Teaching Use of Binary Variables in Integer Linear Programs: Formulating Logical Conditions

References

• Anderson DR, Sweeney DJ, Williams TA, Camm JD, Cochran JJ, Fry MJ, Ohlmann JW (2016) An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making, 14th ed. (South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Brown GB, Dell RF (2007) Formulating integer linear programs: A rogue’s gallery. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 7(2):153–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Camm JD (1990) Cutting big M down to size. Interfaces 20(5):61–66.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen D-S, Batson RG, Dang Y (2010) Applied Integer Programming: Modeling and Solution (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Frontline Systems, Inc. (2016) Frontline Solvers Reference Guide, Version 2016-R3.Google Scholar
• Gartner (2015) Market guide for optimization solutions. Accessed July 23, 2017, www.gartner.com.Google Scholar
• Gordon L, Erkut E (2004) Improving volunteer scheduling for the Edmonton folk festival. Interfaces 34(5):367–376.Link, Google Scholar
• Hooker J (2011) Formulating good MILP models. Cochran J, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klotz E, Newman AM (2013) Practical guidelines for solving difficult mixed integer linear programs. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 18(1–2):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Lim Z, Yeong S, Ng S, Venkatraman V, Chee M (2007) Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: Neuroanatomical correlates. Brain Res. 1155:163–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lesser LM (2011) On the use of mnemonics for teaching statistics. Model Assisted Statist. Appl. 6(2):151–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester F (2013) Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. Math. Enthusiast 10(1–2):245–278.Google Scholar
• Murphy FH, Panchanadam V (1999) Using analogical reasoning and schema formation to improve the success in formulating linear programming models. Oper. Res. 47(5):663–674.Link, Google Scholar
• Nemhauser G, Wolsey L (1999) Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Newman AM, Weiss M (2013) A survey of linear and mixed-integer optimization tutorials. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 14(1):26–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Plastria F (2002) Formulating logical implications in combinatorial optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(2):338–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell S, Willemain T (2007) How novices formulate models. Part I: Qualitative insights and implications for teaching. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(8):983–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam AL (2015) Mnemonics in education: Current research and applications. Translational Issues Psych. Sci. 1(2):130–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens SP, Palocsay SW (2004) A translation approach to teaching linear program formulation. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 4(3):38–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Trick M (2005) Formulations and reformulations in integer programming. Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (Springer, Berlin), 366–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HP (2009) Logic and Integer Programming (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HP (2013) Model Building in Mathematical Programming, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Williams JAS, Rankin M, Gallamore K, Reid R (2016) Beyond model formulation: Assessment of novices graphing, interpreting, and writing about their model and solution. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 17(1):13–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Winch JK, Yurkiewicz J (2014) Class scheduling with linear programming. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 15(1):143–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Winston WL, Albright SC (2016) Practical Management Science, 5th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar