Game—The Online Wood Supply Game

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2017.0174

References

  • Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR, Towill DR (2004) The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153(3):727–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Amours S, Frayret J, Gaudreault J, Lebel L, Martel A, Vincent M (2009) Chaînes de création de valeur. Manuel de foresterie MultiMondes, Québec.Google Scholar
  • Dominguez R, Framinan JM, Cannella S (2014) Serial vs. divergent supply chain networks: A comparative analysis of the bullwhip effect. International J. Production Res. 52(7):2194–2210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fjeld D, D’Amours S, Eriksson LO, Frisk M, Lemieux S, Marier P, Rönnqvist M (2014) Developing training for industrial wood supply management. International J. Forest Engrg. 25(2):101–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fjeld DE (2001a) Industrial dynamics in the forest sector—A Beer game application? Palmgren M, Rönnqvist M, eds. Logistik ochoptimering inom skogsindustrin (Linköpings Univ ersitet), 13–22.Google Scholar
  • Fjeld DE (2001b) The wood supply game as an educational application for simulating industrial dynamics in the forest sector. Sjöström K, Rask L-O, eds. Supply Chain Management for Paper and Timber Industries (Växjö University, Timber Logistics Club), 241–252.Google Scholar
  • Forrester JW (1958) Industrial dynamics—A major breaktrhough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 36(4):37–66.Google Scholar
  • Griffin P (2007) The use of classroom games in management science and operations research. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 8(1):1–2.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haartveit EY, Fjeld DE (2002) Experimenting with industrial dynamics in the forest sector—A Beer game application. Proc. Sympos. Models and Systems in Forestry, Punta de Tralca, Chile.Google Scholar
  • Haartveit EY, Fjeld DE (2003a) The wood supply game—A logistics flight simulator for the forest sector. Proc. 15th Annual Conf. Nordic Researchers Logist., NOFOMA 2003, Oulu, Finland, 512–526.Google Scholar
  • Haartveit EY, Fjeld DE (2003b) Simulating effects of supply chain configuration on industrial dynamics in the forest sector. International J. Forest Engrg. 14(2):21–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hung SJ (2011) Activity-based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL-ANP fuzzy goal programming approach. Expert Systems Appl. 38(8):9053–9062.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs RF (2000) Playing the Beer distribution game over the internet. Production Oper. Management 9(1):31–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lockamy A III (2008) Examining supply chain networks using V-A-T material flow analysis. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 13(5):343–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Québec Forest Industry Council (2013) Statistiques. Accessed July 12, 2017, http://www.cifq.com/documents/file/Statistiques/qd3575-cifq-brochure-statistique-2013-hr.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Rönnqvist M, D’Amours S, Weintraub A, Jofre A, Gunn E, Haight, R, Martell D, Murray A, Romero C (2015) Operations research challenges in forestry: 33 open problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 232(1):11–40.Google Scholar
  • Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2003) Designing and Managing the Supply Chain, 2nd ed. (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD (1984) Instructions for Running the Beer Distribution Game (D-3679), System Dynamics Group, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD (1988) Deterministic chaos in models of human behavior: Methodological issues and experimental results. System Dynam. Rev. 4(1–2):148–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wright CP (2015) The Zu Zitter Game?: A course-long tool for teaching operations management. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 15(3):240–253.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.