Game—Constructivist Exercises to Enhance Teaching of Probability and Statistics for Engineers

References

• Alias M, Lashari TA, Akasah ZA, Kesot MJ (2014) Translating theory into practice: Integrating the affective and cognitive learning dimensions for effective instruction in engineering education. Eur. J. Engrg. Ed. 39(2):212–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambrose S, Bridges MW, DiPietro M, Lovett MC, Norman MK (2010) How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Berns R, Erickson P (2001) An Interactive Web-Based Model for the Professional Development of Teachers in Contextual Teaching and Learning (Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH).Google Scholar
• Bray A, Tangney B (2016) Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: A 21st century learning perspective on realistic mathematics education. Math. Ed. Res. J. 28(1):173–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond L (2008) Powerful Learning: What We Know about Teaching for Understanding (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Felder RM, Silverman LK (1988) Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engrg. Ed. 78(7):674–681.Google Scholar
• Felder RM, Woods DR, Stice JE, Rugarcia A (2000) The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engrg. Ed. 34(1):26–39.Google Scholar
• Forcael E, Gonzalo G, Backhouse Erazo P, Batias L (2018) How do we teach? A practical guide for engineering educators. Internat. J. Engrg. Ed. 34(5):1451–1466.Google Scholar
• Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(23):8410–8415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giridharan K, Raju R (2016) Impact of teaching strategies: Demonstration and lecture strategies and impact of teacher effect on academic achievement in engineering education. Internat. J. Educational Sci. 14(3):174–186.Google Scholar
• Herman GL, Goldberg DE, Green K, Somerville M (2012) Creating low-cost intrinsic motivation course conversions in a large required engineering course. Proc. 2012 Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Annual Conf. Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX), AC2012–3730, 25.357.1–25.357.25.Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Gantes VM, Blank W (2009) Teaching English Language Learners in Career and Technical Education Programs (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Herreid CF (1997) What makes a good case? J. College Sci. Teaching 27(3):163–165.Google Scholar
• Kollöffel B, de Jong T (2013) Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: Combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual laboratory. J. Engrg. Ed. 102(3):375–393.Google Scholar
• Moore TJ, Tank KM, Glancy AW, Kersten JA, Ntow FD (2013) The status of engineering in the current K-12 state science standards (research-to-practice). Presentation, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24, 2013, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• National Science Board (2007) Moving forward to improve engineering education. Report NSB-07-122, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Newstetter WC, Svinicki MD (2014) Learning theories for engineering education practice. Johri A, Olds BM, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (Cambridge University Press, New York), 29–46.Google Scholar
• Orbanic JD, Dimec DS, Cenci M (2016) The effectiveness of a constructivist teaching model on students’ understanding of photosynthesis. J. Baltic Sci. Ed. 15(5):575–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnell D (1995) Why Do I Have to Learn This? (Center for Occupational Research and Development, Waco, TX).Google Scholar
• Prince MJ, Felder RM (2006) Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J. Engrg. Ed. 95(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reeves K, Blank B, Hernandez-Gantes V, Dickerson M (2010). Using constructivist teaching strategies in probability and statistics. Proc. 2010 Amer. Soc. Engrg. Ed. Annual Conf. Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY), AC2010–1675.Google Scholar
• Simons RJ, Bolhuis S (2004) Constructivist learning theories and complex learning environments. Mulder RH, Sloane PFE, eds. New Approaches to Vocational Training in Europe. The Construction of Complex Learning-Teaching Arrangements (Symposium Books, Oxford), 13–25.Google Scholar
• Stylianides AJ, Stylianides GJ (2007) Learning mathematics with understanding: A critical consideration of the learning principle in the principles and standards for school mathematics. Montana Math Enthusiast 4(1):103–114.Google Scholar
• Trenshaw K, Revelo Alonso RA, Earl K, Herman G (2013) Exploring the student experience in low-cost intrinsic motivation course conversions. Proc. 43rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers Ed. Conf. (American Society of Engineering Education and Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Oklahoma City, OK), T1D-1–T1D-3.Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M, Drijvers P (2014) Realistic mathematics education. Stephen L, ed. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (Springer, Dordrecht), 521–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1962) Thought and Language (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 17:89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wankat PC, Felder RM, Smith KA, Oreovicz FS (2002) The scholarship of teaching and learning engineering. (Chapter 11), Huber MT, Morreale S, eds. Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Common Ground (AAHE/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Washington, DC), 217–237.Google Scholar
• Yuanita P, Zakaria E (2016) The effect of realistic mathematics education (RME) implementation to mathematics belief, mathematics representative and mathematics problem solving. Advanced Sci. Lett. 22(8):1989–1992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zohar A, Dori YJ (2003) Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? J. Learn. Sci. 12(2):145–181.Crossref, Google Scholar