Managing NPD: Cost and Schedule Performance in Design and Manufacturing

References

• Adler P. S., Mandelbaum A., Nguyen V., Schwerer E. From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):458–484Link, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J. Communications technology transfer and the role of technological gatekeeper. R&D Management (1971) 1:14–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Bonner J., Ruekert R. W., Walker O. C.Management Control of Product Development Projects (1998) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, new directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Week Inside Intel. Bus. (1992) . Week (June 1) 86–90, 92, 94Google Scholar
• Carmel E. Cycle time in packaged software firms. J. Product Innovation Management (1995) 12(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. H. An analysis of several new product performance metrics. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):337–349Link, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. R. NCR cashes in on design for assembly. Assembly Engrg. (1988) SeptemberGoogle Scholar
• Cooper R. G.Winning at New Products (1993) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G. Developing new products on time, in time. Res. Tech. Management (1995) Sept.–Oct.):49–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Kekre S., Radhakrishnan S., Srinivasan K. Production differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):37–51Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. Accelerating adaptive processes—Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(March):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger S. Innovation at the speed of information. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(1):149–158Google Scholar
• Eppinger S., Fine C., Ulrich K. Interdisciplinary product design education. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1990) NovemberGoogle Scholar
• Fisher M. L. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(March–April):105–116Google Scholar
• Griffin A. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):24–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing—A comparison between two new product teams. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):360–373Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Souder W. E. Key drivers of reduced cycle time. Res. Tech. Management (1998) 41(4):38–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Wilemon D. L. Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(2):24–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A. Y., Porteus E. L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1431–1440Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Clausing D. P. The house of quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) 66(3):63–73Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., S. C. Wheelwright, K. Clark. Dynamic Manufacturing (1988) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M.Technology Integration (1998) (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Stathakopoulos V., Krishnan H. S. Control combinations in marketing: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence. J. Marketing (1993) 57(1):57–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Hill R. C., Lutkepohl H., Lee T-C.The Theory and Practise of Econometrics (1985) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. A model based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Taylor T. A., Whang S. Price protection in the personal computer industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):467–482Link, Google Scholar
• Mabert V. A., Muth J. F., Schemner R. W. Collapsing new product development times: Six case studies. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9(September):200–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller F. M. Design for assembly: Ford's better idea to improve products. Manufacturing Systems (1988) 6(3):22–24Google Scholar
• Moenart R. K., Souder W. E. Information utility at the R&D/marketing interface. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1592–1610Link, Google Scholar
• Nobeoka K. Inter-project learning in new product development. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 432–436Google Scholar
• Nobeoka K., Cusamano M. A. Multiproject strategy and sales growth: The benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(March):169–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novak S., Eppinger S. D. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25(9):833–847Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G., Maguire M. A. Organizational control: Two functions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20(December):559–569Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahl G., W. Beitz. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (1988) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Rochford L., Rudeluis W. How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9:287–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steward D. The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1981) 28(3):71–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theil H.Principles of Econometrics (1971) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Nimgade A.IDEO Product Development (2000) (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA) . Harvard Business School case #9-600-143Google Scholar
• Thomke S., von Hippel E. Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(4):74–81Google Scholar
• Ullman D. G.The Mechanical Design Process (1992) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Ellison D. E. Holistic customer requirements and the design select decision. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):641–658Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Pearson S. Assessing the importance of design through product archaeology. Management Sci. (1998) 44(3):352–369Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Sartorius D., Pearson S., Jakiela M. Including the value of time in design-for-manufacturing decision making. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):429–447Link, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S., Clark K.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar