A Student-Centered Approach to the Business School Management Science Course

References

• Bandura A (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28(2):117–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croll G (2005) The importance and criticality of spreadsheets in the city of London. Eur. Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group 6th Sympos. Proc., London, 83–93. Accessed June 1, 2015, http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4063.Google Scholar
• Farasyn I, Perkoz K, van de Velde W (2008) Spreadsheet models for inventory target setting at Procter and Gamble. Interfaces 38(4, Jul.–Aug.):241–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman TA (2001) Causes of the decline of the business school management science course. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 1(2):51–61. Accessed July 4, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.1.2.51.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman TA (2006) Integrating spreadsheet engineering in a management science course: A hierarchical approach. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 7(1, September):18–36. Accessed July 4, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.7.1.18.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman TA, Mehrotra V, Özlük Ö (2007) Lessons from mission-critical spreadsheets. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(60):1009–1042. Accessed July 18, 2014, http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol20/iss1/60/.Google Scholar
• Grossman TA, Mehrotra VM, Sidaoui M (2015) Tutorial on teaching business students to create a high-quality analytical spreadsheet model: A case-based approach. Working Paper, University of San Francisco, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Grossman TA, Norback JS, Hardin JR, Forehand GA (2008) Managerial communication of analytical work. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 8(3, May):125–138. Accessed July 4, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.1080.0010.Link, Google Scholar
• Jonassen D, Land S (2000) The Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jordan E, Lasdon L, Lenard M, Moore J, Powell S, Willemain T (1997) OR/MS and MBAs: Report of the operating subcommittee of the INFORMS business school education task force. OR/MS Today 24(1, January):36–41.Google Scholar
• Leblanc LJ, Grossman TA (2008) The use of spreadsheet software in the application of management science and operations research. Interfaces 38(4, July–August):225–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Leong T-Y, Cheong MLF (2008) Teaching business modeling using spreadsheets. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 9(1):20–34. Accessed Juune 1, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.1080.0015.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyons IM, Beilock SL (2012) Mathematics anxiety: Separating the math from the anxiety. Cerebral Cortex 22(9):2102–2110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell S (1996) Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules (Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA).Google Scholar
• Oggier C, Fragnière E, Stuby J (2005) Nestlé improves its financial reporting with management science. Interfaces 35(4):271–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Olavson T, Fry C (2008) Spreadsheet decision-support tools: Lessons learned at Hewlett-Packard. Interfaces 38(4):300–310.Link, Google Scholar
• Powell SG (1997) The teachers’ forum: From intelligent consumer to active modeler, two MBA success stories. Interfaces 27(3):88–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Powell SG (2008) Personal communication.Google Scholar
• Powell SG, Baker K (2007) The Art of Modeling with Spreadsheets, 2/e (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Powell SG, Baker K (2013) The Art of Modeling with Spreadsheets, 4/e (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Powell SG, Willemain TR (2007) How novices formulate models. Part I: Qualitative insights and implications for teaching. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(8):983–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage SL (2009) The Flaw of Averages (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 22.Google Scholar
• Schrage M (1990) Chapter 2: A spreadsheet way of knowing. Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Willemain TR, Powell SG (2007) How novices formulate models. Part II: A quantitative description of behaviour. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(10):1271–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar