Text Performance on the Vine Stage? The Effect of Incentive on Product Review Text Quality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1146

References

  • Angelidis S, Lapata M (2018) Summarizing opinions: Aspect extraction meets sentiment prediction and they are both weakly supervised. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.08858.Google Scholar
  • Barzilay R, Lapata M (2008) Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Comput. Linguistics 34(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2019) Peer awards increase user content generation but reduce content novelty. Proc. 40th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral L, Li L (2015) A dollar for your thoughts: Feedback-conditional rebates on eBay. Management Sci. 61(9):2052–2063.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econom. Surveys 22(1):31–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carenini G, Cheung JCK, Pauls A (2013) Multi-document summarization of evaluative text. Comput. Intelligence 29(4):545–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Hu YJ, Huang S (2019) Monetary incentive and stock opinions on social media. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(2):391–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark T, Salaman G (1998) Creating the “right” impression: Toward a dramaturgy of management consultancy. Service Indust. J. 18(1):18–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duan Y, Chen C, Huo J (2019) The impact of monetary rewards for online reviews. Asia Pacific J. Marketing Logist. 31(5):1486–1515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsner M, Charniak E (2011) Extending the entity grid with entity-specific features. Proc. 49th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics: Human Language Tech. (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 125–129.Google Scholar
  • Foltz PW, Kintsch W, Landauer TK (1998) The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2–3):285–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Monograph 2 (University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
  • Grosz BJ, Weinstein S, Joshi AK (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Comput. Linguist. 21(2):203–225.Google Scholar
  • Grove SJ, Fisk RP (1983) The dramaturgy of services exchange: An analytical framework for services marketing. Berry LL, Shostack GL, Upah GD, eds. Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 45–49.Google Scholar
  • Grove SJ, Fisk RP (1992) The service experience as theater. Sherry JF Jr., Sternthal B, eds. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 19 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 455–461.Google Scholar
  • Hainmueller J (2012) Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Anal. 20(1):25–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halliday M, Hasan R (1976) Cohesion in English, English Language Series No. 9 (Longman, London).Google Scholar
  • He R, Lee WS, Ng HT, Dahlmeier D (2017) An unsupervised neural attention model for aspect extraction. Barzilay R, Kan M-Y, eds. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1: Long Papers (ACL, Vancouver), 388–397.Google Scholar
  • Higgins D, Burstein J, Marcu D, Gentile C (2004) Evaluating multiple aspects of coherence in student essays. Hirschberg J, Dumais ST, Marcu D, Roukos S, eds. Human Language Tech. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (HLT-NAACL) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston), 185–192.Google Scholar
  • Hsieh G, Kraut RE, Hudson SE (2010) Why pay? Exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer. Mynatt ED, Schoner D, Fitzpatrick G, Hudson SE, Edwards WK, Rodden T, eds. Proc. 28th Internat. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI) (ACM, New York), 305–314.Google Scholar
  • Karamanis N, Poesio M, Mellish C, Oberlander J (2004) Evaluating Centering-Based Metrics of Coherence for Text Structuring Using a Reliably Annotated Corpus (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 391.Google Scholar
  • Khern-am nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic vs. intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuang L, Huang N, Hong Y, Yan Z (2019) Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: Evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):289–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z, Zhang Y, Tan Y (2019) An empirical study of free product sampling and rating bias. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):260–275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Feng J (2021) Does money talk? The impact of monetary incentives on user-generated content contributions. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print March 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0971.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Medica (Zagreb) 22(3):276–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ni J, Li J, McAuley J (2019) Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects. Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, Wan X, eds. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natl. Language Processing and 9th Internat. Joint Conf. Natl. Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 188–197.Google Scholar
  • Perrault CR, Allen JF (1978) Speech acts as a basis for understanding dialogue coherence. Waltz DL, ed. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing-2 (TINLAP), July 25–27, University of lllinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, 125–132. Accessed June 15, 2022, https://aclanthology.org/T78-1017/.Google Scholar
  • Poesio M, Stevenson R, Eugenio BD, Hitzeman J (2004) Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Comput. Linguistics 30(3):309–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qiao D, Lee SY, Whinston AB, Wei Q (2020) Financial incentives dampen altruism in online prosocial contributions: A study of online reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1361–1375.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reiter E, Dale R (2000) Building Natural Generation Systems, Studies in Natural Language Processing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solomon MR, Surprenant C, Czepiel JA, Gutman EG (1985) A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. J. Marketing 49(1):99–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephen AT, Bart Y, du Plessis C, Goncalves D (2012) Does paying for online product reviews pay off? Gürhan-Canli Z, Otnes C, Zhu R(J), eds. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 40 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 228–231.Google Scholar
  • Sun M, Zhu F (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sun Y, Dong X, McIntyre S (2017) Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Sci. 36(3):329–337.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swartz T, Iacobucci D (2000) Handbook of Services Marketing and Management (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Wang X, Sanders GL (2019) For money, and for fun: Exploring the effects of gamification and financial incentives on motivating online review generation. AMCIS 2019 Proc., vol. 1 (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
  • Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(4):5–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P (2012) Bonus, disclosure, and choice: What motivates the creation of high-quality paid reviews? Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, vol. 2 (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1763–1777.Google Scholar
  • Wang SA, Pavlou PA, Gong J (2016) On monetary incentives, online product reviews, and sales. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, vol. 2 (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1462–1481.Google Scholar
  • Wang Y, Sun A, Han J, Liu Y, Zhu X (2018) Sentiment analysis by capsules. Champin P-A, Gandon F, Lalmas M, Ipeirotis PG, eds. Proc. 2018 World Wide Web Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 1165–1174.Google Scholar
  • Witte SP, Faigley L (1981) Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition Comm. 32(2):189–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woolley K, Sharif MA (2021) Incentives increase relative positivity of review content and enjoyment of review writing. J. Marketing Res. 58(3):539–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu Y, Khern-am nuai W, Pinsonneault A (2022) When paying for reviews pays off: The case of performance-contingent monetary rewards. MIS Quart. 46(1):609–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.