Dynamic Interactive Visualizations: Implications of Seeing, Doing, and Playing for Quantitative Analysis Pedagogy

References

• Akçay AE, Ertek G, Büyüközkan G (2012) Analyzing the solutions of DEA through information visualization and data mining techniques: SmartDEA framework. Expert Systems Appl. 39(9):7763–7775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Jankowski P, Keim D, Kraak MJ, MacEachren A, Wrobel S (2007) Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda. Internat. J. Geographical Inform. Sci. 21(8):839–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aschwanden C (2015) Not even scientists can easily explain P-values. Accessed October 10, 2018, http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/not-even-scientists-can-easily-explain-p-values/.Google Scholar
• Baloukas T, Paparrizos K, Sifaleras A (2005) Promoting operations research education using a new web-accessible didactic tool. Proc. 7th Balkan Conf. Oper. Res. (University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania), 393–398.Google Scholar
• Baloukas T, Paparrizos K, Sifaleras A (2009) Teaching note—An animated demonstration of the uncapacitated Network Simplex algorithm. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 10(1):34–40.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee G, Patwardhan M, Mavinkurve M (2013) Teaching with visualizations in classroom setting: Mapping instructional strategies to instructional objectives. Internat. Conf. Tech. Ed. (Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos, CA), 176–183.Google Scholar
• Camm J, Cochran J, Fry M, Ohlmann J, Anderson D (2017) Essentials of Business Analytics, 2nd ed. (Cengage, Boston), 626–627.Google Scholar
• Chopra S, Meindl P (2015) Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 6th ed. (Pearson Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt M, Price BA, Domingue J (1992) Software visualization as a pedagogical tool. Instructional Sci. 21(5):335–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JR (2015) Teaching note—Analytic visualization of solver output. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 15(3):232–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Garay GR, Tchernykh A, Drozdov AY, Garichev SN, Nesmachnow S, Torres-Martinez M (2019) Visualization of VHDL-based simulations as a pedagogical tool for supporting computer science education. J. Comput. Sci. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang W, Eades P, Hong SH (2009) Measuring effectiveness of graph visualizations: A cognitive load perspective. Inform. Visualization 8(3):139–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones CV (1996) Visualization and Optimization (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keim D, Andrienko G, Fekete JD, Görg C, Kohlhammer J, Melançon G (2008) Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges. Kerren A, Stasko JT, Fekete J-D, North C, eds. Information Visualization (Springer, Berlin), 154–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keim DA, Mansmann F, Schneidewind J, Ziegler H (2006) Challenges in visual data analysis. Proc. 10th IEEE Internat. Conf. Inform. Visualisation (IV’06) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA), 9–16.Google Scholar
• Keim DA, Munzner T, Rossi F, Verleysen M (2015) Bridging information visualization with machine learning (Dagstuhl Seminar 15101). Dagstuhl Rep. 5(3):1–27.Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SS (2011) Analytical clarifications and an easy Excel-based implementation of a basic location model in operations management. Internat. J. Inform. Oper. Management Ed. 4(1):22–34.Google Scholar
• Kumar AN (2015) The effectiveness of visualization for learning expression evaluation. Proc. 46th ACM Tech. Sympos. Comput. Sci. Ed. (ACM, New York), 362–367.Google Scholar
• Kuo C, White RE (2004) A note on the treatment of the center-of-gravity method in operations management textbooks. Decision Sci. J. Innovative Ed. 2(2):219–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazaridis V, Paparrizos K, Samaras N, Sifaleras A (2007) Visual LinProg: A web-based educational software for linear programming. Comput. Appl. Engrg. Ed. 15(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu LH, Deng FA (2011) Reformation of mathematical experiment course system and construction of practical platform in college. Modern Comput. 6:9.Google Scholar
• Markham IS, Palocsay SW (2006) Scenario analysis in spreadsheets with Excel’s Scenario tool. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 6(2):23–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Naps TL, Rößling G, Almstrum V, Dann W, Fleischer R, Hundhausen C, Velázquez-Iturbide JÁ (2002) Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 35(2):131–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramsden P (1997) Mathematica in education: Old wine in new bottles or a whole new vineyard? Innovation in Mathematics, vol. 15 (WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Southampton, UK), 419–426.Google Scholar
• Sato H, Muro K, Hasegawa A, Zhao D (2003) Mathematica as a powerful and practical tool for displaying animated three‐dimensional structures of the Earth’s interior. Geochemistry Geophys. Geosystems 4(4):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders-Smits GN, Gürdal Z, Hol J (2005) Innovative teaching of aircraft structural analysis and design courses—Mathematica in an engineering education environment Proc. 2005 Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Annual Conf. Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC), 8143–8153.Google Scholar
• Shoufan A, Lu Z, Huss SA (2015) A web-based visualization and animation platform for digital logic design. IEEE Trans. Learn. Tech. 8(2):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson NC, Hancock PG (2010) The tile puzzle: An experiential exercise in introductory Management Science. BRC Acad. J. Ed. 1(1):33–46.Google Scholar
• Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Ed. Psych. Rev. 10:251–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman A (1985) Preattentive processing in vision. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Processing 31:156–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman A, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psych. 12:97–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tufte E (2001) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT).Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J (2005) Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Ed. Psych. Rev. 17(2):147–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R (2015) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.Crossref, Google Scholar