Lost in the Crowd: How Group Size and Content Moderation Shape User Engagement in Live Streaming

References

• Adamczyk PD, Bailey BP (2004) If not now, when?: The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Human Factors in Computing Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 271–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arguello J, Butler BS, Joyce E, Kraut RE, Ling KS, Rosé CP, Wang X (2006) Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Human Factors in Computing Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 959–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baek J, Shore J (2020) Forum size and content contribution per person: A field experiment. Management Sci. 66(12):5906–5924.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT, Wang G (2020) A note on the impact of daily deals on local retailers’ online reputation: Mediation effects of the consumer experience. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1037–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair A (2011) Information overload’s 2,300-year-old history. Retrieved March 1, 2025, https://hbr.org/2011/03/information-overloads-2300-yea.Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Bond CF, Titus LJ (1983) Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol. Bull. 94(2):265–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Wohn DY (2022) Coordination and collaboration: How do volunteer moderators work as a team in live streaming communities? Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekharan E, Samory M, Jhaver S, Charvat H, Bruckman A, Lampe C, Eisenstein J, et al. (2018) The Internet’s hidden rules: An empirical study of Reddit norm violations at micro, meso, and macro scales. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interaction (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–25.Google Scholar
• Chen CP, Lin YC (2018) What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics Informatics 35(1):293–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Peterson JC, Griffiths TL (2017) Evaluating vector-space models of analogy. Preprint, submitted May 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04416.Google Scholar
• Chen YC, Shang RA, Kao CY (2009) The effects of information overload on consumers’ subjective state towards buying decision in the internet shopping environment. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 8(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Bernstein M, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Leskovec J (2017) Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1217–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chmiel A, Sienkiewicz J, Thelwall M, Paltoglou G, Buckley K, Kappas A, Hołyst JA (2011) Collective emotions online and their influence on community life. PLoS One 6(7):e22207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christanto R, Miaou SG, Lin TL (2011) Reducing perceptual discontinuity in peer-to-peer live video streaming based on frame loss visibility information. Proc. Internat. Conf. Electrical Engrg. Informatics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2018) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech. 33(2):124–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean B (2021) How many users does clubhouse have? 40+ clubhouse stats (2021). Accessed April 18, 2021, https://backlinko.com/clubhouse-users.Google Scholar
• Dean B (2024) X (Twitter) statistics: How many people use X? (2024). Accessed July 9, 2024, https://backlinko.com/twitter-users.Google Scholar
• Ethayarajh K, Duvenaud D, Hirst G (2018) Towards understanding linear word analogies. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04882.Google Scholar
• Foltz PW, Kintsch W, Landauer TK (1998) The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2–3):285–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford C, Gardner D, Horgan LE, Liu C, Tsaasan AM, Nardi B, Rickman J (2017) Chat speed op pogchamp: Practices of coherence in massive twitch chat. Proc. CHI Conf. Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 858–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosz BJ, Weinstein S, Joshi AK (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Comput. Linguist. 21(2):203–225.Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Hou F, Li B, Phang CW, Chong AYL (2022) What influences the purchase of virtual gifts in live streaming in China? A cultural context-sensitive model. Inform. Systems J. 32(3):653–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo C, Kim TH, Susarla A, Sambamurthy V (2020) Understanding content contribution behavior in a geosegmented mobile virtual community: The context of Waze. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1398–1420.Link, Google Scholar
• Hamilton WA, Garretson O, Kerne A (2014) Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1315–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• He Q, Hong Y, Raghu TS (2024) Platform governance with algorithm-based content moderation: An empirical study on Reddit. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print August 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0036.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Peng J, Burtch G, Huang N (2021) Just DM me (politely): Direct messaging, politeness, and hiring outcomes in online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):786–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Talamadupula K, Kambhampati S (2013) Dude, srsly?: The Surprisingly formal nature of Twitter’s language. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media, vol. 7, 244–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, He Y, Hong Y (2022) Managing congestion in a matching market via demand information disclosure. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1196–1220.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones Q, Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2004) Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):194–211.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspective 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaytoue M, Silva A, Cerf L, Meira W, Raïssi C (2012) Watch me playing, I am a professional. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Companion World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1181–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer AD, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(24):8788–8790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuang L, Huang N, Hong Y, Yan Z (2019) Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: Evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):289–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Mahdian M, McGlohon M (2010) Dynamics of conversations. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 553–562.Google Scholar
• Kusner MJ, Sun Y, Kolkin NI, Weinberger KQ (2015) From word embeddings to document distances. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 37 (PMLR, New York), 957–966.Google Scholar
• Levy O, Goldberg Y (2014) Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 27:2177–2185.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Guo Y (2021) Virtual gifting and danmaku: What motivates people to interact in game live streaming? Telematics Informatics 62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Grahl J, Hinz O (2022) How do recommender systems lead to consumer purchases? A causal mediation analysis of a field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):620–637.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, Levy O, et al. (2019) RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. Preprint, submitted July 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692.Google Scholar
• Lu S, Yao D, Chen X, Grewal R (2021) Do larger audiences generate greater revenues under pay what you want? Evidence from a live streaming platform. Marketing Sci. 40(5):964–984.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyu K, Kim H (2016) Sentiment analysis using word polarity of social media. Wireless Personal Comm. 89(3):941–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matias JN (2019) The civic labor of volunteer moderators online. Soc. Media Soc. 5(2).Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Mohan S, Guha A, Harris M, Popowich F, Schuster A, Priebe C (2017) The impact of toxic language on the health of Reddit communities. Mouhoub M, Langlais P, eds. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10233 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 51–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muhammad A, Wiratunga N, Lothian R (2016) Contextual sentiment analysis for social media genres. Knowledge-Based Systems 108:92–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD (2014) GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics), 1532–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pessoa L (2008) On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9(2):148–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Benbasat I (2005) Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: The effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 19(1):75–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Tang Q, Whinston AB (2016) Two formulas for success in social media: Learning and network effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruckenstein M, Turunen LLM (2020) Re-humanizing the platform: Content moderators and the logic of care. New Media Soc. 22(6):1026–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salehabadi N, Groggel A, Singhal M, Roy SS, Nilizadeh S (2022) User engagement and the toxicity of tweets. Preprint, submitted November 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03856.Google Scholar
• Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inform. Processing Management 24(5):513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schick AG, Gordon LA, Haka S (1990) Information overload: A temporal approach. Accounting Organ. Soc. 15(3):199–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seering J, Kairam SR (2024) Who moderates on Twitch and what do they do? Quantifying practices in community moderation on Twitch. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interactions (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 7.Google Scholar
• Seering J, Flores JP, Savage S, Hammer J (2018) The social roles of bots: Situating bots in discussions in online communities. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interactions (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–29.Google Scholar
• Seering J, Wang T, Yoon J, Kaufman G (2019) Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media Soc. 21(7):1417–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shewale R (2024) Twitch statistics in 2024 (users, revenue & streamers). Accessed July 9, 2024, https://www.demandsage.com/twitch-users/.Google Scholar
• Simpson CW, Prusak L (1995) Troubles with information overload: Moving from quantity to quality in information provision. Internat. J. Inform. Management 15(6):413–425.Google Scholar
• Singha J, Das K (2013) Indian Sign Language recognition using Eigen value weighted Euclidean distance based classification technique. Internat. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(2).Google Scholar
• Sjöblom M, Hamari J (2016) Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Comput. Human Behav. 75:985–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Speier C, Valacich JS, Vessey I (1999) The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sci. 30(2):337–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan KB, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Lee L, Tan C (2019) Content removal as a moderation strategy: Compliance and other outcomes in the changemyview community. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interactions (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen B (2020) The lockdown live-streaming numbers are out, and they’re huge. Accessed October 10, 2020, https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/13/21257227/coronavirus-streamelements-arsenalgg-twitch-youtube-livestream-numbers.Google Scholar
• Tan X, Wang Y, Tan Y (2019) Impact of live chat on purchase in electronic markets: The moderating role of information cues. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1248–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• TwitchTracker (2024) Twitch watch time statistics. Accessed July 9, 2024, https://twitchtracker.com/statistics/watch-time.Google Scholar
• Valeri L, VanderWeele TJ (2013) Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psych. Methods 18(2):137–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ (2016) Mediation analysis: A practitioner’s guide. Annu. Rev. Public Health 37:17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Witte SP, Faigley L (1981) Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition Comm. 32(2):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wohn DY (2019) Volunteer moderators in Twitch micro communities: How they get involved, the roles they play, and the emotional labor they experience. Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wulf T, Schneider FM, Beckert S (2018) Watching players: An exploration of media enjoyment on Twitch. Games Culture 15(3):328–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Zhu H, Lu T, Zhang P, Gu N (2020) Exploring antecedents and consequences of toxicity in online discussions: A case study on Reddit. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interactions (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ren Y, Adomavicius G (2019) Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):839–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Yang Y, Zhao J (2023) Does game-irrelevant chatting stimulate high-value gifting in live streaming? A session-level perspective. Comput. Human Behav. 138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Hu Y, Hong Y, Westland JC (2021) Understanding characteristics of popular streamers on live streaming platforms: Evidence from Twitch.tv. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(4):1076–1098.Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Lu Y, Hu Y, Hong Y (2023) Direct and indirect spillovers from content providers’ switching: Evidence from online livestreaming. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):847–866.Link, Google Scholar