Emotionality in Political Social Media Communications: The Moderating Role of Audience Diversity

References

• Abramowitz AI, Webster SW (2018) Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psych. 39(S1):119–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adamopoulos P, Ghose A, Todri V (2018) The impact of user personality traits on word of mouth: Text-mining social media platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):612–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Algesheimer R, Dholakia UM, Herrmann A (2005) The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. J. Marketing 69(3):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arguello J, Butler BS, Joyce E, Kraut R, Ling KS, Rose C, Wang X (2006) Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Grinter R, Rodden T, Aoki P, Cutrell E, Jeffries R, Olson G, eds. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 959–968.Google Scholar
• Bail CA, Argyle LP, Brown TW, Bumpus JP, Chen H, Fallin Hunzaker MB, Lee J, Mann M, Merhout F, Volfovsky A (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(37):9216–9221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Benner MJ, Qiu L (2019) Nurturing online communities: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 43(2):425–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barger V, Peltier JW, Schultz DE (2016) Social media and consumer engagement: A review and research agenda. J. Res. Interactive Marketing 10(4):268–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bender T (1978) Community and Social Change in America (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bennett WL (2012) The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 644(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2011) Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psych. Sci. 22(7):891–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Moe WW, Schweidel D (2023) What holds attention? Linguistic drivers of engagement. J. Marketing 87(5):793–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Sherman G, Ungar L (2020) TextAnalyzer. Retrieved http://textanalyzer.org.Google Scholar
• Bermingham A, Smeaton A (2011) On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. Bandyopadhyay S, Okumura M, eds. Proc. Workshop Sentiment Analysis Where AI Meets Psych. SAAIP 2011 (Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Chiang Mai, Thailand), 2–10.Google Scholar
• Berry LL (1995) Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 23(Fall):236–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond BJ (2018) Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psych. 21(3):457–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond CF, Jason Thomas B, Paulson RM (2004) Maintaining lies: The multiple-audience problem. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 40(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley MM, Greenwald MK, Petry MC, Lang PJ (1992) Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. J. Exp. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 18(2):379–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catapano R, Tormala Z (2021) Do I support that it’s good or oppose that it’s bad? The effect of support-oppose framing on attitude sharing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 121(1):23–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z (2017) Social acceptance and word of mouth: How the motive to belong leads to divergent WOM with strangers and friends. J. Consumer Res. 44(3):613–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, De P, Hu YJ (2015) IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists’ activities and music sales. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):513–531.Link, Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, De Francisci Morales G, Galeazzi A, Starnini M (2021) The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(9):e2023301118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colicev A, Kumar A, O’Connor P (2019) Modeling the relationship between firm and user generated content and the stages of the marketing funnel. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 36(1):100–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conover M, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, Goncalves B, Menczer F, Flammini A (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 5(1):89–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowen AS, Keltner D (2017) Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(38):E7900–E7909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, McHugh PJ, Zubillaga JI (2010) How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quart. Executive 9(4):243–259.Google Scholar
• Daniel S, Agarwal R, Stewart K (2013) The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):312–333.Link, Google Scholar
