nature of managerial work: From the productivity paradox to the Icarus paradox? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22(3):287–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching cost, and inertia on new system acceptance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(1):21–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 37(1):221–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB, eds. The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 13–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quiñones MA, Ford JK, Teachout MS (1995) The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta‐analytic review. Personality Psych. 48(4):887–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Constantinides P, Sarker S (2019) Editor’s comments: Next generation digital platform toward human AI hybrids. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(1):iii–ix.Google Scholar
  • Raisch S, Krakowski S (2020) Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):192–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reber AS (1993) Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riley T (2018) Get ready, this year your next job interview may be with an AI robot. CBC (March 13), Accessed May 10, 2019, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/ai-job-recruiting-tools-offered-by-hirevue-mya-other-start-ups.html.Google Scholar
  • Rizzo JR, House RJ, Lirtzman SI (1970) Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 15(2):150–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saga VL, Zmud RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Levine L, ed. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh), 67–86.Google Scholar
  • Salomon G (1984) Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. J. Edu. Psych. 76(4):647–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, Outerbridge AN (1986) Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3):432–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider B, Hanges PJ, Goldstein HW, Braverman EP (1994) Do customer service perceptions generalize? The case of student and chair ratings of faculty effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 79(5):685–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuetz S, Venkatesh V (2020) The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(2):460–482.Google Scholar
  • Schwarz AH (2003) Defining information technology acceptance: A human-centered, management-oriented perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  • Schwarzer R, Greenglass E (1999) Teacher burnout from a social-cognitive perspective: A theoretical position paper. Vandenberghe R, Hubermann M, eds. Understanding and Preventing Teacher Burnout: A Sourcebook of International Research and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 238–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Silver SR, Randolph WA (2004) Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 47(3):332–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Wang G, Courtright SH (2011) Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 96(5):981–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanteau J (1988) Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 68(1-3):289–304.Google Scholar
  • Smidts A, Pruyn ATH, Van Riel CB (2001) The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1051–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snipes RL, Oswald SL, LaTour M, Armenakis AA (2005) The effects of specific job satisfaction facets on customer perceptions of service quality: An employee-level analysis. J. Bus. Res. 58(10):1330–1339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Speier C, Venkatesh V (2002) The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. J. Marketing 66(3):98–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1996) Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Acad. Management J. 39(2):483–504. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (2008) Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. Barling J, Cooper CL, eds. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 54–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, Calo R, Etzioni O, Hager G, Hirschberg J, et al. (2016) Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. One hundred year study on artificial intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 study panel. Report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Stryker S, Burke PJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(4):284–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundaram S, Schwarz A, Jones E, Chin WW (2007) Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):101–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H (2005) Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(2):311–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of IT synergies in multibusiness firms. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(1):57–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H, Uysal VB (2011) Cross-business information technology integration and acquirer value creation in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):703–720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Stanton AL (2007) Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu. Rev. Clinical Psych. 3:377–401.Google Scholar
  • Taylor AB, MacKinnon DP, Tein JY (2008) Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S, Kemeny ME, Reed GM, Bower JE, Gruenewald TL (2000) Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. Am. Psych. 55(1):99–109.Google Scholar
  • Terry DJ, Callan VJ (2000) Employee adjustment to an organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Dewe P, Leiter M, Cox T, eds. Coping, Health and Organizations (Taylor and Francis, London), 259–276.Google Scholar
  • Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):666–681.Google Scholar
  • Tippins MJ, Sohi RS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. 24(8):745–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Troyer L, Mueller CW, Osinsky PI (2000) Who’s the boss? A role-theoretic analysis of customer work. Work Occupation 27(3):406–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai HT, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):143–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Heuvel M (2013) Adaptation to organizational change: The role of meaning-making and other psychological resources. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Van Overschelde JP, Healy AF (2001) Learning of nondomain facts in high-and low-knowledge domains. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 27(5):1160–1171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vardaman JM, Amis JM, Dyson BP, Wright PM, Van de Graaff Randolph R (2012) Interpreting change as controllable: The role of network centrality and self-efficacy. Human Relations 65(7):835–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(3):425–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N (1990) Performance implications of strategic coalignment. J. Management Stud. 27(1):19–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G (2018) Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Acad. Management Discovery 4(4):404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang P (2008) What do you mean by “AI”? Proc. First AGI Conf.Google Scholar
  • Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR (2018) Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(4):114–123. Google Scholar
  • Wixom BH, Yen B, Relich M (2013) Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Quart. Executive 12(2):111–123.Google Scholar
  • Wong CS, Law KS, Huang GH (2008) On the importance of conducting construct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing. J. Management 34(4):744–764.Google Scholar
  • Wood W, Neal DT (2007) A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psych. Rev. 114(4):843–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Choi B, Guo X, Chang KTT (2017) Understanding user adaptation toward a new IT system in organizations: A social network perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(11):787–813.Google Scholar
  • Zhang X, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Management J. 53(1):107–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang AY, Song LJ, Tsui AS, Fu PP (2014) Employee responses to employment-relationship practices: The role of psychological empowerment and traditionality. J. Organ. Behav. 35(6):809–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman BJ (2000) Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contempory Edu. Psych. 25(1):82–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.