Anticipating the Digital: How Interpretive Debt and Layered Architectural Framing Shape Innovation Pathways

References

• Aanestad M, Grisot M, Hanseth O, Vassilakopoulou P (2017) Information infrastructures and the challenge of the installed base. Aanestad M, Grisot M, Hanseth O, Vassilakopoulou P, eds. Information Infrastructures within European Health Care: Working with the Installed Base (Springer International Publishing, Cham), 25–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2008) Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. 32(4):779–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2020) Principles and models for organizing the IT function. Galliers RD, Leidner DE, Simeonova B, eds. Strategic Information Management (Routledge, New York), 243–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alves NSR, Mendes TS, de Mendonça MG, Spínola RO, Shull F, Seaman C (2016) Identification and management of technical debt: A systematic mapping study. Inform. Softw. Tech. 70:100–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvidsson V, Holmström J, Lyytinen K (2014) Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 23(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P (1992) Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. 3(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Azad B, Faraj S (2008) Making e-Government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 17(2):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azad B, Faraj S (2011) Social power and information technology implementation: A contentious framing lens. Inform. Systems J. 21(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Faraj S, Hinds PJ, Leonardi PM, von Krogh G (2022) We are all theorists of technology now: A relational perspective on emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R, Liang Y, Ramasubbu N (2021) Technical debt and firm performance. Management Sci. 67(5):3174–3194.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. 1(3):220–247.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley WC (2015) Anticipatory work: How the need to represent knowledge across boundaries shapes work practices within them. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1612–1628.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Meyerson DE, Grodal S (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22(4):887–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Heracleous L, Walsham G (2013) A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quart. 37(1):201–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckert J (2016) Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendig D, Wagner R, Piening EP, Foege JN (2023) Attention to digital innovation: Exploring the impact of a chief information officer in the top management team. MIS Quart. 47(4):1487–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogers MLAM, Garud R, Thomas LDW, Tuertscher P, Yoo Y (2022) Digital innovation: Transforming research and practice. Innovation 24(1):4–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Catino M (2013) Organizational Myopia: Problems of Rationality and Foresight in Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, London; Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Clausen RT, Nielsen JA, Mathiassen L (2024) Organising and managing digital platform renewal: The role of framing and overflowing. Inform. Systems J. 34(5):1440–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker GG (2018) Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the Digital Age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Cunningham W (1992) The WyCash portfolio management system. Proc. 7th Object-Oriented Programming Systems Languages Appl. (ACM, New York), 29–30.Google Scholar
• Davidson EJ (2002) Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quart. 26(4):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLanda M (2013) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (Bloomsbury Academic, London).Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann DM, Phillips N (2013) Organizational learning and the technology of foolishness: The case of virtual worlds at IBM. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feuls M, Hernes T, Schultz M (2024) Putting distant futures into action: How actors sustain a course of action toward distant-future goals through path enactment. Acad. Management J. 68(2):297–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghanbari H, Ahuja S, Lee B, Gaskin J (2025) Who should pay for technical debt? Exploring software professionals perceptions about technical debt accountability. Inform. Organ. 35(3):100589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine PubCo, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Grisot M, Hanseth O, Thorseng A (2014) Innovation of, in, on infrastructures: Articulating the role of architecture in information infrastructure evolution. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(4):197–219.Google Scholar
• Handunge V, Oborn E, Barrett M (2026) Digital futures and cultivating imagined ecosystems: The rise and fall of the first digital pill venture. MIS Quart. 50(1):115–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Nandhakumar J, Scarbrough H, Panourgias N (2018) Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Inform. Organ. 28(2):89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holvitie J, Licorish SA, Spínola RO, Hyrynsalmi S, MacDonell SG, Mendes TS, Buchan J, Leppänen V (2018) Technical debt and agile software development practices and processes: An industry practitioner survey. Inform. Softw. Tech. 96:141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hovorka D, Mueller B (2026) Conditions of Possibility: Futures with not Futures of Proceedings of the 59th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu), 6010–6019.Google Scholar
• Hovorka D, Peter S (2021) Speculatively engaging future(s): Four theses. MIS Quart. 45(1):461–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hylving L, Schultze U (2020) Accomplishing the layered modular architecture in digital innovation: The case of the car’s driver information module. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 29(3):101621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D, Sibony O (2011) Before you make that big decision. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(6):50–60, 137.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Orlikowski WJ (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organ. Sci. 24(4):965–995.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kar AK, He W, Payton FC, Grover V, Al-Busaidi AS, Dwivedi YK (2025) How could quantum computing shape information systems research—An editorial perspective and future research directions. Internat. J. Inform. Management 80:102776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2019) Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruchten P, Nord RL, Ozkaya I (2012) Technical debt: From metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Softw. 29(6):18–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Recker J, Yoo Y, Rosenkranz C (2022) Designing digital market offerings: How digital ventures navigate the tension between generative digital technology and the current environment. MIS Quart. 46(3):1453–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011a) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011b) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Leavell V (2026) Knowing enough to be dangerous: The problem of “Artificial Certainty” for expert authority when using AI for decision making and planning. Organ. Sci. 37(2):516–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N (2021) All information systems theory is grounded theory. MIS Quart. 45(1):489–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Avgeriou P, Liang P (2015) A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management. J. Systems Softw. 101:193–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofland J, Lofland LH (1995) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3rd ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K (2022) Innovation logics in the digital era: A systemic review of the emerging digital innovation regime. Innovation 24(1):13–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Rose GM (2003) The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: The case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Quart. 27(4):557–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Sørensen C, Tilson D (2017) Generativity in digital infrastructures: A research note. Galliers RD, Stein M-K, eds. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Sturtevant DJ (2016) Technical debt and system architecture: The impact of coupling on defect-related activity. J. Systems Softw. 120:170–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martini A, Bosch J, Chaudron M (2015) Investigating architectural technical debt accumulation and refactoring over time: A multiple-case study. Inform. Softw. Tech. 67:237–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M (2013) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1225–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Wang D (D), Tian C (A) (2022) Discursive fields and the diversity-coherence paradox: An ecological perspective on the blockchain community discourse. MIS Quart. 46(3):1421–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Pollock N, Williams R (2014) Innovation in information infrastructures: Introduction to the special issue. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(4):i–x.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nimbargi S, Mhaisne S, Nangare S, Sinha M (2016) Review on AMI technology for Smart Meter. Proc. 2016 IEEE Internat. Conf. Adv. Electronics Comm. Computer Technology (ICAECCT) (Pune, India), 21–27.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 12(2):174–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orr JE (1996) Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (ILR Press/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Yoo Y, Recker J, Kim I (2022) From lock-in to transformation: A path-centric theory of emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):194–211.Link, Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Rodriguez J, Grover V (2022) Digital strategic initiatives and digital resources: Construct definition and future research directions. MIS Quart. 46(4):2289–2315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch T (1996) The social construction of technology: A review. Fox R, ed. Technological Change (Routledge, London), 17–36.Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3):399–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu N, Kemerer CF (2016) Technical debt and the reliability of enterprise software systems: A competing risks analysis. Management Sci. 62(5):1487–1510.Link, Google Scholar
• Rinta-Kahila T, Penttinen E, Lyytinen K (2023) Getting trapped in technical debt: Sociotechnical analysis of a legacy system’s replacement. MIS Quart. 47(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Lyytinen KJ (2021) Exploring the tensions between Management of Architectural Debt and Digital Innovation: The case of a financial organization. Proc. 54th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) Managing digital platforms in user organizations: The interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):419–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlagwein D, Gozman D, Manusu AP (2026) Cryptocurrency frames of reference: A case study of accepting ‘Bitcoin-as-X’. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 35(1):54–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott S, Orlikowski W (2022) The digital undertow: How the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):311–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Segars AH, Grover V (1999) Profiles of strategic information systems planning. Inform. Systems Res. 10(3):199–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Shao Z, Li X, Wang Q (2022) From ambidextrous learning to digital creativity: An integrative theoretical framework. Inform. Systems J. 32(3):544–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing Digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo Cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research Commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Treem JW, Dailey SL, Pierce CS, Leonardi PM (2015) Bringing technological frames to work: How previous experience with social media shapes the technology’s meaning in an organization. J. Comm. 65(2):396–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (2011) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Whitehead AN (1920) The Concept of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Lyytinen KJ, Boland RJ, Berente N (2010) The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges. Preprint, submitted June 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Kallinikos J, Gregory R, Burtch G, Chatterjee S, Sarker S (2024) The next frontiers of digital innovation research. Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1507–1523.Link, Google Scholar