Modeling First: Rethinking Undergraduate Operations Management with AI

References

• AhmadiTeshnizi A, Gao W, Brunborg H, Talaei S, Lawless C, Udell M (2025) Optimus-0.3: Using large language models to model and solve optimization problems at scale. Preprint, submitted July 29, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19633.Google Scholar
• Bachiri YA, Mouncif H, Bouikhalene B (2023) Artificial intelligence empowers gamification: Optimizing student engagement and learning outcomes in e-learning and MOOCs. Internat. J. Engrg. Pedagogy 13(8):4–19.Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Bastani O, Sungu A, Ge H, Kabakcı Ö, Mariman R (2025) Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122(26):e2422633122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belkina M, Daniel S, Nikolic S, Haque R, Lyden S, Neal P, Grundy S, Hassan GM (2025) Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies. Comput. Ed.: Artificial Intelligence 8:100407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bien J, Mukherjee G (2025) Generative AI for data science 101: Coding without learning to code. J. Statist. Data Sci. Ed. 33(2):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bien J, Burgos M, Cardon P, Carnevale P, Chen F, Guo Y, Gupta V, et al. (2024) Embracing AI in business education: A case study of USC Marshall School of Business. Preprint, submitted October 16, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975641.Google Scholar
• Bray RL (2025) A tutorial on teaching data analytics with generative AI. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 55(4):319–343.Link, Google Scholar
• Budzyń K, Romańczyk M, Kitala D, Kołodziej P, Bugajski M, Adami HO, Blom J, et al. (2025) Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: A multicentre, observational study. Lancet Gastroenterology Hepatology 10(10):P896–P903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bynum ML, Hackebeil G, Hart WE, Laird CD, Nicholson BL, Siirola JD, Watson JP, Woodruff DL (2020) Pyomo—Optimization Modeling in Python, Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 3rd ed., vol. 67 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Terwiesch C (2008) Matching Supply with Demand, vol. 20012 (McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Cai J, Mandelbaum A, Nagaraja CH, Shen H, Zhao L (2019) Statistical theory powering data science. Statist. Sci. 34(4):669–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Kuo SY, Hwang GH (2022) Chatbot-facilitated nursing education. Ed. Tech. Soc. 25(1):15–27.Google Scholar
• Chemers MM, Tze Hu L, Garcia BF (2001) Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J. Ed. Psych. 93(1):55–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Samroengraja R (2000) The stationary beer game. Production Oper. Management 9(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Xiong P (2023) RSOME in Python: An open-source package for robust stochastic optimization made easy. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(4):717–724.Link, Google Scholar
• Chickering DM, Heckerman D (2003) Targeted advertising on the web with inventory management. Interfaces 33(5):71–77.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Van Wassenhove LN (1993) The natural drift: What happened to operations research? Oper. Res. 41(4):625–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Deslauriers L, McCarty LS, Miller K, Callaghan K, Kestin G (2019) Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(39):19251–19257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobson G, Shumsky R (2006) Web-based simulations for teaching queueing, Little’s law, and inventory management. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 7(1):106–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Tang X, Wang X (2025) Examining the effect of artificial intelligence in relation to students’ academic achievement in classroom: A meta-analysis. Comput. Ed.: Artificial Intelligence 8:100400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Yeager DS (2015) Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Ed. Res. 44(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning I, Huchette J, Lubin M (2017) Jump: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Rev. 59(2):295–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning I, Gupta V, King A, Kung J, Lubin M, Silberholz J (2015) A course on advanced software tools for operations research and analytics. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 15(2):169–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Easton JB (1967) The early editions of Robert Recorde’s ground of Artes. Isis 58(4):515–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckstein J, Riedmueller ST (2002) YASAI: Yet another add-in for teaching elementary Monte Carlo simulation in Excel. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 2(2):12–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans JR (2000) Spreadsheets as a tool for teaching simulation. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 1(1):27–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Falchikov N, Boud D (1989) Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Rev. Ed. Res. 59(4):395–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fourer R, Gay DM, Kernighan BW (1990) AMPL: A mathematical programming language. Management Sci. 36(5):519–554.Link, Google Scholar
