Innovating How to Learn Design Thinking, Making, and Innovation: Incorporating Multiple Modes in Teaching the Innovation Process

References

• Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Abercrombie J (1993) Teaching in groups in higher education: Types, purposes, and techniques. Nias J, ed. The Human Nature of Learning: Selections from the Work of M. L. J. Abercrombie (SHRE and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK), 69–95.Google Scholar
• Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Baregheh A, Rowley J, Sambrook S (2009) Toward a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision 47(8):1323–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berthiaume D (2009) Teaching in the disciplines. Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, eds. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice (Routledge, New York), 215–225.Google Scholar
• Biglan A (1973) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. J. Appl. Psych. 57(3):195–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom BS (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain (David McKay, New York).Google Scholar
• Boehm BW (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21(5):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boni AA, Weingart LR, Evenson S (2009) Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 8(3):407–417.Google Scholar
• Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(6):84–92.Google Scholar
• Cardozo RN, Durfee WK, Ardichvili A, Adams C, Erdman AG, Hoey M, Iaizzo PA, et al. (2002) Experiential education in new product design and business development. J. Product Innovation Management 19(1):4–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cooper RG (2001) Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Cope J (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory Practice 29(4):373–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordoba-Pachon J-R (2011) Abstracting and engaging: Two modes of systems thinking education. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 12(1):43–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunne D, Martin R (2006) Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 5(4):512–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutson AJ, Todd RH, Magleby SP, Sorensen CD (1997) A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project‐oriented capstone courses. J. Engrg. Ed. 86(1):17–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Gregersen HB, Christensen C (2009) Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(4):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK (2009) Teaching innovation through interdisciplinary courses and programmes in product design and development: An analysis at sixteen U.S. schools. Creativity Innovation Management 18(3):199–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Rao J (2011) Creation logic in innovation: From action learning to expertise. Greenberg D, McKone-Sweet K, Wilson HJ, eds. The New Entrepreneurial Leader: Developing Leaders Who Shape Social and Economic Opportunity (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco), 43–61.Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Rao J (2014) Learning emergent strategies through design thinking. Design Management Rev. 25(1):46–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Read JM (2012) Creating innovation leaders: Why we need to blend business and design education. Design Management Rev. 23(4):4–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Seidel VP, Bailey J (2015) Creating space for innovation: The role of a “design zone” within a business school. Crittenden VL, Esper K, Karst N, Slegers R, eds. Evolving Entrepreneurial Education: Innovation in the Babson Classroom (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 217–234.Google Scholar
• Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S (2009) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Garbuio M, Dong A, Lin N, Tschang T, Lovallo D (2017) Demystifying the genius of entrepreneurship: How design cognition can help create the next generation of entrepreneurs. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 17(1):41–61.Google Scholar
• Glen R, Suciu C, Baughn C (2014) The need for design thinking in business schools. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 13(4):653–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon R, Howell J, (1959) Higher Education for Business (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillon ME, Cai-Hillon Y, Brammer D (2012) A brief guide to student projects with industry. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 13(1):10–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Honig B (2004) Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 3(3):258–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley T, Littman J (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from Ideo, America’s Leading Design Firm (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Knight PT (2001) Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching Higher Ed. 6(3):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 4(2):193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolb DA (1984) Experiential Learning (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Krathwohl D, Bloom BS, Masia BB (1973) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain (David McKay, New York).Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS, Srinivasan V (2002) Ten years of experience teaching a multi-disciplinary product development course. J. Product Innovation Management 19(1):32–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marion TJ, Friar JH, Cullinane T (2012) A multi-disciplinary new product development course for technological entrepreneurs. J. Acad. Bus. Ed. 13(1):71–89.Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1992) Response to “MBA: Is the traditional model doomed?” Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(6):128–129.Google Scholar
• Murray F, O’Mahony S (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organ. Sci. 18(6):1006–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering (2004) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2002) The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 1(1):78–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierson RC (1959) The Education of American Businessmen (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (2015) You need an innovation strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(6):44–54.Google Scholar
• Prosser M, Trigwell K (1999) Students’ approaches to learning. Prosser M, Trigwell K, eds. Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education (SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK), 83–107.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Sahal D (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Salo A (2012) A seminar for solving client problems in project teams. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 13(1):17–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, Fixson SK (2013) Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. J. Product Innovation Management 30(S1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shartrand A, Weilerstein P, Besterfield-Sacre M, Golding K (2010) Technology entrepreneurship programs in U.S. engineering schools: Course and program characteristics at the undergraduate level. Proc. 2010 Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Annual Conf. Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC), 15.1198.1–15.1198.10.Google Scholar
• Simpson EJ (1972) The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain (Gryphon House, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Thursby MC, Fuller AW, Thursby J (2009) An integrated approach to educating professionals for careers in innovation. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 8(3):389–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson PC (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang EL, Kleppe JA (2001) Teaching invention, innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering. J. Engrg. Ed. 90(4):565–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilczynski V (2015) Academic maker spaces and engineering design. Proc. Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Annual Conf. Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC), 26.138.1–26.138.19.Google Scholar