Schedule-Based Group Assignment Using Constraint Programming

References

• Bacon DR, Stewart KA, Anderson ES (2001) Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation and Gaming 32(1):6–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker KR, Powell SG (2002) Methods for assigning students to groups: A study of alternative objective functions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(4):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabrera AF, Crisman JL, Bernal EM, Nora A, Terenzini PT, Pascarella ET (2002) Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. J. College Student Development 43(1):20–34.Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Mladenović N, Villeneuve D (2005) Design of balanced MBA student teams. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(1):60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hübscher R (2010) Assigning students to groups using general and context-specific criteria. IEEE Tran. Learn. Tech. 3(3):178–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM (2009) IBM Completes Acquisition of Ilog, accessed December 2, 2012, http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/26403.wss.Google Scholar
• IBM (2012) IBM Academic Initiative, accessed December 2, 2012, http://www.ibm.com/academicinitiative/.Google Scholar
• Jackson D (2010) An international profile of industry-relevant competencies and skill gaps in modern graduates. Internat. J. Management Ed. 8(3):29–58.Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith A (1998) Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change 30(4):26–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krass D, Ovchinnikov A (2006) The University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management uses management science to create MBA study groups. Interfaces 36(2):126–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Layton RA, Loughry ML, Ohland MW, Ricco GD (2010) Design and validation of a Web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria. Adv. Engrg. Ed. 2(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Lustig IJ, Puget J-F (2001) Program does not equal program: Constraint programming and its relationship to mathematical programming. Interfaces 31(6):29–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Oakley B, Felder RM, Brent R, Elhajj I (2004) Turning student groups into effective teams. J. Student Centered Learn. 2(1):9–34.Google Scholar
• Prince M (2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Engrg. Ed. 93(3):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1995) Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Rev. Ed. Res. 65(2):129–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SFSU (2012a) Fall 2012 Undergraduate Student Profile, accessed December 2, 2012, https://sites.sfsu.edu/sites/sites.sfsu.edu.air/files/campprof12.pdf.Google Scholar
• SFSU (2012b) Total Enrollment by Ethnicity and Class Level, accessed December 2, 2012, https://sites.sfsu.edu/sites/sites.sfsu.edu.air/files/new_ethnic124.pdf.Google Scholar
• Soh L-K, Khandaker N, Jiang H (2008) I-MINDS: A multiagent system for intelligent computer-supported collaborative learning and classroom management. Internat. J. Artificial Intelligence Ed. 18(2):119–151.Google Scholar
• Wang D-Y, Lin SSJ, Sun C-T (2007) DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups. Comput. Human Behav. 23(3):1997–2010.Crossref, Google Scholar