Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Business Courses: A Statistical Study

References

• Akaike H (1985) Prediction and entropy. Atkinson AC, Fienberg SE, eds. A Celebration of Statistics (Springer, New York), 1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arendale DR (2001) Supplemental instruction (SI): Review of research concerning the effectiveness of SI from The University of Missouri-Kansas City and other institutions from across the United States.Accessed July 15, 2015, http://www.tc.umn.edu/arend011/SIresearchreview01.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ashburn E (2006) Hiring special instructors for classes with high failure rates. The Chronicle of Higher Ed. B3.Google Scholar
• Blanc RA, DeBuhr LE, Martin DC (1983) Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of supplemental instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. J. Higher Ed. 54(1):80–89.Google Scholar
• Bonsangue M, Cadwalladerolsker T, Fernandez-Weston C, Filowitz M, Hershey J, Moon HS, Renne Cet al. (2014) The effect of supplemental instruction on transfer student success in first semester calculus. The Learn. Assistance Rev. 18(1):61–75.Google Scholar
• Bowles T, McCoy A, Bates S (2008) The effect of supplemental instruction on timely graduation. College Student J. 42(30):853–859.Google Scholar
• Bridgham RG, Scarborough S (1992) Effects of supplemental instruction in selected medical school science courses. Academic Medicine RIME Supplement 67(10):569–571.Google Scholar
• Brower AM, Ketterhagen A (2004) Is there an inherent mismatch between how black and white students expect to succeed in college and what their colleges expect from them? J. Soc. Issues 60(1):95–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burmeister S (1996) Supplemental instruction: An interview with Deanna Martin. J. Developmental Ed. 20(1):22–26.Google Scholar
• Commander NF, Stratton CB, Callahan CA, Smith BD (1996) A learning assistance model for expanding academic support. J. Developmental Ed. 20(2):8–16.Google Scholar
• Congos DH (2003) Health checklist for supplemental instruction (SI) programs. The Learn. Assistance Rev. 8(2):29–45.Google Scholar
• Dawson P, van der Meer J, Skalicky J, Cowley K (2014) On the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Rev. Ed. Res. 84(4):609–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayowski V, MacMillan P (2008) An evaluation of the supplemental instruction programme in a first year calculus course. Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. 39(7):843–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gainen J (1995) Barriers to success in quantitative gatekeeper courses. Gainen J, Williamson EW, eds. Fostering Student Success in Quantitative Gateway Courses (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 5–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gattis KW (2002) Responding to self-selection bias in assessments of academic support programs: A motivational control study of supplemental instruction. Learn. Assistance Rev. 7(2):26–36.Google Scholar
• Herndon MK, Moore JL (2002) African american factors for student success: Implications for families and counselors. The Family J.: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families. 10(3):322–327.Google Scholar
• Horn L, Peter K, Rooney K (2002) Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999–2000 (NCES 2002–168). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Horn LJ, Premo MD (1995) Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 1992–93, with an essay on undergraduates at risk (NCES 96–237). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones J (2013) The impact of the supplemental instruction leader on student performance in introductory accounting. Amer. J. Bus. Ed. 6(2):247–254.Google Scholar
• Kenney P (1989) Effects of supplemental instruction on student performance in a college level mathematics course, university of Texas-Austin. Dissertation Abstr. Soc. Sci. 50, DA8909688.Google Scholar
• Kenney PA, Kallison JM (1994) Research studies of the effectiveness of supplemental instruction in mathematics. Martin DC, Arendale D, eds. Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 75–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockie NM, Van Lanen RJ (2008) Impact of the supplemental instruction experience on science SI leaders. J. Developmental Ed. 31(3):2–14.Google Scholar
• Lyle K, Robinson W (2003) A statistical evaluation: Peer-led team learning in an organic chemistry class. J. Chemical Ed. 80(2):132–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malm J, Bryngfors L, Morner L (2010) Supplemental instruction (SI) at the Faculty of Engineering (LTH), Lund University, Sweden: An evaluation of the SI program at five LTH engineering programs, Autumn 2008. Australian J. Peer Learn. 3(1):38–50.Google Scholar
• Malm J, Bryngfors L, Morner L (2011) Supplemental instruction: Whom does it serve? Internat. J. Teaching Learn. Higher Ed. 23(3): 282–291.Google Scholar
• Martin DC, Arendale D (1992) Supplemental instruction: Improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience (University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC).Google Scholar
• McCarthy A, Smuts B, Cosser M (1997) Assessing the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A critique and a case study. Stud. Higher Ed. 22(2):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Goldstein (2015) Designing early detection and intervention techniques via predictive statistical models—A case study on improving student performance in a business statistics course. Comm. Statist. Case Stud., Data Anal. Appl. 1(1):9–21.Google Scholar
• Moore R, LeDee O (2006) Supplemental instruction and the performance of developmental education students in an introductory biology course. J. College Reading Learn. 38(2):9–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray MH (2006) PASS: Primed, persistent and pervasive. Presented at the 2nd National PASS Day Conf., Gold Coast,Australia.Google Scholar
• Ogden P, Thompson D, Russell A, Simons C (2003) Supplemental instruction: Short and long-term impact. J. Developmental Ed. 26(3):2–8.Google Scholar
• Peters A, Mani D, Rasathurai S, Greene M (2007) The effectiveness of supplemental instruction and technology in increasing student performance in mathematics (supplemental instruction update). The International Center for SI, University of Missouri–Kansas City (Kansas City, MO).Google Scholar
• Rabitoy ER, Hoffman JL, Person DR (2015) Supplemental instruction: The effect of demographic and academic preparation variables on community college student academic achievement in STEM-related fields. J. Hispanic Higher Ed. 14(3):240–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seymour E, Hewitt N (1997) Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder. Westview.Google Scholar
• Shaya SB, Petty HR, Petty LI (1993) Education: A case study of supplemental instruction in biology focuses on at-risk students. Bioscience 43(10):709–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stout M, McDaniel AJ (2006) Benefits to supplemental instruction leaders. New Directions for Teaching Learn. 2006(106):55–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobias S (1990) They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier: Tucson. Research Corporation.Google Scholar
• Widmar GE (1994) Supplemental instruction: From small beginnings to a national program. New Directions for Teaching Learn. 1994(60):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox FK, Koehler C (1996) Supplemental instruction: Critical thinking and academic assistance. Metropolitan Universities: Internat. Forum 6(4):87–99.Google Scholar
• Zaritsky J (2006) Supplemental instruction at a community college: The four pillars. New Directions for Teaching Learn. 2006(106):23–31.Crossref, Google Scholar