50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration

References

• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of innovation in technology. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:41–47Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Clark K. B. Behind the learning curve: The learning process. Management Sci. (1991) 37(4):267–281Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R. When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:667–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R., Levinthal D. Technology evolution and demand heterogeneity: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47:611–628Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R., Zemsky P. A demand-based view of sustainable competitive advantage: The evolution of substitutes threats, resource rents and competitive positions. (2003) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Adner R., Zemsky P. When are technologies disruptive: A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. RAND J. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal A., Henderson R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):44–61Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Amit R., Glosten L., Muller E. Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments and risk sharing. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1232–1245Link, Google Scholar
• Andrews K.The Concept of Corporate Strategy (1971) (Dow-Jones Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I.Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion (1965) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I., Brandenburg R. G. A language for organization design: Part I. Management Sci. (1971) 17(12):B705–Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Bain J. S.Barriers to New Competition (1956) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett W. The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):139–158Google Scholar
• Barnett W., Burgelman R. Evolutionary perspectives on strategy. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):5–20Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1231–1241Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: Some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bower J. L.Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment (1970) (HBS Division of Research, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Sci. (1983) 29(12):1349–1364Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):24–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G., Bigelow L., Seidel M. D., Tsa L. The fate of De Novo and De Alio producers in the American automobile industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):117–138Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Rosenbloom R. Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Res. Policy (1995) 24(2):233–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Suarez F. F., Utterback J. M. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):S207–Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):227–251Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., Burkhart R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M., Winter S. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:653–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collis D., Montgomery C. Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Bus. School Rev. (1995) 73(4):118–129Google Scholar
• Conner K. R., Rumelt R. P. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. (1991) 37(2):125–139Link, Google Scholar
• Cool K. O., Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1102–1124Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Denrell J., Fang C., Levinthal D. From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning with model-based feedback. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10Link, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Nelson R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Levinthal D., Marengo L. Bridging contested terrain: Linking incentive-based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:413–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management. J. (2000) 21:10–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S. Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. (2003) . Working paper University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Ethiraj S., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–174Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–630Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gavetti G. Evolutionary theory revisited: Cognition capabilities, and hierarchy. (2003) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Rivkin J. W., Levinthal D. Strategy-making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. (2003) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Ghemawat P.Commitment (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P. Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Bus. Hist. Rev. (2002) 76:37–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Levinthal D. Choice interactions and business strategy. (2002) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Gittelman M., Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):366–382Link, Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt R. B.The Material Basis of Evolution (1940) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Gould S. J., Eldridge N. Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology (1977) 3:115–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I-III. Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. (1967) 14(3):159–182Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1720–1747Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E.The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities: Emergence, Development, and Change (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Lieberman M. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):725–760Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Mitchell W. The interactions of organizational and competitive influences on strategy and performance. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):5–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Orsenigo L., Pisano G., Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R. The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Exploring the interactions among scientific, institutional organizational change. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 267–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M., Winter S. Capabilities, transaction costs, and evolution: Understanding the institutional structure of production. (2003) . Working paper, London Business School, London, U.K.Google Scholar
• Karim S., Mitchell W. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1061–1081Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A., Tucci C. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186Link, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Industry life cycles. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6(11):145–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S., Simons K. L. The making of an oligopoly: Firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the U.S. tire industry. J. Political Econom. (2000a) 108(4):728–760Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S., Simons K. L. Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. (2000b) 21(10–11):997–1016Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Sci. (1991) 37(1):19–33Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Lant T. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644Link, Google Scholar
• Lee J. Innovation and strategic divergence: An empirical study of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry from 1920 to 1960. Management Sci. (2003) 49(2):143–170Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Montgomery C. Strategic management and the exploration of diversity. Evolutionary and Resource-Based Approaches to Strategy (1995) (Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43:934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Indust. Corporate Change (1998) 7(2):217–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Myatt J. Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: A study of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Rerup C. Mindful and less mindful organizations: Exploring models of organizational learning. (2003) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S. History-friendly' models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1998) 8(1):3–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Co., New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G.A Primer on Decision Making (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mason R. O. A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Sci. (1969) 15(8):B403–Link, Google Scholar
• McGahan A., Porter M. E. What do we know about variance in accounting performance? Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):834–852Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Sci. (1978) 24(9):921–933Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H.Organizations: A Quantum View (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Sci. (1971) 24(9):934–948Link, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether or when? Probability and timing of incumbent's entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(2):208–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitroff I. I., Barabba V. P., Kilmann R. The application of behavioral and philosophical technologies to strategic planning: A case study of a large federal agency. Management Sci. (1977) 24(1):44–58Link, Google Scholar
• Mitroff I. I., Emshoff J. R., Kilmann R. H. Assumptional analysis: A methodology for strategic problem solving. Management Sci. (1979) 25(6):583–593Link, Google Scholar
• Mitroff I. I., Mason R. O., Barabba V. P. Policy as argument—A logic for ill-structured decision problems. Management Sci. (1982) 28(12):1391–1404Link, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R.Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narduzzo A., Rocco E., Warglien M., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Talking about routines in the field. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Evolutionary theorizing in economics. J. Econom. Perspectives (2002) 16(2):23–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(4):599–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P., Bohmer R. M. J., Edmondson A. C. Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):752–768Link, Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H., Baden-Fuller C. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. (1989) 26(4):397–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is strategy. Harvard Bus. School Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. School Rev. (1990) 68(3):79–92Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–312Link, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E., Tushman M. Inertia, environments, and strategic choice: A quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):608–622Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N., Nelson R. R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy (1994) 23(3):323–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P., Lamb R. B. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 21(3):167–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall M. Subjective rationality self-confirming equilibrium, and corporate strategy. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):936–949Link, Google Scholar
• Schendel D., Patton G. R. A simultaneous equation model of corporate strategy. Management Sci. (1978) 24(9):1611–1621Link, Google Scholar
• Schmanlensee R. Do firms differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:341–351Google Scholar
• Shane S. Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Sci. (2001a) 47(2):205–220Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S. Technological regimes and new firm formation. Management Sci. (2001b) 47(9):1173–1190Link, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. Myles. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI success? Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–586Link, Google Scholar
• Silverman B., Nickerson J., Freeman J. Profitability, transaction alignment, and organizational mortality in the U.S. tucking industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):31–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman B. Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Towards and integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1109–1124Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1976) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):446–463Link, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriability and the challenge of scope: BancOne routinizes replication. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) 69–98Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Rumelt R., Dosi G., Winter S. Understanding corporate coherence. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1994) 23:1–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–553Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Romanelli E., Cummings L., Staw B. Organization evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behavior (1985) 7:171–222Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Rosenkopf L. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):939–953Link, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B., Montgomery C. A. What is an attractive industry? Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1223–1230Link, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:981–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):730–793Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–353Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Reuer J., Singh H. Inteorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–714Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Armstrong J. S. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):138–154Link, Google Scholar