Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0274

References

  • Aarts E., Lenstra J. K.Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Abernathy W. J., Rosenbloom R. S. Parallel and sequential R & D strategies: Application of a simple model. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1968) EM-15(1):2–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auerwald P., Kauffman S., Lobo J., Shell K. The production recipes approach to modelling technological innovation: An application to learning by doing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2000) 24:389–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bank D. The Java saga. Wired (1995) December):166–169Google Scholar
  • Beinhocker E. D. Robust adaptive strategies. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(3):95–106Google Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Tsitsiklis J. N.Introduction to Linear Optimization (1997) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Camerer C., Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:325–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman C. B., Ward S. C.Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques, and Insights (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Cheeseman P., Kanefky B., Taylor W. M., Mylopoulos J., Reiter R. Where the really hard problems are. Proc. IJCAI-91 (1991) (San Mateo, CA)331–337Google Scholar
  • Chew W. B., Leonard-Barton D., Bohn R. E. Beating Murphy's law. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) 32(3):5–16Google Scholar
  • Dekel E., Lipman B. L., Rustichini A. Standard state-space models preclude unawareness. Econometrica (1998(a)) 66(1):159–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekel E., Rustichini B. L., Lipman A. Recent development in modeling unforeseen contingencies. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1998(b)) 42:523–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekel E., Lipman B. L., Rustichini A. Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica (2001) 69(4):891–934CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evenson R. E., Kislev Y. A stochastic model of applied research. J. Political Econom. (1976) 84(2):265–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira A. G., Zerovnik J. Bounding the probability of success of stochastic methods for global optimization. Comput. Math. Appl. (1993) 25:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox B. L. Random restarting versus simulated annealing. Comput. Math. Appl. (1993) 27:33–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox B. L. Integrating and accelerating tabu search. Ann. Oper. Res. (1994) 41:47–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frenken K. A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909–1997). Res. Policy (2000) 29:257–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frenken K. Modelling the organization of innovative activity using the NK-model. Nelson-and-Winter Conf. (2001) (Aalborg, Denmark)1–24Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. A. Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):78–91Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamel G., Prahalad C. K.Competing for the Future (1994) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Isenberg D. J. How senior managers think. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1984) 62(6):81–90Google Scholar
  • Jacobson S. H., Yücesan E. Performance results for generalized hill-climbing algorithms. (1998) . INSEAD working paper, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoret. Biol. (1987) 128:11–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A., Lobo J., Macready W. G. Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2000) 43(2):141–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A., Macready W. G., Dickinson E. Divide to coordinate: Coevolutionary problem solving. (1994) . Working paper 94-06-031. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps D., Dasgupta P., Gale D., Hart O., Maskin E. Static choice and unforeseen contingencies. Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 259–281Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Solt M. E., Bailey E. Managing projects with unforeseeable uncertainty: How a learning approach can improve venture capital returns. (2004) . INSEAD working paper, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lynn G. S., Morone J. G., S Paulson A. Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. Calif. Management Rev. (1996) 38(3):8–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E., Tirole J. Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(1):83–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):118–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller R., Lessard D. R.The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects (2000) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Modica S., Rustichini A. Awareness and partial information structure. Theory Decision (1994) 37:107–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Modica S., Rustichini A. Unawareness and partial information structure. Games Econom. Behavior (1999) 27(2):265–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Page S. E. Uncertainty, difficulty, and complexity. (1998) . Working paper 98-08-076E. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
  • Pich M. T., Loch C. H., De Meyer A. On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1008–1023LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rudin W.Principles of Mathematical Analysis (1976) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sanderson S., Uzumeri M. Managing product families: The case of the Sony walkman. Res. Policy (1995) 24:761–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrader S., Riggs W. M., Smith R. P. Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1993) 10:73–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1950) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon. The Science of the Artificial (1969) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sobek D. K., Ward A. C., Liker J. K. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40:67–83Google Scholar
  • Sobiezczanski-Sobieski J., Agte J. S., Sandusky R. R. Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS). 7th AIAA Sympos. Multi-disciplinary Anal. Optim. Collect. Tech. Papers (1998) Pt. 3(St. Louis, MO). (A98-39701 10-31)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V., Lovejoy W. S., Beach D. Integrated product design for marketability and manufacturing. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:154–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stadler P. F., Schnabl W. The landscape of the traveling salesman problem. Phys. Lett. A (1992) 161:337–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stalk G., Webber A. M. Japan's dark side of time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):93–102Google Scholar
  • Thomke S. H. Simulation, learning and R & D performance: Evidence from automotive development. Res. Policy (1998) 27:55–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. H., Reinertsen D. Agile product development. Calif. Management Rev. (1998) 41(1):8–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A.Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward A., Liker J. K., Cristiano J. J., Sobek D. K. The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) 36(3):43–61Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M.Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (2001) (University of Michigan Business School Management Series, Jossey-Bass, Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weinberger E. Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference. Biol. Cybern. (1990) 63:325–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinberger E. Local properties of Kauffman's N-K model: A tunable rugged energy landscape. Phys. Rev. A (1991) 44(10):6399–6413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica (1979) 47:641–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wideman R. M.Project and Program Risk Management (1992) (Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.