Two-Sided Impacts of Service Provider’s Identity Disclosure in e-Customer Service Platforms: Evidence from Two Field Experiments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0499

References

  • Al-Ubaydli O, Yeomans M (2017) Do people donate more when they perceive a single beneficiary whom they know? A field experimental test of the identifiability effect. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 66(C):96–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Awad NF, Krishnan MS (2006) The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. 30(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axt JR, Moran T, Bar-Anan Y (2018) Simultaneous ingroup and outgroup favoritism in implicit social cognition. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 79:275–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babar Y, Adeli A, Burtch G (2023) The effects of online social identity signals on retailer demand. Management Sci. 69(12):7335–7346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Bonatti A (2011) Targeting in advertising markets: Implications for offline vs. online media. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):417–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boles JS, Babin BJ (1996) On the front lines: Stress, conflict, and the customer service provider. J. Bus. Res. 37(1):41–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2018) Dispute resolution or escalation? The strategic gaming of feedback withdrawal options in online markets. Management Sci. 64(9):4009–4031.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brees J, Martinko MJ (2015) Judgments of responsibility vs. accountability. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 22(4):443–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond LR (2023) Generative AI at work. NBER Working Paper No. 31161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TK, Cheung CM, Benbasat I, Xiao B, Lee ZW (2023) Bystanders join in cyberbullying on social networking sites: The deindividuation and moral disengagement perspectives. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):828–846.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Cramton P, List JA, Ockenfels A (2021) Market design, human behavior, and management. Management Sci. 67(9):5317–5348.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby LA, Evans KR, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. J. Marketing 54(3):68–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunningham LM, Li C, Stein SE, Wright NS (2019) What’s in a name? Initial evidence of us audit partner identification using difference-in-differences analyses. Accounting Rev. 94(5):139–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Luca M, Svirsky D (2017) Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Everett JA, Faber NS, Crockett M (2015) Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers Behav. Neuroscience 9:126656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldberg A, Kim T (2018) Beyond Starbucks: How racism shapes customer service. New York Times (April 20), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/20/opinion/starbucks-racism-customer-service.html.Google Scholar
  • Festinger L, Pepitone A, Newcomb T (1952) Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 47(2):382–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fu X, Liu X, Hua C, Li Z, Du Q (2021) Understanding tour guides’ service failure: Integrating a two-tier triadic business model with attribution theory. J. Hospitality Tourism Management 47(8–9):506–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao Y, Rui H, Sun S (2023) The power of identity cues in text-based customer service: Evidence from Twitter. MIS Quart. 47(3):983–1014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ge Y, Knittel CR, MacKenzie D, Zoepf S (2020) Racial discrimination in transportation network companies. J. Public Econom. 190(C):104205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C, Wang Y (2022) Conducting research in marketing with quasi-experiments. J. Marketing 86(3):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong X, Cheung CM, Zhang KZ, Chen C, Lee MK (2021) A dual-identity perspective of obsessive online social gaming. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(5):1245–1284.Google Scholar
  • Gopal RD, Hidaji H, Patterson RA, Rolland E, Zhdanov D (2018) How much to share with third parties? User privacy concerns and website dilemmas. MIS Quart. 42(1):143–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grönroos C, Voima P (2013) Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(2):133–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunarathne P, Rui H, Seidmann A (2022) Racial bias in customer service: Evidence from Twitter. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):43–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Han E, Yin D, Zhang H (2023) Bots with feelings: Should AI agents express positive emotion in customer service? Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1296–1311.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Gavin MB, Perrewé PL, Hall AT, Frink DD (2007) Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—Job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):226–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
  • Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1999) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Reply. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):340–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M, Abrams D (1988) Special Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Hörner J, Skrzypacz A (2016) Selling information. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1515–1562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hossain T, Minor D, Morgan J (2011) Competing matchmakers: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 57(11):1913–1925.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Hong Y, Burtch G (2017) Social network integration and user content generation. MIS Quart. 41(4):1035–1058.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Burtch G, He Y, Hong Y (2022) Managing congestion in a matching market via demand information disclosure. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1196–1220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BC (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R, Li H, Liskovich I, Weintraub GY (2022) Experimental design in two-sided platforms: An analysis of bias. Management Sci. 68(10):7069–7089.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johlke MC, Duhan DF (2000) Supervisor communication practices and service employee job outcomes. J. Service Res. 3(2):154–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kao YM, Keskin NB, Shang K (2022) Impact of information asymmetry and limited production capacity on business interruption insurance. Management Sci. 68(4):2824–2841.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kearl M (2024) The impact of digital transformation on customer experience. Medallia (January 26), https://www.medallia.com/blog/digital-transformation-customer-experience-impact/.Google Scholar
  • Lee HA, Choi AA, Sun T, Oh W (2021) Reviewing before reading? An empirical investigation of book-consumption patterns and their effects on reviews and sales. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1368–1389.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li D, Mishra N, Netessine S (2023) Contracting for product support under information asymmetry. Management Sci. 69(8):4627–4645.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB, Zhang J, Wang C, Siponen M (2016) Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):962–986.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKinsey (2022) The state of customer care in 2022. (July 8), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/the-state-of-customer-care-in-2022.Google Scholar
  • McNamara N, Muldoon O, Stevenson C, Slattery E (2011) Citizenship attributes as the basis for intergroup differentiation: Implicit and explicit intergroup evaluations. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(3):243–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mei XY, Bagaas IK, Relling EK (2019) Customer complaint behaviour (CCB) in the retail sector: Why do customers voice their complaints on Facebook? Internat. Rev. Retail Distribution Consumer Res. 29(1):63–78.Google Scholar
  • Mero NP, Guidice RM, Brownlee AL (2007) Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. J. Management 33(2):223–252.Google Scholar
  • Mero NP, Guidice RM, Werner S (2014) A field study of the antecedents and performance consequences of perceived accountability. J. Management 40(6):1627–1652.Google Scholar
  • Morgan B (2019) 50 stats that prove the value of customer experience. Forbes (September 24), https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/09/24/50-stats-that-prove-the-value-of-customer-experience.Google Scholar
  • Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2010) Information disclosure and unraveling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 2(2):34–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011) What’s in a picture?: Evidence of discrimination from prosper.com. J. Human Resources 46(1):53–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pu J, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2020) Does identity disclosure help or hurt user content generation? Social presence, inhibition, and displacement effects. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):297–322.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Quey RL (1971) Functions and dynamics of work groups. Amer. Psych. 26(12):1077–1082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma D, Gill J, Kwan A (2019) Customer-centric digital transformation: Making customer success integral to the new organization. Deloitte Insights (September 5), https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/industry-4-0/customer-centric-digital-transformation.html.Google Scholar
  • Shinada M, Yamagishi T, Ohmura Y (2004) False friends are worse than bitter enemies: “Altruistic” punishment of in-group members. Evolution Human Behav. 25(6):379–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Hatch M, Schultz M, eds. Organizational Identity, vol. 4 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Tsui AS, O’Reilly CA III (1989) Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Management J. 32(2):402–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2011) Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J. Adolescent Health 48(2):121–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett D (2013) Using accountability to reduce access policy violations in information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):263–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett D (2015) Increasing accountability through user-interface design artifacts. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong RYM, Cheung CM, Xiao B, Thatcher JB (2021) Standing up or standing by: Understanding bystanders’ proactive reporting responses to social media harassment. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):561–581.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2018) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou Z, Zhang L, Van Alstyne M (2024) How users drive value in two-sided markets: Platform designs that matter. MIS Quart. 48(1):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimbardo PG (1969) The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Arnold W, Devine D, eds. Nebraska Sympos. Motivation, vol. 17 (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln), 237–307.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.