Do “Likes” in a Brand Community Always Make You Buy More?

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(2):495–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Algesheimer R, Borle S, Dholakia UM, Singh SS (2010) The impact of customer community participation on customer behaviors: An empirical investigation. Marketing Sci. 29(4):756–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Elder TE, Taber CR (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113(1):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery J, Steenburgh TJ, Deighton J, Caravella M (2012) Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Marketing 76(3):96–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Benner MJ, Qiu L (2019) Nurturing online communities: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 43(2):425–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2018) Monetizing freemium communities: Does paying for premium increase social engagement? MIS Quart. 42(3):719–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Gill S, Reichman S (2021) Stuck online: When online engagement gets in the way of offline sales. MIS Quart. 45(2):755–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé JP, Sanders RE (2020) Consumer misinformation and the brand premium: A private label blind taste test. Marketing Sci. 39(2):382–406.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Holbrook MB (2001) The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. J. Marketing 65(2):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheikh-Ammar M, Barki H (2016) The influence of social presence, social exchange and feedback features on SNS continuous use: The Facebook context. J. Organ. End User Comput. 28(2):33–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung F, Lucas RE (2016) Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(2):332–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deleersnyder B, Geyskens I, Gielens K, Dekimpe MG (2002) How cannibalistic is the internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(4):337–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox J, Moreland JJ (2015) The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput. Human Behav. 45:168–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yao Y (2011) Using transaction prices to re-examine price dispersion in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):269–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons FX, Buunk BP (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(1):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill M, Sridhar S, Grewal R (2017) Return on engagement initiatives: A study of a business-to-business mobile app. J. Marketing 81(4):45–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosser TJ, Obstfeld D, Choi EW, Woehler M, Lopez-Kidwell V, Labianca G, Borgatti SP (2018) A sociopolitical perspective on employee innovativeness and job performance: The role of political skill and network structure. Organ. Sci. 29(4):612–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Gu X, Kannan P (2021) The dark side of mobile app adoption: Examining the impact on customers’ multichannel purchase. J. Marketing Res. 58(2):246–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmeling CM, Moffett JW, Arnold MJ, Carlson BD (2017) Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 45(3):312–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes RA, Carr CT, Wohn DY (2016) One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media 60(1):171–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernández-Ortega BI, Stanko MA, Rishika R, Molina-Castillo FJ, Franco J (2022) Brand-generated social media content and its differential impact on loyalty program members. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 50(5):1071–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lim KH, Lin Z (2020) Leveraging the numerosity effect to influence perceived expensiveness of virtual items. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):93–114.Link, Google Scholar
• John LK, Emrich O, Gupta S, Norton MI (2017) Does “liking” lead to loving? The impact of joining a brand’s social network on marketing outcomes. J. Marketing Res. 54(1):144–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J, Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2019) Love unshackled: Identifying the effect of mobile app adoption in online dating. MIS Quart. 43(1):47–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS (2011) Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horizons 54(3):241–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Mehra A, Kumar S (2019) Why do stores drive online sales? Evidence of underlying mechanisms from a multichannel retailer. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):319–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacey R, Kennett-Hensel PA, Manolis C (2015) Is corporate social responsibility a motivator or hygiene factor? Insights into its bivalent nature. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 43(3):315–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SY (2014) How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites? The case of Facebook. Comput. Human Behav. 32:253–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liadeli G, Francesca S, Peeter WJV (2023) A meta-analysis of the effects of brands’ owned social media on social media engagement and sales. J. Marketing 87(3):406–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindström B, Bellander M, Schultner DT, Chang A, Tobler PN, Amodio DM (2021) A computational reward learning account of social media engagement. Nat. Comm. 12(1):1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):42–67.Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Packard G, Pattabhiramaiah A (2015) Social dollars: The economic impact of customer participation in a firm-sponsored online customer community. Marketing Sci. 34(3):367–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Marzocchi G, Morandin G, Bergami M (2013) Brand communities: Loyal to the community or the brand? Eur. J. Marketing 47(1/2):93–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlexander JH, Schouten JW, Koenig HF (2002) Building brand community. J. Marketing 66(1):38–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mochon D, Johnson K, Schwartz J, Ariely D (2017) What are likes worth? A Facebook page field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 54(2):306–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muniz AM, O’Guinn TC (2001) Brand community. J. Consumer Res. 27(4):412–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quart. 37(2):591–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozer GT, Greenwood BN, Gopal A (2023) Digital multisided platforms and women’s health: An empirical analysis of peer-to-peer lending and abortion rates. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):223–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Park CW, MacInnis DJ, Priester J, Eisingerich AB, Iacobucci D (2010) Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. J. Marketing 74(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park E, Rishika R, Janakiraman R, Houston MB, Yoo B (2018) Social dollars in online communities: The effect of product, user, and network characteristics. J. Marketing 82(1):93–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Harper FM, Drenner S, Terveen L, Kiesler S, Riedl J, Kraut RE (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quart. 36(3):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Hastall MR, Köcher S, Meske C, Heinrich T, Labrenz F, Ocklenburg S (2019) “Likes” as social rewards: Their role in online social comparison and decisions to like other people’s selfies. Comput. Human Behav. 92:76–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1990) Formal mode of statistical inference for causal effects. J. Statist. Planning Inference 25(3):279–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheier MF, Carver CS (1985) The self‐consciousness scale: A revised version for use with general populations. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 15(8):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman LE, Payton AA, Hernandez LM, Greenfield PM, Dapretto M (2016) The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psych. Sci. 27(7):1027–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SA, Sinha RK (2008) Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. J. Marketing 72(6):65–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobin SJ, Vanman EJ, Verreynne M, Saeri AK (2015) Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and ostracism. Soc. Influence 10(1):31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhagen T, Van Dolen W (2009) Online purchase intentions: A multi-channel store image perspective. Inform. Management 46(2):77–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel EA, Rose JP, Okdie BM, Eckles K, Franz B (2015) Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personality Individual Differences 86:249–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weltevreden JW (2007) Substitution or complementarity? How the internet changes city centre shopping. J. Retailing Consumer Services 14(3):192–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesel T, Pauwels K, Arts J (2011) Practice prize paper—Marketing’s profit impact: Quantifying online and 0ff-line funnel progression. Marketing Sci. 30(4):604–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Huang L, Zhao JL (2019) Operationalizing regulatory focus in the digital age: Evidence from an e-commerce context. MIS Quart. 43(3):745–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu X, Yao Z, Teo TS (2020) Moral obligation in online social interaction: Clicking the “like” button. Inform. Management 57(7):103249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zell AL, Moeller L (2018) Are you happy for me … on Facebook? The potential importance of “likes” and comments. Comput. Human Behav. 78:26–33.Crossref, Google Scholar