Star Wars: An Empirical Study of Star Performer Turnover and Content Supply on Multisided Streaming Platforms

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Novelli E (2017) Redirecting research efforts on the diversification–performance linkage: The search for synergy. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):342–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ammann M, Horsch P, Oesch D (2016) Competing with superstars. Management Sci. 62(10):2842–2858.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK (2022) The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue sharing, and platform design. Management Sci. 68(7):5233–5251.Link, Google Scholar
• Binken JLG, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J. Marketing 73(2):88–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2022) Incentives and stars: Competition in innovation contests with participant and submission visibility. Production Oper. Management 31(3):1372–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2018) Amateurs crowds & professional entrepreneurs as platform complementors. NBER Working Paper No. 22952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bründl S, Matt C, Hess T, Engert S (2023) How synchronous participation affects the willingness to subscribe to social live streaming services: The role of co-interactive behavior on Twitch. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(5):800–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2022) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. 68(5):3488–3506.Link, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroni E, Madio L, Shekhar S (2024) Superstar exclusivity in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 70(2):991–1011.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Miller D (2012) Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):135–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA, Dagnino GB, Smith KG (2010) The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1371–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty N, Delener N (2001) Chaos theory: Marketing & management implications. J. Marketing Theory Practice 9(4):66–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Wu DJ (2021) Platform competition under network effects: Piggybacking and optimal subsidization. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):820–835.Google Scholar
• Elberse A, Leszczynski MT (2020) Ninja: Which platform wins Esports’ biggest star? Harvard Business School Case 520-036, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ershov D (2018) Competing with superstars in the mobile app market. NET Institute Working Paper 18-02, Networks, Electronic Commerce and Telecommunications Institute, New York.Google Scholar
• Esports Observer (2019) Twitch streamer ZeRo jumps ship to Facebook gaming. Accessed March 31, 2024, https://archive.esportsobserver.com/zero-facebook-gaming-move/.Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Lueker N, Heinzl A (2021) And the winner is…? The desirable and undesirable effects of platform awards. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1155–1172.Link, Google Scholar
• Forderer J, Burtch G (2025) Estimating career benefits from online community leadership: Evidence from Stack Exchange moderators. Management Sci. 71(3):1865–1888.Google Scholar
• German American Cultural Foundation (2024) American schools vs. German schools. Accessed March 31, 2024, https://www.gac-foundation.org/2015/06/24/american-schools-vs-german-schools.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Mayya R, Yu P (2024) Do non-monetary virtual gifts enhance or diminish voluntary paid gifts? Evidence from a video game live streaming platform. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Guo C, Lin M (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):497–516.Link, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Gu M, Liu D, Kumar S (2024) Navigating platform-led affiliate marketing: Implications for content creation and platform profitability. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print July 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0620.Link, Google Scholar
• Haviv A, Huang Y, Li N (2020) Intertemporal demand spillover effects on video game platforms. Management Sci. 66(10):4788–4807.Link, Google Scholar
• Hilvert-Bruce Z, Neill JT, Sjöblom M, Hamari J (2018) Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Comput. Human Behav. 84(7):58–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogendorn C, Ka Yat Yuen S (2009) Platform competition with ‘must-have’ components. J. Indust. Econom. 57(2):294–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Mojumder P, Sun T, Lv J, Golden JM (2021) Not registered? Please sign up first: A randomized field experiment on the ex ante registration request. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):914–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. MIS Quart. 44(3):1177–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(4):765–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Nielsen R (2019) Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Anal. 27(4):435–454.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Cockburn IM, Henderson R (2004) Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Adv. Strategic Management 21:133–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J. Marketing 75(6):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MH, Han SP, Park S, Oh W (2023) Positive demand spillover of popular app adoption: Implications for platform owners’ management of complements. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):961–995.