• De Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang P (2017) Effects of traditional advertising and social messages on brand-building metrics and customer acquisition. J. Marketing 81(5):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubois D, Bonezzi A, De Angelis M (2016) Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. J. Marketing Res. 53(5):712–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyal K, Dailey RM (2012) Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Comm. Soc. 15(5):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fossen BL, Kim D, Schweidel DA, Thomadsen R (2022) The role of slant and message consistency in political advertising effectiveness: Evidence from the 2016 presidential election. Quant. Marketing Econom. 20(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler EF, Franz MM, Martin GJ, Peskowitz Z, Ridout TN (2021) Political advertising online and offline. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 115(1):130–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Gross JJ (2002) Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 39(3):281–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habibi M, Laroche M, Richard MO (2014) The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Comput. Human Behav. 37(August):152–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):369–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Hars A, Ou S (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electr. Commerce 6(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasell A, Weeks B (2016) Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Comm. Res. 42(4):641–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He S, Rui H, Whinston AB (2018) Social media strategies in product-harm crises. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):362–380.Link, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Bell C, Sternberg E (2001) Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 81(6):1028–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimbach I, Hinz O (2016) The impact of content sentiment and emotionality on content virality. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 33(3):695–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herhausen D, Ludwig S, Grewal D, Wulf J, Schoegel M (2019) Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. J. Marketing 83(3):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 32(7):1159–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Fodor M (2010) Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(1):41–49.Google Scholar
• Holpuch A (2023) Behind the backlash against Bud Light. New York Times (November 21), https://www.nytimes.com/article/bud-light-boycott.html.Google Scholar
• Huang N, Mojumder P, Sun T, Lv J, Golden JM (2021) Not registered? Please sign up first: A randomized field experiment on the ex ante registration request. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):914–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Hutto CJ, Yardi S, Gilbert E (2013) A longitudinal study of follow predictors on Twitter. Mackay WE, ed. Proc. Sigchi Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 821–830.Google Scholar
• Iyengar S, Sood G, Lelkes Y (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quart. 76(3):405–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jagarlamudi J, Daum H III, Udupa R (2012) Incorporating lexical priors into topic models. Daelemans W, ed. Proc. 13th Conf. Eur. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA).Google Scholar
• Jahanbakhsh K, Moon Y (2014) The predictive power of social media: On the predictability of us presidential elections using Twitter. Preprint, submitted July 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0622.Google Scholar
• Jung J, Ada Wang S, Wattal S (2024) Commercializing social media? How showrooms on social media fan pages influence customer behavior. MIS Quart. 48(2):521–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keib K, Espina C, Lee Y-I, Wojdynski BW, Choi D, Bang H (2017) Picture this: The influence of emotionally valenced images, on attention, selection, and sharing of social media news. Media Psych. 21(2):202–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kissler J, Herbert C, Peyk P, Junghofer M (2007) Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psych. Sci. 18(6):475–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivran-Swaine F, Naaman M (2011) Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams. Hinds P, Tang JC, Wang J, Bardram J, Ducheneaut N, eds. CSCW ‘11: Proc. ACM 2011 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 379–382.Google Scholar
• Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(24):8788–8790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Resnick P (2016) Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lang A (2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J. Comm. 50(1):46–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonytė JAT, Zhu X (2022) Frontiers: Spilling the beans on political consumerism: Do social media boycotts and buycotts translate to real sales impact? Marketing Sci. 42(1):11–25.Link, Google Scholar
• Ling K, Beenen G, Ludford P, Wang X, Chang K, Li X, Cosley D, et al. (2005) Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. J. Comput. Med. Comm. 10(4):JCMC10411.Google Scholar
• Liu C-W, Gao G(G), Agarwal R (2019) Unraveling the “social” in social norms: The conditioning effect of user connectivity. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1272–1295.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy K, Saxton GD (2012) Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. J. Comput. Med. Comm. 17(3):337–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Wu J, Tan Y, Chen J (2022) Microblogging replies and opinion polarization: A natural experiment. MIS Quart. 46(4):1901–1937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luebke SM, Engelmann I (2023) Perceiving politicians as true to themselves: Development and validation of the perceived political authenticity scale. PLoS One 18(5):e0285344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mascaro L, Fields G (2024) America’s toxic political climate faces class to ‘tone it down’ after assassination attempt on Trump. Associated Press (July 14), https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-shooting-violent-rhetoric-1e4b414279af1872b07ac40385678b3e.Google Scholar
• McAlexander JH, Schouten JW, Koenig HF (2002) Building brand community. J. Marketing 66(1):38–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrill JB, Oremus W (2021) Five points for anger, one for ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation. The Washington Post (October 26), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/26/facebook-angry-emoji-algorithm/.Google Scholar
• Mohammed S (2018) Obtaining reliable human ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance for 20,000 English words. Proc. 56th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, Volume 1: Long Papers (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 174–184.Google Scholar
• Muñiz AM Jr, O’Guinn T (2001) Brand community. J. Consumer Res. 27(4):412–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muñiz AM Jr, Schau HJ (2007) Vigilante marketing and consumer-created communications. J. Advertising 36(3):35–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson-Field K, Riebe E, Newstead K (2013) The emotions that drive viral video. Australasian Marketing J. 21(4):205–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nian T, Hu Y, Chen C (2021) Examining the impact of television-program-induced emotions on online word-of-mouth toward television advertising. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):605–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Goh K-Y, Phan TQ (2023) Are you what you tweet? The impact of sentiment on digital news consumption and social media sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):111–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Park S, Gupta S (2012) Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Sci. 31(4):567–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Papies D, Ebbes P, van Heerde HJ (2017) Addressing endogeneity in marketing models. Leeflang PSH, Wieringa JE, Bijmolt THA, Pauwels KH, eds. Advanced Methods for Modeling Markets (Springer, New York), 581–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng J, Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Iyengar R (2018) Network overlap and content sharing on social media platforms. J. Marketing Res. 55(4):571–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters K, Kashima Y (2007) From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(5):780–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrova M, Sen A, Yildirim P (2021) Social media and political contributions: The impact of new technology on political competition. Management Sci. 67(5):2997–3021.Link, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2018) Voter enthusiasm at record high in nationalized midterm environment. Accessed May 1, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/09/26/voter-enthusiasm-at-record-high-in-nationalized-midterm-environment/#top-issues-for-voters-supreme-court-health-care-economy.Google Scholar
• Phua J, Jin SV, Kim JJ (2017) Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telemat. Informatics 34(1):412–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quercia D, Ellis J, Capra L, Crowcroft J (2011) In the mood for being influential on Twitter. IEEE Third Internat. Conf. Privacy Security Risk Trust 2011 IEEE Third Internat. Conf. Social Comput. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ), 307–314.Google Scholar
• Rimé B (2009) Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Rev. 1(1):60–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert LP Jr, Dennis AR, Ahuja MK (2018) Differences are different: Examining the effects of communication media on the impacts of racial and gender diversity in decision-making teams. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):525–545.Link, Google Scholar
• Rocklage M, Rucker D, Nordgren L (2018) The evaluative lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behav. Res. Methods 50(4):1327–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roose K, Isaac M (2021) Facebook dials down the politics for users. New York Times (February 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/technology/facebook-reduces-politics-feeds.html.Google Scholar
• Rossi F, Rubera G (2021) Measuring competition for attention in social media: National Women’s Soccer League players on Twitter. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1147–1168.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Roy D, Mishra A, Sinha KK (2021) Taxing the taxpayers: An empirical investigation of the drivers of baseline changes in U.S. federal government technology programs. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):370–391.Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Royzman EB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(4):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell A (2018) U.S. senators on Twitter: Asymmetric party rhetoric in 140 characters. Amer. Politics Res. 46(4):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust R, Rand W, Huang MH, Stephen A, Brooks G, Chabuk T (2021) Real-time brand reputation tracking using social media. J. Marketing 85(4):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schau HJ, Muñiz AM, Arnould EJ (2009) How brand community practices create value. J. Marketing 73(5):30–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Netzer O, Stahl F (2023) Frontiers: Polarized America: From political polarization to preference polarization. Marketing Sci. 42(1):48–6.Link, Google Scholar
• Singhal A (2001) Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 24(4):35–43.Google Scholar
• Srivastava V, Kalro AD (2019) Enhancing the helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of latent (content) factors. J. Interactive Marketing 48(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L (2013) Emotions and information diffusion in social media-sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):217–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steininger D, Mikalef P, Pateli A, Ortiz de Guinea A (2022) Dynamic capabilities in information systems research: A critical review, synthesis of current knowledge, & recommendations for future research. J. Assn. Inform. Systems 23(2):447–490.Google Scholar
• Swani K, Labrecque LI (2020) Like, comment, or share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices. Marketing Lett. 31(2):279–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1978) Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. Tajfel H, ed. Differentiation Between Social Groups (Academic Press, Cambridge, UK), 61–76.Google Scholar
• Tan X, Lu Y, Tan Y (2021) The impact of subscription reciprocity on charitable content creation and sharing: Evidence from Twitter on Giving Tuesday. MIS Quart. 45(2):535–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Chen L (2020) An empirical study of brand microblog users’ unfollowing motivations: The perspective of push-pull-mooring model. Internat. J. Inform. Management 52(June):102066.Google Scholar
• Tellis G, MacInnis D, Tirunillai S, Zhang Y (2019) What drives virality (sharing) of online digital content? The critical role of information, emotion, & brand prominence. J. Marketing 83(4):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Chintagunta PK (2022) Invited commentary—How support for Black Lives Matter impacts consumer responses on social media. Marketing Sci. 41(6):1045–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomson M (2006) Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. J. Marketing 70(3):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SA, Sinha RK (2008) Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. J. Marketing 72(6):65–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai H-T, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quart. 38(1):143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utz S (2009) The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. J. Comput. Med. Comm. 14(2):221–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentino NA, Brader T, Groenendyk EW, Gregorowicz K, Hutchings VL (2011) Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. J. Politics 73(1):156–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valenzuela S, Piña M, Ramírez J (2017) Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. J. Comm. 67(5):803–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viegas F, Alvim MS, Canuto S, Rosa T, Gonçalves MA, Rocha L (2020) Exploiting semantic relationships for unsupervised expansion of sentiment lexicons. Inform. Systems 94(December):101606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true & false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wahlström M, Törnberg A, Ekbrand H (2021) Dynamics of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric in far-right social media. New Media Soc. 23(11):3290–3311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker J, Wasserman S, Wellman B (1994) Statistical models for social support networks. Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J, eds. Advances in Social Network Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang SA, Greenwood BN, Pavlou PA (2020) Tempting fate: Social media posts, unfollowing, and long-term sales. MIS Quart. 44(4):2521–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lewis M, Schweidel DA (2018) A border strategy analysis of ad source and message tone in senatorial campaigns. Marketing Sci. 37(3):333–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shaojun Qin M, Luo X, Kou Y (2022) Frontiers: How support for Black Lives Matter impacts consumer responses on social media. Marketing Sci. 41(6):1029–1044.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber C (2013) Emotions, campaigns, & political participation. Political Res. Quart. 66(2):414–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster SW (2020) American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster SW, Connors EC, Sinclair B (2022) The social consequences of political anger. J. Politics 84(3):1292–1305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weeks B (2015) Emotions, partisanship, & misperceptions: How anger & anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. J. Comm. 65(4):699–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weng J, Lim E-P, Jiang J, He Q (2010) Twitterrank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Davison BD, Suel T, Craswell N, Liu B, eds. Proc. Third ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 261–270.Google Scholar
• Wies S, Bleier A, Edeling A (2023) Finding goldilocks influencers: How follower count drives social media engagement. J. Marketing 87(3):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ren Y, Adomavicius G (2019) Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):839–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu J (2014) We look for social, not promotion: Brand post strategy, consumer emotions, and engagement. GSTF Internat. J. Media Comm. 1(2):28–37.Google Scholar
• Zhu YQ, Hsiao B (2021) What attracts followers? Exploring factors contributing to brand Twitter follower counts. J. Org. End User Comput. 33(1):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhuravskaya E, Petrova M, Enikolopov R (2020) Political effects of the internet and social media. Annu. Rev. Econom. 12(Aug):415–438.Crossref, Google Scholar