• Gorman MF (2021) INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics editor’s statement: The critical role of applied research in analytics. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 51(1):1–5.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant M, Boyd S, Ye Y (2006) Disciplined convex programming. Liberti L, Maculan N, eds. Global Optimization, Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 84 (Springer, Boston), 155–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin P (2007) The use of classroom games in management science and operations research. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 8(1):1–2.Link, Google Scholar
• Hill RR (2002) Process simulation in Excel for a quantitative management course. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 2(3):75–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Howson AG (1982) A History of Mathematics Education in England (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irwin V, Wang K, Tezil T, Zhang J, Filbey A, Jung J, Mann FB, Dilig R, Parker S (2023) Report on the condition of education 2023. Report No. NCES 2023-144, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Jensen PA, Bard JF (2002) Operations Research: Models and Methods (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kan AHR (1989) The future of operations research is bright. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 38(3):282–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1121–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawless C, Schoeffer J, Le L, Rowan K, Sen S, St Hill C, Suh J, Sarrafzadeh B (2024) “I want it that way”‘: Enabling interactive decision support using large language models and constraint programming. ACM Trans. Interactive Intelligent Systems 14(3):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberatore MJ, Luo W (2010) The analytics movement: Implications for operations research. Interfaces 40(4):313–324.Link, Google Scholar
• Lofberg J (2004) YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. 2004 IEEE Internat. Conf. Robotics Automation (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 284–289.Google Scholar
• Martin K (2010) Tutorial: COIN-OR: Software for the OR community. Interfaces 40(6):465–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Mason AJ (2012) OpenSolver - An open source add-in to solve linear and integer progammes in Excel. Klatte D, Lüthi HJ, Schmedders K, eds. Oper. Res. Proc. 2011 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 401–406.Google Scholar
• Mason AJ (2013) SolverStudio: A new tool for better optimisation and simulation modelling in Excel. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 14(1):45–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Mortenson MJ, Doherty NF, Robinson S (2015) Operational research from Taylorism to terabytes: A research agenda for the analytics age. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241(3):583–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Multon KD, Brown SD, Lent RW (1991) Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. J. Counseling Psych. 38(1):30–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Report of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ Commission on Standards. Report, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Pachamanova D (2006) Introducing integer modeling with Excel solver. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 7(1):88–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Pasin F, Giroux H (2011) The impact of a simulation game on operations management education. Comput. Ed. 57(1):1240–1254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamonjison R, Yu TT, Li R, Li H, Carenini G, Ghaddar B, He S, et al. (2022) NL4Opt competition: Formulating optimization problems based on their natural language descriptions. Ciccone M, Stolovitzky G, Albrecht J, eds. Proc. NeurIPS 2022 Competitions Track, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 220 (PMLR, New York), 189–203.Google Scholar
• Recorde R (1543) The Grounde of Artes: Teaching the Perfect Worke and Practise of Arithmeticke (Early English Books Online, London).Google Scholar
• Sitzmann T, Ely K, Brown KG, Bauer KN (2010) Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 9(2):169–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snider B, Balakrishnan J (2013) Lessons learned from implementing web-based simulations to teach operations management concepts. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 13(3):152–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2008) The OR/MS ecosystem: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Oper. Res. 56(2):267–277.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhao M (2024) Can artificial intelligence technology promote the improvement of student learning outcomes?—Meta analysis based on 50 experimental and quasi experimental studies. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Ed. Innovation Multimedia Tech., EIMT 2024 (EAI, Ghent, Belgium).Google Scholar
• Wolfe EW (2010) What impact does calculator use have on test results? Technical report, Pearson Education, London.Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Zhang D, Wu Y, Xu L, Wang YJ, Han X, Fu X, et al. (2024) Chain-of-experts: When LLMs meet complex operations research problems. Kim B, Yue Y, Chaudhuri S, Fragkiadaki K, Khan M, Sun Y, eds. Twelfth Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (OpenReview.net), 48519–48537.Google Scholar
• Yan L, Sha L, Zhao L, Li Y, Martinez-Maldonado R, Chen G, Li X, Jin Y, Gašević D (2024) Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British J. Ed. Tech. 55(1):90–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Niu J, Zhong L, Gyasi JF (2023) The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learn. Environments 31(9):5650–5664.Crossref, Google Scholar