Game—Introduction to Reverse Auctions: The BucknellAuto Game

References

• Anton JJ, Yao DA (1989) Split awards, procurement, and innovation. The RAND J. Econom. 20(4):538–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashenbaum B (2010) The twenty-minute just-in-time exercise. Decision Sci. J. Innovative Ed. 8(1):269–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson W (2008) Pfizer’s 12 tips for reverse auction success. Purchasing 137(12):56–58.Google Scholar
• Bell PC (2000) Teaching business statistics with microsoft excel. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 1(1):18–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Stevens CK (2007) Electronic reverse auction configuration and its impact on buyer price and supplier perceptions of opportunism: A laboratory experiment. J. Oper. Management 25(5):1035–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. The RAND J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen-Ritzo C-H, Harrison TP, Kwasnica AM, Thomas DJ (2005) Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. 51(12):1753–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Eliashberg J, Huber J, Saini R (2005) Emotional bidders—An analytical and experimental examination of consumers’ behavior in a priceline-like reverse auction. Management Sci. 51(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2002) Realizing savings from online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 7(1):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E (2006) E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Sci. 52(4):581–596.Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E (2007) Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory 33(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Haruvy E, Katok E (2007) A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 26(5):629–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Giampietro C, Emiliani ML (2007) Coercion and reverse auctions. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 12(2):75–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin P (2007) The use of classroom games in management science and operations research. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 8(1):1–2.Link, Google Scholar
• Hawkins TG, Gravier MJ, Wittmann CM (2010) Enhancing reverse auction use theory: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 15(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins TG, Randall WS, Coyne AV, Baitalmal MH (2014) Sustainable integrity: How reverse auctions can benefit sellers in emerging markets. Supply Chain Management 19(2):126–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaureguiberry F, Tappata M (2015) Game—The hotel game: Pricing simulations with opaque and transparent channels. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 16(1):24–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D (1993) Independent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second-and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econom. J. 103(419):868–879.Google Scholar
• Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi D (1998) A new computerized beer game: A tool for teaching the value of integrated supply chain management. Lee HL, Ng SM, eds. Global Supply Chain and Technology Management (Production and Operations Management Society, Miami, FL), 216–225.Google Scholar
• Klotz DE, Chatterjee K (1995) Variable split awards in a single-stage procurement model. Group Decision and Negotiation 4(4):295–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Chang CW (2007) Reverse auctions: How much total supply chain cost savings are there?—A business simulation model. J. Revenue and Pricing Management 6(3):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Maher M (2008) Are the temptations of online reverse auctions appropriate for your business? Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 13(4):304–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lojo MP (2016) Improving undergraduate student performance on the littlefield simulation. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 16(2):54–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P (1989) Auctions and bidding: A primer. J. Econom. Perspect. 3(3):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5):1089–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyaoka J (2005) Making operations management fun: Littlefield technologies. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 5(2):80–83.Link, Google Scholar
• Monczka R, Handfield R, Giunipero L, Patterson J (2011) Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. (South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Pearcy D, Giunipero L, Wilson A (2007) A model of relational governance in reverse auctions. J. Supply Chain Management 43(1):4–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders NR (2011) Supply Chain Management: A Global Perspective (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Schoenherr T (2008) Diffusion of online reverse auctions for B2B procurement: An exploratory study. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 28(3):259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri S, Ragatz GL (2004) Multiattribute reverse auctions in b2b exchanges: A framework for design and implementation. J. Supply Chain Management 40(4):52–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tassabehji R, Taylor WA, Beach R, Wood A (2006) Reverse e-auctions and supplier-buyer relationships: An exploratory study. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 26(2):166–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teich JE, Wallenius H, Wallenius J (2005) The bread/flour/grain trading game: Bidding in and designing auction events. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 5(3):42–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR, Katok E (2012) When does it pay to delay supplier qualification? Theory and experiments. Management Sci. 58(11):2057–2075.Link, Google Scholar
• Yeniyurt S, Watson S, Carter CR, Stevens CK (2011) To bid or not to bid: Drivers of bidding behavior in electronic reverse auctions. J. Supply Chain Management 47(1):60–72.Crossref, Google Scholar