Social Sharing, Public Perception, and Brand Competition in a Horizontally Differentiated Market

References

• Aaker D (1996) Building Strong Brands (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Aaker JL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):347–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aaker JL (1999) The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. J. Marketing Res. 36(1):45–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnold M, Li C, Saliba C, Zhang L (2011) Asymmetric market shares, advertising and pricing: Equilibrium with an information gatekeeper. J. Industrial Econom. 59(1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. 34(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2008) Who drives divergence? Identity-signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):593–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birdwell, ALE (1968) A study of influence of image congruence on consumer choice. J. Bus. 41(1):76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Sen SK (1974) Market segmentation using models of multidimensional purchasing behavior: A new segmentation strategy designed to provide better information to the marketing decision maker. J Marketing 38(4):17–28.Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2011) Dynamic price competition with network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernev A, Hamilton R, Gal D (2011) Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. J. Marketing 75(3):66–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Narasimhan C, John Zhang Z (2001) Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. 20(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Xu H, Whinston AB (2011) Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2):237–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Liu Y (2012) Optimal software free trial strategy: The impact of network externalities and consumer uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):488–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Haller H (1990) Learning how to cooperate: Optimal play in repeated coordination games. Econometrica 58(3):571–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning D (2005) Self-Insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Escalas JE, Bettman JR (2005) Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. J. Consumer Res. 32(3):378–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (1988) Communication, coordination, and Nash equilibrium. Econom. Lett. 27(3):209–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forehand MR, Deshpandé R, Reed A II (2002) Identity salience and the influence of the social self-schema on advertising response. J. Appl. Psych. 87(6):1086–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using on-line conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Greeno DW, Sommers MS, Kernan JB (1973) Personality and implicit behavior patterns. J. Marketing Res. 10(1):63–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubb EL, Hupp G (1968) Perception of self, generalized stereotypes, and brand selection. J. Marketing Res. 5(1):58–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubb EL, Stern BL (1971) Self-concept and significant others. J. Marketing Res. 8(3):382–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutierrez K (2014) Studies confirm the power of visuals in eLearning. Accessed June 1, 2021, http://info.shiftelearning.com/blog/bid/350326/studies-confirm-the-power-of-visuals-in-elearning.Google Scholar
• Hamm BC, Cundiff EW (1969) Self-actualization and product perception. J. Marketing Res. 6(4):470–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Wu J, Tan Y (2017) Disconfirmation effect on online rating behavior: A structural model. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):626–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Guo H (2015) Design of consumer review systems and product pricing. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):714–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E, Schmeidler D (1990) Fixed preferences and changing tastes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):262–267.Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2007) Brand value in social interaction. Management Sci. 53(10):1634–1644.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Xie Y (2012) Competition in a status goods market. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):609–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Shachar R, Wang K (2013) Advertising and consumers’ communications. Marketing Sci. 32(2):294–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C (1988) Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4):427–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W (1995) Design innovation and fashion cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):771–792.Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Tang Q, Whinston AB (2016) Two formulas for success in social media: Learning and network effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers CR (1947) Some observations on the organization of personality. Amer. Psych. 2(September):358–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safdar K (2017) Why streetwear brand Supreme is worth $1 billion and Abercrombie isn’t. Wall Street Journal, October 18. Accessed June 1, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-streetwear-brand-supreme-is-worth-1-billion-and-abercrombie-isnt-1508331601.Google Scholar
• Sinitsyn M (2008) Price promotions in asymmetric duopolies with heterogeneous consumers. Management Sci. 54(12):2081–2087.Link, Google Scholar
• Sirgy MJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 21:261–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh J-H, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Tesser A (1988) Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 21:181–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White K, Dahl D (2007) Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):525–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Sun H, Tan Y (2013) Social media research: A review. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 22(3):257–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Cloak or flaunt? The fashion dilemma. Marketing Sci. 31(1):74–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar