Evening the Odds in a Gendered Workplace: The Empowering Role of Knowledge Repositories

References

• Adams SM (2015) Breaking down barriers. Handbook of Gendered Careers in Management (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JR (1983) A spreading activation theory of memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 22(June):261–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreu R, Baiget J, Canals A (2008) Firm‐specific knowledge and competitive advantage: Evidence and KM practices. Knowledge Process Management 15(2):97–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aneja A, Reshef O, Subramani G (2024) Attrition and the gender patenting gap. Rev. Econom. Statist. 106(2):345–367.Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Funk RJ (2021) Interventions for improving professional networking for women: Experimental evidence from the IT sector. MIS Quart. 45(2):593–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Erdogan B (2011) Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychcology (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5, Part 2):9–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua A (2017) Commentary: Should gender differences be included in the evolutionary upgrade to cognitive load theory? Ed. Psych. Rev. 29(1):189–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharath ST, Narayanan MP, Seyhun HN (2008) Are women executives disadvantaged? Preprint, submitted October 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1276064.Google Scholar
• Breit M, Scherrer V, Tucker-Drob EM, Preckel F (2024) The stability of cognitive abilities: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psych. Bull. 150(4):399–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst Census 2005 of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500 (2005) Women Management Rev. 21(6).Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Uleman JS, Bargh JA, eds. Unintended Thought (The Guilford Press, New York), 212–252.Google Scholar
• Chung J, Monroe GS (2001) A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behav. Res. Accounting 13(1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Reutzel CR, DesJardine MR, Zhou YS (2025) Signaling theory: State of the theory and its future. J. Management 51(1):24–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croizet JC, Després G, Gauzins ME, Huguet P, Leyens JP, Méot A (2004) Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(6):721–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross SE, Madson L (1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psych. Bull. 122(1):5–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darley WK, Smith RE (1995) Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response. J. Advertising 24(1):41–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairburn JA, Malcomson JM (1994) Rewarding performance by promotion to a different Job. Eur. Econom. Rev. 38:683–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galambos NL (2004) Gender and gender role development in adolescence. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub DW (1997) Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quart. 21(4):389–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopinath G (2022) Gender equality boosts economic growth and stability [Remarks delivered at the Korea Gender Equality Forum]. Retrieved August 15, 2024, https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/09/27/sp092722-ggopinath-kgef-gender-korea.Google Scholar
• Goto SG, Lewis RS, Grayzel-Ward S (2021) Culture and self-construal. Chiao JY, Li SC, Turner R, Lee-Tauler SY, Pringle BA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Neuroscience and Global Mental Health (Oxford University Press, New York), 288–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray PH, Meister DB (2004) Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. 50(6):821–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L (2018) Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(34):8569–8574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herlitz A, Nilsson LG, Backman L (1997) Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory Cognition 25(6):801–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes K (1995) Women in non-traditional occupations. Perspectives Labor Income 7(3):14–19.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Carter NM, Silva C (2010) Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(9):80–85.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Ely RJ, Kolb DM (2013) Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(9):60–66.Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Baroudi JJ (1995) The impact of job performance evaluations on career advancement prospects: An examination of gender differences in the IS workplace. MIS Quart. 19(1):107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A (2014) By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Son J, Roh H (2015) When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1516–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Mukhopadhyay T, Kraut RE (2016) When does repository KMS use lift performance? The role of alternative knowledge sources and task environments. MIS Quart. 40(1):133–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ko DG, Dennis AR (2011) Profiting from knowledge management: The impact of time and experience. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):134–152.Link, Google Scholar
• Krivkovich A, Kutcher E, Yee L (2016) Breaking down the gender challenge. McKinsey Quart. 2:8–13.Google Scholar
• Ledwaba S, Nkomo TS (2021) An exploration of motivations for women mine workers to work underground. SAGE Open 11(3):1–11. Google Scholar
• Li Q, Lourie B, Nekrasov A, Shevlin T (2022) Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-sample archival evidence. Management Sci. 68(8):5667–5683.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metz I, Tharenou P (2001) Women’s career advancement: The relative contribution of human and social capital. Group Organ. Management 26(3):312–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J (1989) The influence of a brand name’s association set size and word frequency on brand memory. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):197–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Loken B (2015) Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. J. Consumer Psych. 25(1):129–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D (1991) Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing strategies. J. Consumer Res. 18(1):63–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Sternthal B (1991) Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):84–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldafsky NI, Kwon IW (1994) Attributes affecting computer-aided decision making—A literature survey. Comput. Human Behav. 10(3):299–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell A, Bagilhole BM, Dainty AR (2006) The problem of women’s assimilation into UK engineering cultures: Can critical mass work? Equal Opportunities Internat. 25(8):688–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):417–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, McBrier DB, Kmec JA (1999) The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):335–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson L, Kulik CT (2007) Stereotype threat at work. Acad. Management Perspectives 21(2):24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom T (2009) Crossing at a red light: Behaviour of individuals and groups. Transportation Res. Part F Traffic Psych. Behav. 12(5):389–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sebo P (2021) Using genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: How to improve the accuracy of the inference. J. Medical Library Assoc. 109(4):609.Google Scholar
• Sheridan JE, Slocum JW, Buda R (1997) Factors influencing the probability of employee promotions: A comparative analysis of human capital organization screening and gender/race discrimination theories. J. Bus. Psych. 11(3):373–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Spencer SJ, Aronson J (2002) Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 34 (Elsevier, Burlington, NJ), 379–440.Google Scholar
• Steinpreis RE, Anders KA, Ritzke D (1999) The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles 41(7):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani MR, Wagle M, Ray G, Gupta A (2021) Capability development through just-in-time access to knowledge in document repositories: A longitudinal examination of technical problem solving. MIS Quart. 45(3a):1287–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SWE (2025) U.S. Degree Attainment. https://swe.org/research/2025/us-degree-attainment.Google Scholar
• Thompson PS, Bergeron DM, Bolino MC (2020) No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 105(11):1338–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tom A, Granié MA (2011) Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads. Accident Anal. Prevention 43(5):1794–1801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trauth EM (2013) The role of theory in gender and information systems research. Inform. Organ. 23(4):277–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS, Oosterhof A (2006) Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. 49(5):877–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. 24(1):115–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Sykes TA, Ackerman PL (2004) Individual reactions to new technologies in the workplace: The role of gender as a psychological construct. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 34(3):445–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Windeler JB, Bartol KM, Williamson IO (2017) Person-organization and person-job fit perceptions of new IT employees: Work outcomes and gender differences. MIS Quart. 41(2):525–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel C, Issa M, Ma R, Stokes A (2011) Stereotype threat: Antecedents and consequences for working women. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 41(2):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (2013) Classic promotion tournaments versus market-based tournaments. Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 31(3):198–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woetzel L, Madgavkar A, Kweilin E, Labaye E (2015) The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women’s Equality Can Add $12 Trillion to Global Growth (McKinsey Global Institute, New York).Google Scholar