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang C, Kettinger W (2022) Digital platform ecosystem dynamics: The roles of product scope, innovation, and collaborative network centrality. MIS Quart. 46(2):739–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Zhan S, Raghu TS (2019) The spillover of spotlight: Platform recommendation in the mobile app market. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1296–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin YK, Rai A (2024) The scope of software patent protection in the digital age: Evidence from alice. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):657–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Lueker N, Foerderer J, Heinzl A (2022) Competing with superstars: Does exclusive third-party content discourage complementary innovation? Bjørn-Andersen N, ed. Proc. 43rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Marchese D (2021) Teenagers made Ninja a gaming superstar. He has a message for parents. The New York Times Online (January 24), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/25/magazine/ninja-interview.html.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Google Scholar
• Ministry of School and Education NRW (2019) Kernlehrplan fuer die Sekundarstufe I Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Accessed March 20, 2025, https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/lehrplan/199/g9_e_klp_%203417_2019_06_23.pdf.Google Scholar
• Needleman SE (2019) Microsoft aims to reset videogame-streaming market with ‘Ninja’ pact. The Wall Street Journal Online (August 11), https://www.wsj.com/articles/microsoft-aims-to-reset-videogame-streaming-market-with-ninja-pact-11565547932.Google Scholar
• Parker G, van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, van Alstyne M (2018) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci. 64(7):3015–3032.Link, Google Scholar
• Perloff JM, Suslow VY, Seguin PJ (1995) Higher prices from entry: Pricing of brand-name drugs. Berkeley Competition Policy Working Paper No. CPC99-03, CA.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2018) Most European students are learning a foreign language in school while Americans lag. Accessed March 31, 2024, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/08/06/most-european-students-are-learning-a-foreign-language-in-school-while-americans-lag.Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Gopal A, Hann IH (2017) Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):225–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Raj M (2024) More is (sometimes) merrier: Heterogeneity in demand spillovers and competition on a digital platform. Strategic Management J. 45(13):2611–2641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren CR, Hu Y, Cui TH (2019) Responses to rival exit: Product variety, market expansion, and preexisting market structure. Strategic Management J. 40(2):253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robidoux B (2019) Pro gamer Ninja shocks fans by announcing he’s leaving Twitch & only streaming on Mixer. Hollywood Life Online (August 1), https://hollywoodlife.com/2019/08/01/ninja-leaves-twitch-mixer-announcement-tweet.Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(5):845–858.Google Scholar
• Rosman K (2022) Spotify bet big on Joe Rogan. It got more than it counted on. The New York Times Online (February 17), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/arts/music/spotify-joe-rogan-misinformation.html.Google Scholar
• Singh A (2023) 5 Most unexpected streamer platform signings of all time. Sportskeeda Online (June 3), https://www.sportskeeda.com/esports/unexpected-streamer-platform-signings-time.Google Scholar
• Sjöblom M, Hamari J (2017) Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Comput. Human Behav. 75(10):985–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith D (2019) Jessica Blevins, the 27-year-old manager and wife of the most popular video-game player in the world, reveals the inside story of Ninja’s move to Microsoft’s Mixer. Business Insider Online (October 2), https://www.businessinsider.com/jessica-blevins-ninja-wife-manager-on-leaving-twitch-for-mixer-2019-9?r=US&IR=T.Google Scholar
• Stephen B (2019) Ninja’s 80,000 Mixer viewers show that he’s bigger than just Twitch. The Verge Online (August 2), https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/2/20752172/ninja-mixer-viewers-twitch-fortnite.Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh JH, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S, Hitt L (2017) Is Tom Cruise threatened? An empirical study of the impact of product variety on demand concentration. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N, Lee C-H (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Acad. Management J. 47(6):876–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Yang L, Hahn J (2023) Winner takes all? The blockbuster effect on crowdfunding platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):935–960.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Singh PV, Ghose A (2019) A structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Hu Y, Hong Y, Westland JC (2021) Understanding characteristics of popular streamers on live streaming platforms: Evidence from Twitch.tv. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(4):1076–1098.Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Lu Y, Hu Y, Hong Y (2023) Direct and indirect spillovers from content providers’ switching: Evidence from online livestreaming. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):847–866.Link, Google Scholar