Case Article—Agile Auto Sub Assemblies: Challenges in Managing Growth, Resource Productivity, and Demand Variability

References

• Becker C, Scholl A (2006) A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168(3):694–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen HK, Hammond JH, Ryckebusch S, Uchikoga H (2008) Toshiba: Ome Works. Harvard Business School Case 696-059, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Buffa ES (1980) Research in operations management. J. Oper. Management 1(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher ML, Hammond JH, Obermeyer WR, Raman A (1994) Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May–June), 83–94. Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Buzacott JA (1989) A framework for understanding flexibility of manufacturing systems. J. Manufacturing Systems 8(2):89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs R, Chase R (2013) Operations and Supply Chain Management (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Shih W, Bernstein ES (2012) Assembling smartphones: Takt time≠ cycle time? Harvard Business School Case 611–012, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Wagner HM (1969) Principles of Operations Research: With Applications to Managerial Decisions (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Weiss H (2013) Teaching note—Implementing line balancing heuristics in spreadsheets. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 13(2):114–125.Link, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright SC, Myers PS (2011) The Morrison Company. Harvard Business School Brief Case 114–564, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Wheelwright SC, Yong S (2011) AIC netbooks: Optimizing product assembly. Harvard Business School Brief Case 114–245, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Wilson RB (1996) Red Brand Canners. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case OSA1, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar